prd-generator
Skill3 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Produce a Product Requirements Document (PRD) for a defined feature or MVP scope with goals, requirements, and success metrics. Use when working on PRDs, MVP specs, functional requirements.
30 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ahmadammarm/musyskillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- luongnv89/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- imohammadfaraz/claude-skills-for-product-managertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- coco-research/cocotheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- hongphuc5497/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- scalershare/prd-generatortheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ui-ux-design, bug-fix and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
rogue-dev-studioSkillui-ux-design
Expert UI/UX design for product interfaces: user flows, information architecture, wireframes, interaction patterns, accessibility, and a mandatory theme/brand alignment gate against the active project (PROJECT.md, design docs, existing tokens/visual language). Use before or alongside frontend work when designing screens, reviewing mockups, or validating that proposed UI matches the project theme already in progress or about to ship.
Also in 3 projects that use this
u9401066Skillbug-fix
Structured bug fixing workflow with root cause analysis and regression prevention. Triggers: BF, 修 bug, fix bug, debug, 除錯, 錯誤, error, 問題, issue, 修復, fix, 故障, fault, 異常, exception, 失敗, failure, 不能用, broken, 壞掉.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillskill-creator
Create new agent skills following the Agent Skills specification. Use when asked to "create a skill", "add a new skill", "write a skill", "make a skill", "build a skill", or scaffold a new skill with SKILL.md. Guides through requirements, writing, registration, and verification.
Also in 5 projects that use this
VercelSkillfind-skills
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillfrontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions30 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 30
- coco-research/coco★ 797same name
- Fokkyp/claude-skills★ 211same name
- jamesrochabrun/skills★ 209same name
- hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter★ 145same name
- luongnv89/skills★ 145same name
- jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers★ 118same name
- ricneves-ai/flowgrammers-skills★ 115same name
- EmeaAppGbb/spec2cloud★ 100same name
- dhzrx/ai-pm-claude-skills★ 22same name
- Vann4799/ai-prd-generator★ 22same name
20 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-memory-designerSkill
- ai-cost-optimizerSkill
- ai-evaluation-builderSkill
- ai-latency-optimizerSkill
- ai-solution-architectSkill
- ai-workflow-builderSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- human-in-the-loop-designerSkill
- multi-agent-plannerSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- prompt-optimizerSkill
- prompt-reviewerSkill
- adr-generatorSkill
- api-designerSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- component-diagram-builderSkill
- container-diagram-builderSkill
- data-flow-analyzerSkill
- integration-plannerSkill
- observability-plannerSkill
- scalability-advisorSkill
- solution-architectureSkill
- system-context-builderSkill
- experiment-designerSkill
- go-to-market-plannerSkill
- pricing-strategy-advisorSkill
- mcp-best-practicesSkill
- mcp-client-generatorSkill
- mcp-security-reviewSkill
- mcp-server-generatorSkill
- mcp-tool-generatorSkill
- acceptance-criteria-generatorSkill
- analytics-instrumentation-plannerSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- epic-generatorSkill
- feature-prioritizationSkill
- idea-validatorSkill
- north-star-metric-advisorSkill
- okr-builderSkill
- persona-generatorSkill
- problem-statement-builderSkill
- product-discovery-assistantSkill
- product-vision-builderSkill
- sprint-plannerSkill
- story-mappingSkill
- user-story-generatorSkill
- value-proposition-designerSkill
- chunking-strategy-advisorSkill
- embedding-strategy-advisorSkill
- hybrid-search-advisorSkill
- knowledge-ingestion-plannerSkill
- rag-architecture-designerSkill
- retriever-optimizerSkill
- ai-governance-advisorSkill
- ai-threat-modelingSkill
- guardrails-builderSkill
- owasp-llm-reviewerSkill
- prompt-injection-detectorSkill
- skill-nameSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 58
Use step-by-step format, not wireframes.
- Distinctive: line 115
Use INVEST criteria when writing requirements (preview for user-story-generator).
- Distinctive: line 116
Keep PRD at "what" level; defer "how" to technical design.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
PRD Generator
Purpose
Produce a Product Requirements Document (PRD) for a defined feature or MVP scope with goals, requirements, and success metrics.
Input: Feature scope, product vision (optional), prioritization results (optional), constraints
Output: PRD document following standard structure with functional and non-functional requirements
Examples: See examples.md for worked input/output.
Workflow
Step 1: Define scope
Confirm:
- Feature or MVP boundary (what is in/out)
- Target persona and problem statement
- Success metrics (from vision or define new)
- Constraints (timeline, platform, compliance)
Step 2: Write executive summary
One paragraph covering: what, for whom, why now, expected outcome.
Step 3: Document requirements
Functional requirements:
- Numbered list (FR-001, FR-002...)
- Each requirement: actor, action, outcome
- Priority: Must / Should / Could
Non-functional requirements:
- Performance, security, scalability, accessibility
- Numbered (NFR-001...)
Step 4: Define user flows
Describe 2–3 primary flows:
- Happy path
- Key edge case
- Error/recovery path
Use step-by-step format, not wireframes.
Step 5: Specify success metrics
| Metric | Baseline | Target | Measurement method |
Step 6: List dependencies and risks
- Technical dependencies
- External integrations
- Open questions
Step 7: Validate
Run Validation checklist.
Decision Rules
| Condition | Action |
| Scope undefined or "everything" | Stop; request MVP boundary or run feature-prioritization |
| Requirement describes implementation | Rewrite as user-facing behavior |
| No success metrics | Define at least 2 from vision or problem statement |
| Conflicting requirements | Flag conflict; ask user to resolve |
| NFRs missing for user-facing product | Add security, performance, accessibility minimums |
Validation
- Executive summary ≤ 1 paragraph
- Scope in/out explicitly stated
- ≥3 functional requirements with IDs and priorities
- ≥2 non-functional requirements
- ≥2 primary user flows documented
- Success metrics have baseline, target, measurement
- Dependencies and risks listed
- No implementation details (tech stack, API design) unless requested
Anti-patterns
- PRD as spec — database schemas and API endpoints in a product PRD.
- No priorities — all requirements marked Must.
- Orphan requirements — FRs not traceable to user problem.
- Missing NFRs — only functional requirements listed.
- Unbounded scope — "and other features as needed."
Best Practices
- Trace each FR to a user problem or goal.
- Use INVEST criteria when writing requirements (preview for user-story-generator).
- Keep PRD at "what" level; defer "how" to technical design.
- Include explicit out-of-scope section.
- Version the PRD with date and change summary.
Output Structure
# PRD: [Feature/MVP Name]
**Version:** 1.0 | **Date:** [date]
## Executive Summary
[One paragraph]
## Scope
- **In scope:**
- **Out of scope:**
## Target User
[Persona reference or summary]
## Functional Requirements
| ID | Requirement | Priority | Rationale |
|----|-------------|----------|-----------|
## Non-Functional Requirements
| ID | Requirement | Priority |
|----|-------------|----------|
## User Flows
### Flow 1: [Name]
1. [Step]
## Success Metrics
| Metric | Baseline | Target | Method |
|--------|----------|--------|--------|
## Dependencies
- [Dependency]
## Risks & Open Questions
| Item | Impact | Owner |
|------|--------|-------|
## Revision History
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---------|------|---------|Next Skills
| Outcome | Recommended Skill |
| Break PRD into epics | product/epic-generator |
| Write user stories | product/user-story-generator |
| Need acceptance criteria | product/acceptance-criteria-generator |
| Visualize user journey | product/story-mapping |
| Ready for technical design | architecture/solution-architecture |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

