agentleFS
markoblogomarkoblogo/abvx-agent-skills/skills/plan-to-issues/SKILL.md

plan-to-issues

Skill16 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Break a PRD, plan, or spec into independently executable vertical slices. Use when a product artifact needs to become agent-ready or human-ready implementation tickets, especially for client, product, and multi-track project workflows. Prefer thin end-to-end slices, explicit blockers, and issue-tracker-neutral output.

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Prefer many thin slices over a few thick ones.

    line 31
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not output horizontal slices like "DB layer", "API layer", "UI layer" unless the parent work truly is infrastructure-only.

    line 48
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep issue-tracker-neutral language.

    line 49
  4. Very specific:

    If the plan is still fuzzy, route back to spec-to-prd or grilling first.

    line 50

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Plan To Issues

Turn a plan into vertical slices that can actually be picked up and shipped.

Workflow

  1. Gather the parent artifact: PRD, plan, or spec.
  2. Explore the repo only enough to understand the real seams.
  3. Break the work into thin vertical slices:
    • end-to-end;
    • verifiable on their own;
    • blocker-aware;
    • small enough to review.
  4. Classify slices:
    • agent-ready;
    • human-required;
    • blocked by decision or external dependency.
  5. Show the proposed breakdown and adjust granularity before publishing or writing it down.

Slice Rules

  • Prefer many thin slices over a few thick ones.
  • Each slice should cut through the relevant layers, not isolate one layer.
  • A completed slice should be demoable, testable, or reviewable on its own.

Output

For each slice include:

  • title;
  • type;
  • what to build;
  • acceptance criteria;
  • blockers;
  • parent reference when relevant.

Rules

  • Do not output horizontal slices like "DB layer", "API layer", "UI layer" unless the parent work truly is infrastructure-only.
  • Keep issue-tracker-neutral language; publish to a tracker only if the workflow calls for it.
  • If the plan is still fuzzy, route back to spec-to-prd or grilling first.

Final Report

Summarize the slice graph, identify the first executable slice, and note what still needs a human decision.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.