integration-planner
Skill3 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Plan integrations between system containers and external systems: patterns, contracts, sequencing, failure handling, and monitoring. Use when working on solution architecture, C4 diagrams, APIs, ADRs, or system design.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jon-devlapaz/agentic-se-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- jon-devlapaz/agentic-se-skills★ 7same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-memory-designerSkill
- ai-cost-optimizerSkill
- ai-evaluation-builderSkill
- ai-latency-optimizerSkill
- ai-solution-architectSkill
- ai-workflow-builderSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- human-in-the-loop-designerSkill
- multi-agent-plannerSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- prompt-optimizerSkill
- prompt-reviewerSkill
- adr-generatorSkill
- api-designerSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- component-diagram-builderSkill
- container-diagram-builderSkill
- data-flow-analyzerSkill
- observability-plannerSkill
- scalability-advisorSkill
- solution-architectureSkill
- system-context-builderSkill
- experiment-designerSkill
- go-to-market-plannerSkill
- pricing-strategy-advisorSkill
- mcp-best-practicesSkill
- mcp-client-generatorSkill
- mcp-security-reviewSkill
- mcp-server-generatorSkill
- mcp-tool-generatorSkill
- acceptance-criteria-generatorSkill
- analytics-instrumentation-plannerSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- epic-generatorSkill
- feature-prioritizationSkill
- idea-validatorSkill
- north-star-metric-advisorSkill
- okr-builderSkill
- persona-generatorSkill
- prd-generatorSkill
- problem-statement-builderSkill
- product-discovery-assistantSkill
- product-vision-builderSkill
- sprint-plannerSkill
- story-mappingSkill
- user-story-generatorSkill
- value-proposition-designerSkill
- chunking-strategy-advisorSkill
- embedding-strategy-advisorSkill
- hybrid-search-advisorSkill
- knowledge-ingestion-plannerSkill
- rag-architecture-designerSkill
- retriever-optimizerSkill
- ai-governance-advisorSkill
- ai-threat-modelingSkill
- guardrails-builderSkill
- owasp-llm-reviewerSkill
- prompt-injection-detectorSkill
- skill-nameSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 57
Document 2–3 end-to-end integration sequences:
- Distinctive: line 123
Prefer events over direct DB sharing between containers.
- Distinctive: line 124
Use circuit breakers for external dependencies.
- Distinctive: line 127
Document integration ADRs for non-obvious pattern choices.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Integration Planner
Purpose
Plan integrations between system containers and external systems: patterns, contracts, sequencing, failure handling, and monitoring.
Input: Container diagram, API designs (optional), external system inventory
Output: Integration Plan with connection matrix, sequence flows, and rollout phases
Examples: See examples.md for worked input/output.
Workflow
Step 1: Inventory integration points
List all integrations:
| Source | Target | Type (sync/async/batch) | Data | Criticality |
Include internal (container-to-container) and external (third-party) connections.
Step 2: Classify integration patterns
Assign pattern per connection:
| Pattern | Use when |
| Request-response (REST/gRPC) | Real-time queries, commands |
| Message queue | Decoupled async processing |
| Event streaming | Multiple consumers, audit trail |
| File/batch transfer | Large volumes, scheduled sync |
| Webhook/callback | External system pushes events |
Step 3: Define contracts
For each integration:
- Message/event schema or API reference
- SLA expectations (latency, availability)
- Authentication mechanism
- Retry and idempotency rules
- Dead letter / poison message handling
Step 4: Sequence critical flows
Document 2–3 end-to-end integration sequences:
Actor → Container A → Queue → Container B → External SystemInclude happy path and failure branches.
Step 5: Plan rollout phases
| Phase | Integrations | Dependencies | Risk |
Order by dependency and risk (stub externals first).
Step 6: Define observability
Per integration:
- Correlation ID propagation
- Metrics (latency, error rate, throughput)
- Alerts thresholds
Step 7: Validate
Run Validation checklist.
Decision Rules
| Condition | Action |
| No container diagram | Stop; run container-diagram-builder |
| Synchronous chain > 3 hops for user request | Flag latency risk; recommend async |
| No auth on external integration | Flag security finding; block proceed |
| Duplicate integration paths | Consolidate; document single canonical path |
| External SLA unknown | Mark as risk; recommend SLA discovery task |
Validation
- All container diagram connections covered
- Pattern assigned to each integration
- Auth mechanism specified per external integration
- Retry/idempotency rules for async integrations
- ≥2 sequence diagrams for critical flows
- Rollout phases ordered by dependency
- Observability requirements per integration
- Failure handling documented
Anti-patterns
- Point-to-point spaghetti — n×n connections without hub/broker.
- Sync everywhere — blocking chains for non-real-time needs.
- No dead letter queue — lost messages on failure.
- Missing correlation IDs — impossible to trace cross-service requests.
- Big bang integration — all externals at once without phased rollout.
Best Practices
- Prefer events over direct DB sharing between containers.
- Use circuit breakers for external dependencies.
- Stub external systems in early phases.
- Align with api-designer output for REST contracts.
- Document integration ADRs for non-obvious pattern choices.
Output Structure
# Integration Plan: [System Name]
## Integration Inventory
| ID | Source | Target | Pattern | Criticality |
|----|--------|--------|---------|-------------|
## Contracts
### INT-001: [Name]
- Pattern: [type]
- Auth: [method]
- Schema: [reference]
- Retry: [rules]
## Sequence Flows
### Flow 1: [Name]
[Step-by-step sequence]
## Rollout Phases
| Phase | Integrations | Milestone |
|-------|--------------|-----------|
## Observability
| Integration | Metrics | Alerts |
|-------------|---------|--------|
## Risks
| Risk | Mitigation |
|------|------------|Next Skills
| Outcome | Recommended Skill |
| Analyze data movement | architecture/data-flow-analyzer |
| Review integration security | architecture/architecture-review |
| Design APIs | architecture/api-designer |
| Document pattern decision | architecture/adr-generator |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

