backend-architecture
Skill0 starsChanged 3 days agoMITView on GitHub
Shape backend changes around explicit boundaries, data ownership, reliability, security, and the project's actual scale.
11 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- veegres/ivorytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- mahik504/orchestra-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- overmind-core/overmindtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- LuisaGroup/LuisaComputetheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- polyant-ai/polyanttheir own version, first seen Sep 11, 2026
- we-are-singular/skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use frontend-architecture.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillfrontend-architecture
Internal frontend architecture, design, implementation, verification, and audit rules loaded only when an explicitly invoked repository SDD prompt directs the agent to this skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- LuisaGroup/LuisaCompute★ 1.1ksame name
- overmind-core/overmind★ 752same name
- veegres/ivory★ 282same name
- GoldenWing-360/claude-security-skills★ 16same name
- polyant-ai/polyant★ 10same name
- alyanhaider/system-architecture★ 2same name
- jerry-20160416/skills★ 2same name
- we-are-singular/skills★ 2same name
- bedomax/webdesigner-agent★ 1same name
- mahik504/orchestra-workflow★ 1same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- admin-panelSkill
- ai-agent-interfaceSkill
- ai-chat-interfaceSkill
- ai-dashboardSkill
- ai-engineeringSkill
- analytics-and-data-visualizationSkill
- animation-and-motionSkill
- api-engineeringSkill
- authentication-and-rbacSkill
- component-engineeringSkill
- dashboard-designSkill
- database-engineeringSkill
- design-intelligenceSkill
- design-systemsSkill
- frontend-engineeringSkill
- iconographySkill
- image-art-directionSkill
- integrations-and-webhooksSkill
- javascript-typescriptSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- premium-landing-pagesSkill
- python-engineeringSkill
- rag-and-knowledge-systemsSkill
- responsive-designSkill
- saas-dashboardSkill
- security-engineeringSkill
- super-admin-panelSkill
- testing-and-qualitySkill
- unslop-engineSkill
- ux-researchSkill
- visual-designSkill
- visual-regressionSkill
- website-architectureSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use for new backend services, major domain features, service boundaries, data flows, or production-readiness review.
- Distinctive: line 15
Do not split a small application into services without an operational reason.
- Distinctive: line 29
Keep domain rules in the existing appropriate layer.
- Distinctive: line 35
Add timeouts, bounded retries, rate limits, and observability at external boundaries.
- Distinctive: line 37
Avoid secrets in logs; define data retention and sensitive-field handling.
- Distinctive: line 39
Test invariants, permissions, failure paths, migrations, and integration contracts.
- Distinctive: line 41
Document operational assumptions, monitoring, recovery, and known limitations.
- Distinctive: line 46
Start with the simplest architecture that meets verified requirements.
- Distinctive: line 47
Every resource read or write must enforce the correct owner/tenant access.
- Distinctive: line 50
Do not log full credentials, tokens, or sensitive payloads.
- Distinctive: line 51
Treat migration and deletion as user-impacting operations requiring an explicit plan.
- Distinctive: line 56
Keep request parsing and domain validation explicit:
- Distinctive: line 84
Use the backend boundary and reliability guide when the change crosses persistence, tenant boundaries, external services, or asynchronous …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Backend Architecture
When to use
Use for new backend services, major domain features, service boundaries, data flows, or production-readiness review.
When not to use
Do not split a small application into services without an operational reason. Do not prescribe a database, cloud, queue, or framework before understanding requirements.
Inputs and assumptions
Inspect the existing runtime, deployment model, data stores, domain boundaries, traffic and latency needs, failure tolerance, tenancy, privacy, team operations, and migration constraints.
Workflow
- Describe actors, business invariants, trust boundaries, request/data flows, and failure cases.
- Keep domain rules in the existing appropriate layer; separate transport, persistence, and external-service concerns using local conventions.
- Define API contracts, validation, authorization, error semantics, idempotency, and pagination before implementation.
- Plan schema changes and backfills for compatibility, rollback, and existing data.
- Add timeouts, bounded retries, rate limits, and observability at external boundaries.
- Avoid secrets in logs; define data retention and sensitive-field handling.
- Test invariants, permissions, failure paths, migrations, and integration contracts.
- Document operational assumptions, monitoring, recovery, and known limitations.
Decision rules
- Start with the simplest architecture that meets verified requirements.
- Every resource read or write must enforce the correct owner/tenant access.
- Retry only operations that are safe to retry; use idempotency for externally retried writes.
- Do not log full credentials, tokens, or sensitive payloads.
- Treat migration and deletion as user-impacting operations requiring an explicit plan.
Python example
Keep request parsing and domain validation explicit:
def require_non_empty(value: str, field: str) -> str:
normalized = value.strip()
if not normalized:
raise ValueError(f"{field} must not be empty")
return normalizedTranslate validation failures into the service's established error contract; do not expose internal stack traces to clients.
Common failures
- Premature microservices or unbounded background work.
- Authorization checked only in the UI.
- Retrying non-idempotent operations after timeouts.
- Destructive schema changes without a recovery strategy.
Validation
Review data ownership, authorization, input boundaries, error behavior, timeouts, retry/idempotency, migration safety, tests, and operational visibility.
Supporting guide
Use the backend boundary and reliability guide when the change crosses persistence, tenant boundaries, external services, or asynchronous work.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

