agentleFS
patonkikhpatonkikh/APES/skills/product/north-star-metric-advisor/skill.md

north-star-metric-advisor

Skill3 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Define a single north star metric with input metrics, guardrails, and measurement plan that reflects core user value and ladders to business outcomes. Use when working on product discovery, PRDs, user stories, OKRs, or backlog planning.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If value delivery is unclear, stop and request vision or value proposition context.

    line 33
  2. Distinctive:

    Document trade-offs per candidate:

    line 44
  3. Distinctive:

    Document anti-metrics that must NOT degrade while optimizing north star:

    line 81
  4. Distinctive:

    Use the "would users notice if this dropped?" test for NSM candidates.

    line 132

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
skill.md

North Star Metric Advisor

Purpose

Define a single north star metric with input metrics, guardrails, and measurement plan that reflects core user value and ladders to business outcomes.

Input: Product vision or value proposition, business model, user journey, current analytics (optional)
Output: North Star Metric document with definition, input metrics, anti-metrics, and OKR alignment notes Examples: See examples.md for worked input/output.


Workflow

Step 1: Clarify value delivery

Establish:

  • Primary user segment and core job-to-be-done
  • Moment value is delivered (activation, habit, outcome)
  • Business model link (subscription, transaction, ads, marketplace)
  • Current growth stage (pre-PMF, growth, scale)

If value delivery is unclear, stop and request vision or value proposition context.

Step 2: Generate metric candidates

Brainstorm 3–5 candidate metrics. Each must be:

  • Value-reflective — increases when users get more core value
  • Measurable — trackable with existing or feasible instrumentation
  • Actionable — teams can influence it through product changes
  • Leading — predicts retention or revenue, not a lagging finance metric alone

Document trade-offs per candidate:

CandidateProsConsValue link

Step 3: Select north star metric

Apply selection criteria:

CriterionWeightScore (1–5)
Reflects core user valueHigh
Team can move it quarterlyHigh
Correlates with revenue/retentionHigh
Not easily gamedMedium
Measurable within 90 daysMedium

Select exactly one primary north star. Demote others to input metrics or discard.

Write precise definition:

  • Name: [metric]
  • Formula: [numerator / denominator / window]
  • Unit: [count, rate, index]
  • Scope: [all users, active users, paying users]

Step 4: Define input metrics

Identify 3–5 leading indicators that drive the north star:

Input metricRelationship to NSMOwner teamTarget cadence

Each input metric must have a hypothesized causal link, not just correlation.

Step 5: Set guardrails and measurement plan

Document anti-metrics that must NOT degrade while optimizing north star:

Anti-metric / guardrailWhy protectedThreshold

Define baseline, data source, event definitions, and review cadence (weekly/monthly).

Step 6: Validate

Run Validation checklist.


Decision Rules

ConditionAction
No clear user value momentStop; run product-vision-builder or value-proposition-designer
Multiple north stars requestedSelect one primary; others become input metrics
Candidate is revenue-only (MRR, ARR)Reframe to user value metric that drives revenue
Metric is output-based (features shipped)Replace with outcome metric
Metric easily gamed without valueAdd guardrails or redefine formula
No baseline and no instrumentation planDocument "TBD" with 90-day instrumentation milestone
B2B and B2C mixed in one metricSplit by segment or choose dominant model

Validation

  • Exactly one north star metric selected with formula and scope
  • 3–5 input metrics with causal hypotheses
  • Anti-metrics / guardrails documented with thresholds
  • Measurement plan includes baseline and data source
  • Metric reflects user value, not internal output
  • Business model connection explained
  • Review cadence defined

Anti-patterns

  • Revenue as north star — optimizing MRR without user value linkage.
  • Vanity metrics — page views, downloads without retention signal.
  • Composite kitchen-sink metric — unexplainable index nobody can act on.
  • Unmeasurable aspiration — "customer delight score" with no survey or proxy.
  • Gaming without guardrails — NSM rises while churn spikes.

Best Practices

  • Use the "would users notice if this dropped?" test for NSM candidates.
  • Anchor NSM to the aha moment in the user journey.
  • Pair NSM with 2–3 hard guardrails, not dozens of metrics.
  • Revisit NSM at stage transitions (pre-PMF → growth), not monthly.
  • Connect NSM explicitly to OKR objectives in next planning cycle.

Output Structure

# North Star Metric: [Product Name]

## Context
- **Segment:** [primary user]
- **Value moment:** [when value is delivered]
- **Growth stage:** [pre-PMF / growth / scale]
- **Business model:** [how value converts to revenue]

## North Star Metric
- **Metric:** [name]
- **Definition:** [plain language]
- **Formula:** [calculation]
- **Scope:** [population and time window]
- **Baseline:** [current or TBD]
- **Target:** [optional 90-day goal]

## Input Metrics
| Metric | Drives NSM by... | Owner | Baseline |
|--------|------------------|-------|----------|

## Guardrails / Anti-metrics
| Metric | Threshold | Action if breached |
|--------|-----------|-------------------|

## Measurement Plan
- **Data source:** [analytics tool / warehouse]
- **Events required:** [list]
- **Review cadence:** [weekly/monthly]
- **Instrumentation gaps:** [TBD items]

## OKR Alignment Notes
[How objectives should ladder to this NSM]

Next Skills

OutcomeRecommended Skill
Set quarterly goals from NSMproduct/okr-builder
Prioritize features that move input metricsproduct/feature-prioritization
Need full vision documentproduct/product-vision-builder
NSM needs user segment clarityproduct/persona-generator
Write PRD for NSM-driving initiativeproduct/prd-generator

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.