agentleFS
NoorQureshiNoorQureshi/SploitAgent/skills/code-review/code-review-php/SKILL.md

code-review-php

Skill26 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub

Security review of PHP code — dangerous sinks and framework pitfalls (Laravel/Symfony/WordPress). Load when reviewing a PHP codebase/PR, on .php source in scope, or "review this PHP". Signals: composer.json, index.php, Laravel/Symfony/WP, unserialize, include/require with variables, mysqli/PDO.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check upload handlers (extension/content-type allowlist, exec in upload dir).

    line 47

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

PHP source review

When it applies

Reviewing PHP source (a repo, a PR, or a leaked webroot). PHP's defaults and dynamic features make several classes easy to introduce, so a grep-then-trace pass finds most of them fast.

Why it works

Many PHP sinks execute or include whatever string they're given, and loose typing turns comparison and casting into logic bugs. Tracing each sink back to a request source ($_GET/$_POST/$_REQUEST/ $_COOKIE/$_SERVER, php://input) tells you which are actually reachable.

Sinks & patterns (grep, then trace to user input)

  • Code exec: eval, assert, preg_replace with /e, create_function, call_user_func(_array).
  • Command exec: system, exec, shell_exec, passthru, proc_open, popen, backticks.
  • File include (LFI/RFI): include/require(_once) with a variable; allow_url_include.
  • SQLi: string-interpolated queries into mysqli_query/PDO::query (vs prepared statements).
  • Deserialization: unserialize() on input (POP chains); phar:// via file functions.
  • File / path: file_get_contents, fopen, readfile, move_uploaded_file with user paths.
  • Other: extract() on input (variable overwrite), parse_str, SSRF via curl/file_get_contents.

Framework specifics

  • Laravel: DB::raw/whereRaw, Blade {!! !!} (unescaped), mass assignment ($guarded=[]), unserialize in queues, Storage path traversal.
  • Symfony: unsafe deserialization, Twig |raw, expression-language injection.
  • WordPress: unsanitised $wpdb->query, missing nonce/cap checks, unsafe add_query_arg, unauthenticated AJAX/REST callbacks.

Method

  1. rg the sinks above; for each, trace the argument back to a request source.
  2. Note type-juggling auth checks (== vs ===, strcmp returning 0/null) and loose casts.
  3. Check upload handlers (extension/content-type allowlist, exec in upload dir).
  4. Confirm exploitability with the matching runtime skill (web-command-injection, web-deserialization, web-lfi-path-traversal, web-sqli).

Gotchas

  • A sink is only a bug if input reaches it — don't report unreachable eval.
  • WordPress plugins: unauthenticated wp_ajax_nopriv_* and REST endpoints are the high-value paths.
  • == type juggling ("0e123"=="0e456") still breaks weak hash/token comparisons.

References

OWASP PHP security; RIPS/progpilot sink catalogue; PHP unserialize POP-chain research (PHentication).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.