qa-retrospective
Skill31 starsChanged 48 days agoMITView on GitHub
当一个迭代结束、一个项目完成、或者发生线上事故需要事后分析时使用此技能。通过系统性的回顾会议和数据复盘,把个人和团队的经验教训转化为可复用的组织资产。不要沦为"说说好话走个形式"——有效的复盘需要有数据支撑(缺陷趋势/漏测分析/效率数据)、有根因分析(为什么出问题)和有 action items(下次怎么做不一样)。输出复盘报告和改进项追踪表。 触发场景:测试复盘、迭代复盘、项目复盘、经验沉淀、漏测分析、回顾总结、事后分析、反复出现同类问题需要根因改进时。 Use when the user asks about: test retrospectives and post-incident review — defect trends, escaped-defect analysis, efficiency data, and turning lessons into reusable assets.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- SUDARSHANCHAUDHARI/QACrafttheir own version, first seen Jul 21, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- SUDARSHANCHAUDHARI/QACraft★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository50 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- qa-agent-testingSkill
- qa-ai-blindspot-compensationSkill
- qa-ai-context-engineeringSkill
- qa-ai-output-critiqueSkill
- qa-ai-prompt-strategySkill
- qa-api-testingSkill
- qa-boundary-deep-diveSkill
- qa-bug-lifecycleSkill
- qa-bug-reportingSkill
- qa-bug-root-cause-analysisSkill
- qa-ci-cd-testingSkill
- qa-code-review-for-testSkill
- qa-combination-strategySkill
- qa-critical-thinkingSkill
- qa-domain-modelingSkill
- qa-execution-observationSkill
- qa-expert-reviewSkill
- qa-exploratory-testingSkill
- qa-heuristic-checklistSkill
- qa-input-validationSkill
- qa-mobile-testingSkill
- qa-output-validationSkill
- qa-quality-metricsSkill
- qa-question-frameworkSkill
- qa-regression-testingSkill
- qa-release-risk-governanceSkill
- qa-req-deconstructionSkill
- qa-requirement-reviewSkill
- qa-risk-intuitionSkill
- qa-scenario-treeSkill
- qa-shift-leftSkill
- qa-shift-rightSkill
- qa-specialized-testingSkill
- qa-stakeholder-communicationSkill
- qa-state-transitionSkill
- qa-team-coachingSkill
- qa-tech-debt-managementSkill
- qa-tech-selectionSkill
- qa-testability-advocacySkill
- qa-test-automation-archSkill
- qa-test-case-designSkill
- qa-test-data-engineeringSkill
- qa-test-env-dataSkill
- qa-test-estimationSkill
- qa-test-leadershipSkill
- qa-test-reportingSkill
- qa-test-skillsSkill
- qa-test-strategy-designSkill
The file
Files
⚠️ 本技能单独使用效果有限,建议配合完整技能集(12 步工作流)使用。安装:npx skills add Kokxi/qa-test-skills
⚠️ 安全警告:本技能的示例可能涉及发布流程优化和协作流程调整建议。 这些是复盘议题不是直接操作;请勿未经评审即变更团队流程,先达成共识再落地。 本技能仅在 workspace/ 输出评估文件,不持久化、不外传、不跨会话复用。
复盘与经验沉淀
核心原则
复盘的目的是找到系统性的改进点,而不是找谁背锅。
加载时机
| 什么时候读 | 读哪个 |
| 需要五步法的方法细节时,取对应小节 | references/five-steps.md |
复盘五步法的完整内容已下沉至references/five-steps.md,避免每次触发都占用上下文。
复盘报告模板
# 复盘报告
## 1. 基本信息
- 迭代版本:[版本号]
- 复盘时间:[日期]
- 参与人员:[人员列表]
## 2. 数据回顾
- 缺陷数据:[新增X个,严重X个]
- 漏测数据:[线上X个]
- 测试数据:[执行率X%,通过率X%]
## 3. 问题分析
- 主要问题:[问题描述]
- 根因分析:[5 Whys分析]
- 根因归类:[思维/信息/流程/工具/能力]
## 4. 改进措施
- 措施1:[具体措施]
- 措施2:[具体措施]
- 措施3:[具体措施]
## 5. 资产沉淀
- Checklist更新:[更新内容]
- 模板更新:[更新内容]
- 知识库更新:[更新内容]
## 6. 跟踪计划
- 检查时间:[时间]
- 负责人:[人员]
- 验收标准:[标准]应用场景
迭代结束后复盘:用户登录模块出现了3个线上Bug → 第1步:收集数据(Bug报告、修复记录、测试用例覆盖) → 第2步:5 Whys分析(why漏测?→边界用例未覆盖→why?→测试设计时未识别边界→why?→需求未说明边界) → 第3步:改进措施(增加边界分析环节、补充典型边界checklist) → 第4步:资产沉淀(将边界checklist更新到启发式清单) → 第5步:跟踪计划(下个迭代验证新增checklist的有效性)
用户说"这个问题又发生了" → 触发复盘:系统性的根因分析,避免同类问题再次发生
自检清单
复盘完成后检查:
- 数据收集是否完整?
- 根因分析是否深入?
- 改进措施是否具体?
- 资产沉淀是否完成?
- 跟踪计划是否制定?
- 经验是否分享?
检查清单
- 数据是否支撑结论?
- 根因是否分析?
- action items是否可执行?
- 责任人和时限是否明确?
- 追踪机制是否建立?
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

