agentleFS
sergeeeysergeeey/Claude-cod-top-2026/skills/extensions/paper-to-code/SKILL.md

paper-to-code

Skill9 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Convert an ML research paper into a complete, runnable code repository. 3-stage pipeline from Paper2Code — Planning (UML + dependency graph) → Analysis (per-file logic) → Coding (dependency-ordered generation). Use for reproducing paper methods.

7 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use atomic-decomposition, math-reasoning and 1 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • lingzhi227Skill

    atomic-decomposition

    Decompose research ideas into atomic, self-contained concepts with bidirectional math-code mapping. For each concept, extract the math formula from papers and find code implementations. Use for complex system papers requiring formal grounding.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • lingzhi227Skill

    math-reasoning

    Formal mathematical reasoning for research papers — derive equations, write proofs, formalize problem settings, select statistical tests, and generate LaTeX math notation. Use when the user needs mathematical derivations, theorem proofs, notation tables, or statistical analysis formalization.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    idea-generation

    Use when triaging public-equity idea candidates. Do not use for final trade recommendations, pitches, memos, or models.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Follow the UML class diagram interfaces strictly

    line 36
  2. Distinctive:

    Follow the design's data structures and interfaces exactly

    line 41
  3. Distinctive:

    Write complete code — no TODOs or placeholders

    line 43
  4. Distinctive:

    No fabrication: Only use configurations explicitly stated in the paper

    line 70
  5. Distinctive:

    Complete code: Every function must be fully implemented

    line 71
  6. Distinctive:

    Follow the paper's methodology exactly — do not invent improvements

    line 75
  7. Very specific:

    Use config.yaml for all hyperparameters and settings

    line 77
  8. Distinctive:

    Every class/method in UML diagram must exist in code

    line 78
  9. Distinctive:

    If paper details are ambiguous, note them explicitly

    line 80

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Paper to Code

Convert a research paper into a complete, runnable code repository.

Input

  • $0 — Paper PDF path, paper text, or paper URL

References

  • Paper2Code prompts (planning, analysis, coding stages): ~/.claude/skills/paper-to-code/references/paper-to-code-prompts.md

Workflow (from Paper2Code)

Stage 1: Planning

Four-turn conversation to create a comprehensive plan:

  1. Overall Plan: Extract methodology, experiments, datasets, hyperparameters, evaluation metrics
  2. Architecture Design: Generate file list, Mermaid classDiagram, sequenceDiagram
  3. Task Breakdown: Logic analysis per file, dependency-ordered task list, required packages
  4. Configuration: Extract training details into config.yaml

Stage 2: Analysis

For each file in the task list (dependency order):

  1. Conduct detailed logic analysis
  2. Map paper methodology to code structure
  3. Reference the config.yaml for all settings
  4. Follow the UML class diagram interfaces strictly

Stage 3: Coding

For each file in dependency order:

  1. Generate code with access to all previously generated files
  2. Follow the design's data structures and interfaces exactly
  3. Reference config.yaml — never fabricate configuration values
  4. Write complete code — no TODOs or placeholders

Stage 4: Debugging (if needed)

If execution fails:

  1. Collect error messages
  2. Identify root cause using SEARCH/REPLACE diff format
  3. Apply minimal fixes preserving original intent
  4. Re-run until successful

Output Structure

reproduced_code/
├── config.yaml        # Training configuration
├── main.py            # Entry point
├── model.py           # Model architecture
├── dataset_loader.py  # Data loading
├── trainer.py         # Training loop
├── evaluation.py      # Metrics and evaluation
├── reproduce.sh       # Run script
└── requirements.txt   # Dependencies

Key Constraints

  • Dependency order: Each file is generated with access to all previously generated files
  • Interface contracts: Mermaid diagrams serve as rigid interface definitions across all stages
  • No fabrication: Only use configurations explicitly stated in the paper
  • Complete code: Every function must be fully implemented

Rules

  • Follow the paper's methodology exactly — do not invent improvements
  • Generate code in dependency order (data loading → model → training → evaluation → main)
  • Use config.yaml for all hyperparameters and settings
  • Every class/method in UML diagram must exist in code
  • Generate a reproduce.sh script for one-command execution
  • If paper details are ambiguous, note them explicitly

Related Skills

  • Downstream: experiment-code
  • See also: code-debugging, algorithm-design

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.