north-star-metric-advisor
Skill3 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Define a single north star metric with input metrics, guardrails, and measurement plan that reflects core user value and ladders to business outcomes. Use when working on product discovery, PRDs, user stories, OKRs, or backlog planning.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- florianbonnet14/ThePowerOfAnalytics_ClaudeSkillstheir own version, first seen Feb 14, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- florianbonnet14/ThePowerOfAnalytics_ClaudeSkills★ 28same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-memory-designerSkill
- ai-cost-optimizerSkill
- ai-evaluation-builderSkill
- ai-latency-optimizerSkill
- ai-solution-architectSkill
- ai-workflow-builderSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- human-in-the-loop-designerSkill
- multi-agent-plannerSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- prompt-optimizerSkill
- prompt-reviewerSkill
- adr-generatorSkill
- api-designerSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- component-diagram-builderSkill
- container-diagram-builderSkill
- data-flow-analyzerSkill
- integration-plannerSkill
- observability-plannerSkill
- scalability-advisorSkill
- solution-architectureSkill
- system-context-builderSkill
- experiment-designerSkill
- go-to-market-plannerSkill
- pricing-strategy-advisorSkill
- mcp-best-practicesSkill
- mcp-client-generatorSkill
- mcp-security-reviewSkill
- mcp-server-generatorSkill
- mcp-tool-generatorSkill
- acceptance-criteria-generatorSkill
- analytics-instrumentation-plannerSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- epic-generatorSkill
- feature-prioritizationSkill
- idea-validatorSkill
- okr-builderSkill
- persona-generatorSkill
- prd-generatorSkill
- problem-statement-builderSkill
- product-discovery-assistantSkill
- product-vision-builderSkill
- sprint-plannerSkill
- story-mappingSkill
- user-story-generatorSkill
- value-proposition-designerSkill
- chunking-strategy-advisorSkill
- embedding-strategy-advisorSkill
- hybrid-search-advisorSkill
- knowledge-ingestion-plannerSkill
- rag-architecture-designerSkill
- retriever-optimizerSkill
- ai-governance-advisorSkill
- ai-threat-modelingSkill
- guardrails-builderSkill
- owasp-llm-reviewerSkill
- prompt-injection-detectorSkill
- skill-nameSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
If value delivery is unclear, stop and request vision or value proposition context.
- Distinctive: line 44
Document trade-offs per candidate:
- Distinctive: line 81
Document anti-metrics that must NOT degrade while optimizing north star:
- Distinctive: line 132
Use the "would users notice if this dropped?" test for NSM candidates.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
North Star Metric Advisor
Purpose
Define a single north star metric with input metrics, guardrails, and measurement plan that reflects core user value and ladders to business outcomes.
Input: Product vision or value proposition, business model, user journey, current analytics (optional)
Output: North Star Metric document with definition, input metrics, anti-metrics, and OKR alignment notes
Examples: See examples.md for worked input/output.
Workflow
Step 1: Clarify value delivery
Establish:
- Primary user segment and core job-to-be-done
- Moment value is delivered (activation, habit, outcome)
- Business model link (subscription, transaction, ads, marketplace)
- Current growth stage (pre-PMF, growth, scale)
If value delivery is unclear, stop and request vision or value proposition context.
Step 2: Generate metric candidates
Brainstorm 3–5 candidate metrics. Each must be:
- Value-reflective — increases when users get more core value
- Measurable — trackable with existing or feasible instrumentation
- Actionable — teams can influence it through product changes
- Leading — predicts retention or revenue, not a lagging finance metric alone
Document trade-offs per candidate:
| Candidate | Pros | Cons | Value link |
Step 3: Select north star metric
Apply selection criteria:
| Criterion | Weight | Score (1–5) |
| Reflects core user value | High | |
| Team can move it quarterly | High | |
| Correlates with revenue/retention | High | |
| Not easily gamed | Medium | |
| Measurable within 90 days | Medium |
Select exactly one primary north star. Demote others to input metrics or discard.
Write precise definition:
- Name: [metric]
- Formula: [numerator / denominator / window]
- Unit: [count, rate, index]
- Scope: [all users, active users, paying users]
Step 4: Define input metrics
Identify 3–5 leading indicators that drive the north star:
| Input metric | Relationship to NSM | Owner team | Target cadence |
Each input metric must have a hypothesized causal link, not just correlation.
Step 5: Set guardrails and measurement plan
Document anti-metrics that must NOT degrade while optimizing north star:
| Anti-metric / guardrail | Why protected | Threshold |
Define baseline, data source, event definitions, and review cadence (weekly/monthly).
Step 6: Validate
Run Validation checklist.
Decision Rules
| Condition | Action |
| No clear user value moment | Stop; run product-vision-builder or value-proposition-designer |
| Multiple north stars requested | Select one primary; others become input metrics |
| Candidate is revenue-only (MRR, ARR) | Reframe to user value metric that drives revenue |
| Metric is output-based (features shipped) | Replace with outcome metric |
| Metric easily gamed without value | Add guardrails or redefine formula |
| No baseline and no instrumentation plan | Document "TBD" with 90-day instrumentation milestone |
| B2B and B2C mixed in one metric | Split by segment or choose dominant model |
Validation
- Exactly one north star metric selected with formula and scope
- 3–5 input metrics with causal hypotheses
- Anti-metrics / guardrails documented with thresholds
- Measurement plan includes baseline and data source
- Metric reflects user value, not internal output
- Business model connection explained
- Review cadence defined
Anti-patterns
- Revenue as north star — optimizing MRR without user value linkage.
- Vanity metrics — page views, downloads without retention signal.
- Composite kitchen-sink metric — unexplainable index nobody can act on.
- Unmeasurable aspiration — "customer delight score" with no survey or proxy.
- Gaming without guardrails — NSM rises while churn spikes.
Best Practices
- Use the "would users notice if this dropped?" test for NSM candidates.
- Anchor NSM to the aha moment in the user journey.
- Pair NSM with 2–3 hard guardrails, not dozens of metrics.
- Revisit NSM at stage transitions (pre-PMF → growth), not monthly.
- Connect NSM explicitly to OKR objectives in next planning cycle.
Output Structure
# North Star Metric: [Product Name]
## Context
- **Segment:** [primary user]
- **Value moment:** [when value is delivered]
- **Growth stage:** [pre-PMF / growth / scale]
- **Business model:** [how value converts to revenue]
## North Star Metric
- **Metric:** [name]
- **Definition:** [plain language]
- **Formula:** [calculation]
- **Scope:** [population and time window]
- **Baseline:** [current or TBD]
- **Target:** [optional 90-day goal]
## Input Metrics
| Metric | Drives NSM by... | Owner | Baseline |
|--------|------------------|-------|----------|
## Guardrails / Anti-metrics
| Metric | Threshold | Action if breached |
|--------|-----------|-------------------|
## Measurement Plan
- **Data source:** [analytics tool / warehouse]
- **Events required:** [list]
- **Review cadence:** [weekly/monthly]
- **Instrumentation gaps:** [TBD items]
## OKR Alignment Notes
[How objectives should ladder to this NSM]Next Skills
| Outcome | Recommended Skill |
| Set quarterly goals from NSM | product/okr-builder |
| Prioritize features that move input metrics | product/feature-prioritization |
| Need full vision document | product/product-vision-builder |
| NSM needs user segment clarity | product/persona-generator |
| Write PRD for NSM-driving initiative | product/prd-generator |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

