dynamic-workflow-packets
Skill16 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Plan and run large Codex tasks with compact dynamic workflow packets, risk gates, integration, and verification. Use when the user explicitly asks for dynamic workflows, packets, subagents, swarm, orchestration, long-running audits, multi-track coding/research work, job or client search agent design, migrations, repo-wide reviews, or tasks where independent discovery, implementation, review, and verification tracks would reduce drift.
In this repository94 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-friction-ledgerSkill
- agent-learning-layer-triageSkill
- agent-operations-contractSkill
- agents-best-practicesSkill
- agent-tool-contract-reviewSkill
- anti-slop-reviewSkill
- architecture-deepening-reviewSkill
- assumption-excavationSkill
- authorized-security-routerSkill
- book-to-skillSkill
- bounded-evaluationSkill
- bounded-growth-loopSkill
- bounded-orchestration-contractSkill
- brief-first-executionSkill
- browser-verificationSkill
- bug-evidence-protocolSkill
- codex-review-loopSkill
- compaction-survivalSkill
- complexity-optimizerSkill
- confidence-fragility-reviewSkill
- context-degradation-reviewSkill
- corporate-surfaceSkill
- delivery-baseline-auditSkill
- delivery-preflight-gateSkill
- design-critique-polishSkill
- designmd-brand-kitSkill
- design-register-bootstrapSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- doc-grounded-grillingSkill
- doc-to-lora-evaluatorSkill
- durable-context-maintenanceSkill
- editorial-surfaceSkill
- evidence-ledger-researchSkill
- filesystem-context-disciplineSkill
- fluid-interaction-reviewSkill
- frontend-product-builderSkill
- frontend-taste-layerSkill
- git-native-context-contractSkill
- goal-loop-designerSkill
- graph-guided-code-readingSkill
- handoffSkill
- happy-handoffSkill
- html-brief-artifactSkill
- html-diagram-artifactSkill
- hypothesis-diversificationSkill
- idea-to-ship-gatesSkill
- knowledge-base-enrichmentSkill
- lean-context-layoutSkill
- local-inference-tuningSkill
- loop-hardening-contractSkill
- loopops-protocolSkill
- loop-readiness-reviewSkill
- lottie-motion-builderSkill
- minimal-diff-builderSkill
- motion-review-gateSkill
- overengineering-reviewSkill
- personal-workspace-routerSkill
- phase-spec-executionSkill
- pipeline-readiness-gateSkill
- plan-to-issuesSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. About 0 are common, 20 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈20
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use this skill to coordinate big work without turning small tasks into process overhead.
- Distinctive: line 16
Use packet orchestration when at least two are true:
- Distinctive: line 25
If the task is small, do it directly and mention that packet orchestration is unnecessary.
- Distinctive: line 32
Keep critical-path work local.
- Distinctive: line 33
Use subagents only if available and appropriate.
- Distinctive: line 36
Verify against the original success criteria.
- Distinctive: line 41
Ask one clear approval question before:
- Distinctive: line 50
If risk is ambiguous, do a read-only inspection, draft the exact action, explain likely effect, then ask.
- Distinctive: line 54
Create a local run directory only for substantial tasks:
- Distinctive: line 128
Use packets for discovery, implementation, tests, docs, security review, and final verification.
- Distinctive: line 132
Use packets for loop design, tool registry, context assembly, memory policy, permission/sandbox review, eval fixtures, observability, and …
- Distinctive: line 136
Use packets for source discovery, primary-source verification, synthesis, counter-evidence, and final citation review.
- Distinctive: line 140
Use packets for market/source mapping, opportunity scoring, profile/resume positioning, outreach drafts, follow-up schedule, CRM schema, …
- Distinctive: line 144
Use packets for inventory, risk triage, deep dives, fix candidates, verification plan, and final report.
- Distinctive: line 148
After packets complete, synthesize:
- Distinctive: line 161
If packets disagree, inspect the authoritative source before choosing.
- Distinctive: line 167
Run the narrowest reliable checks first, then broaden as risk warrants:
- Distinctive: line 179
Do not call the workflow complete until evidence satisfies the original success criteria.
- Distinctive: line 183
When a run produces a reusable pattern, save a concise recipe only if useful:
- Distinctive: line 194
Do not save transcripts, secrets, bulky logs, credentials, private contacts, resumes, or sensitive personal details.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Dynamic Workflow Packets
Use this skill to coordinate big work without turning small tasks into process overhead.
Decision Rule
Use packet orchestration when at least two are true:
- The task has independent coding, research, data, UX, security, docs, review, sourcing, or verification tracks.
- A clear success contract would prevent drift.
- The task is risky, broad, expensive, external-facing, or long-running.
- Separate review would likely catch mistakes.
- The workflow pattern may be reused.
- The user explicitly asks for packets, swarm, subagents, dynamic workflow, or orchestration.
If the task is small, do it directly and mention that packet orchestration is unnecessary.
Operating Contract
- Restate the goal and success criteria.
- Identify risks and approval gates before execution.
- Split only genuinely independent work into packets.
- Keep critical-path work local; delegate or simulate sidecar work.
- Use subagents only if available and appropriate. Otherwise simulate packets with isolated notes.
- Set turn/time/tool budgets and stop rules before any long-running or repeated packet.
- Integrate results explicitly; never paste raw packet dumps as the final answer.
- Verify against the original success criteria.
- Save reusable artifacts only when they will help future work.
Risk Gates
Ask one clear approval question before:
- deleting, overwriting many files, mass-renaming, force-pushing, or rewriting history,
- deploying, publishing, emailing, messaging, posting, applying to jobs, or mutating external systems,
- running migrations, broad codemods, dependency upgrades, or expensive jobs,
- touching credentials, secrets, billing, production data, user accounts, private customer data, resumes, contacts, or outreach history,
- creating public resources or changing third-party accounts,
- spawning many agents or long-running compute.
If risk is ambiguous, do a read-only inspection, draft the exact action, explain likely effect, then ask.
Workflow Artifact
Create a local run directory only for substantial tasks:
.workflow/<slug>/
|-- plan.md
|-- state.json
|-- packets/
|-- results/
`-- final-report.mdFor smaller tasks, keep the packet plan in the chat or a temporary note.
plan.md should contain:
Goal:
Success criteria:
Context:
Constraints:
Risks and approvals:
Packets:
Integration policy:
Verification:
Reusable artifacts:For long-running packets, add:
Budgets:
Checkpoint / resume:
Loop detection:
Scheduler or trigger:
Eval / acceptance noise:Packet Template
Each packet must be bounded and self-contained:
Packet ID:
Objective:
Context:
Sources / files:
Ownership:
Do:
Do not:
Expected output:
Verification:
Risk level:
Status:Good packet types:
- repo discovery,
- API or market research,
- implementation slice,
- tests and fixtures,
- UX/product review,
- security or privacy review,
- job/client sourcing,
- outreach message drafting,
- CRM/data-model design,
- final verification.
For code packets, assign non-overlapping files or modules. Tell workers or simulated packet passes not to revert unrelated changes.
Domain Patterns
Coding
Use packets for discovery, implementation, tests, docs, security review, and final verification. Keep edits scoped by module. The parent agent owns final patch quality and runs the checks.
Agent Harness Work
Use packets for loop design, tool registry, context assembly, memory policy, permission/sandbox review, eval fixtures, observability, and managed-agent deployment boundaries. Keep classifier-based permissions separate from deterministic denial rules.
Research
Use packets for source discovery, primary-source verification, synthesis, counter-evidence, and final citation review. Track source, date, unit, and uncertainty.
Job And Client Search
Use packets for market/source mapping, opportunity scoring, profile/resume positioning, outreach drafts, follow-up schedule, CRM schema, and risk/privacy review. External messages, applications, profile changes, and public posting require user approval.
Long-Running Audits
Use packets for inventory, risk triage, deep dives, fix candidates, verification plan, and final report. Prefer one highest-confidence fix over broad speculative churn.
Integration
After packets complete, synthesize:
Accepted:
Rejected:
Conflicts:
Decisions:
Final changes:
Verification evidence:
Remaining risks:
Reusable follow-up:If packets disagree, inspect the authoritative source before choosing. Reject outputs that are stale, unsupported, duplicate, unsafe, or outside scope.
For subagents, preserve context isolation: give each packet only its needed files, sources, and constraints. The parent agent owns final synthesis, safety decisions, and user-facing claims.
Verification
Run the narrowest reliable checks first, then broaden as risk warrants:
- unit, integration, or e2e tests,
- lint, typecheck, build,
- script dry run,
- browser/UI smoke test,
- source citation check,
- migration dry run,
- outreach/privacy review,
- manual checklist for non-code work.
- eval fixture replay or acceptance-noise check for agent harness changes.
Do not call the workflow complete until evidence satisfies the original success criteria. Report skipped checks honestly.
Reusable Recipes
When a run produces a reusable pattern, save a concise recipe only if useful:
Trigger:
Plan shape:
Packet list:
Approval gates:
Verification checklist:
Known risks:Do not save transcripts, secrets, bulky logs, credentials, private contacts, resumes, or sensitive personal details.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

