qa-quality-metrics
Skill31 starsChanged 48 days agoMITView on GitHub
当管理层问"质量到底怎么样"、需要量化质量数据来做决策、或者想建立质量看板来跟踪趋势时使用此技能。从过程质量（需求评审通过率/用例覆盖度）、结果质量（Bug 密度/线上事故数）、效率（测试周期/回归耗时）和健康度（自动化通过率/环境稳定性）四个维度设计度量指标。⚠️ 度量的目的不是打分，是发现问题趋势——如果只报喜不报忧，度量就没用了。 触发场景：质量度量、质量指标、怎么量化质量、质量看板、质量数据、趋势分析、向管理层展示质量数据时。 Use when the user asks about: test quality metrics and dashboards — process, result, efficiency, and health indicators for management reporting.
In this repository50 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- qa-agent-testingSkill
- qa-ai-blindspot-compensationSkill
- qa-ai-context-engineeringSkill
- qa-ai-output-critiqueSkill
- qa-ai-prompt-strategySkill
- qa-api-testingSkill
- qa-boundary-deep-diveSkill
- qa-bug-lifecycleSkill
- qa-bug-reportingSkill
- qa-bug-root-cause-analysisSkill
- qa-ci-cd-testingSkill
- qa-code-review-for-testSkill
- qa-combination-strategySkill
- qa-critical-thinkingSkill
- qa-domain-modelingSkill
- qa-execution-observationSkill
- qa-expert-reviewSkill
- qa-exploratory-testingSkill
- qa-heuristic-checklistSkill
- qa-input-validationSkill
- qa-mobile-testingSkill
- qa-output-validationSkill
- qa-question-frameworkSkill
- qa-regression-testingSkill
- qa-release-risk-governanceSkill
- qa-req-deconstructionSkill
- qa-requirement-reviewSkill
- qa-retrospectiveSkill
- qa-risk-intuitionSkill
- qa-scenario-treeSkill
- qa-shift-leftSkill
- qa-shift-rightSkill
- qa-specialized-testingSkill
- qa-stakeholder-communicationSkill
- qa-state-transitionSkill
- qa-team-coachingSkill
- qa-tech-debt-managementSkill
- qa-tech-selectionSkill
- qa-testability-advocacySkill
- qa-test-automation-archSkill
- qa-test-case-designSkill
- qa-test-data-engineeringSkill
- qa-test-env-dataSkill
- qa-test-estimationSkill
- qa-test-leadershipSkill
- qa-test-reportingSkill
- qa-test-skillsSkill
- qa-test-strategy-designSkill
The file
Files
⚠️ 本技能单独使用效果有限，建议配合完整技能集（12 步工作流）使用。安装：npx skills add Kokxi/qa-test-skills
质量度量体系
核心原则
质量不是感觉，是可以量化的。
加载时机
| 什么时候读 | 读哪个 |
| 选指标、算指标或查数据来源时，取四类详表 | references/metrics-dimensions.md |
四类度量指标的完整内容已下沉至references/metrics-dimensions.md，避免每次触发都占用上下文。
度量报告模板
# 质量度量报告
## 1. 过程度量
- 用例执行率：[X]% (目标≥95%)
- 用例通过率：[X]% (目标≥90%)
- 需求覆盖率：[X]% (目标100%)
- 自动化覆盖率：[X]%
## 2. 结果度量
- 缺陷密度：[X]/功能点
- 缺陷修复率：[X]% (目标≥95%)
- 漏测率：[X]% (目标≤5%)
- 逃逸率：[X]% (目标≤10%)
## 3. 效率度量
- 测试周期：[X]天
- 用例执行效率：[X]条/人天
- 缺陷发现效率：[X]个/人天
- 缺陷修复周期：[X]天
## 4. 健康度量
- 缺陷趋势：[上升/稳定/下降]
- 缺陷收敛：[收敛/发散]
- 质量趋势：[改善/稳定/恶化]
## 5. 风险分析
- 高风险模块：[模块列表]
- 主要问题：[问题描述]
- 改进建议：[建议列表]输出示例
需要度量当前迭代的质量 → 四类度量：
- 过程度量：用例评审通过率、缺陷发现率
- 结果度量：遗留缺陷密度、线上故障数
- 效率度量：测试执行效率、缺陷平均修复时间
- 健康度量：缺陷趋势图、质量评分变化 → 输出：质量度量报告，含目标值对比和改进方向
用户说"质量到底怎么样" → 自动生成质量度量报告，用数据展示质量趋势
检查清单
质量度量完成后检查：
- 度量指标是否定义？
- 数据收集是否可行？
- 目标值是否合理？
- 报告格式是否清晰？
- 改进建议是否可行？
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.