loop-readiness-review
Skill16 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Review whether a recurring or semi-autonomous agent loop is ready to run. Use before scheduling Codex, Claude Code, Grok, Opencode, CI, issue triage, PR babysitting, dependency sweeping, changelog drafting, or other repeated agent workflows.
In this repository94 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-friction-ledgerSkill
- agent-learning-layer-triageSkill
- agent-operations-contractSkill
- agents-best-practicesSkill
- agent-tool-contract-reviewSkill
- anti-slop-reviewSkill
- architecture-deepening-reviewSkill
- assumption-excavationSkill
- authorized-security-routerSkill
- book-to-skillSkill
- bounded-evaluationSkill
- bounded-growth-loopSkill
- bounded-orchestration-contractSkill
- brief-first-executionSkill
- browser-verificationSkill
- bug-evidence-protocolSkill
- codex-review-loopSkill
- compaction-survivalSkill
- complexity-optimizerSkill
- confidence-fragility-reviewSkill
- context-degradation-reviewSkill
- corporate-surfaceSkill
- delivery-baseline-auditSkill
- delivery-preflight-gateSkill
- design-critique-polishSkill
- designmd-brand-kitSkill
- design-register-bootstrapSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- doc-grounded-grillingSkill
- doc-to-lora-evaluatorSkill
- durable-context-maintenanceSkill
- dynamic-workflow-packetsSkill
- editorial-surfaceSkill
- evidence-ledger-researchSkill
- filesystem-context-disciplineSkill
- fluid-interaction-reviewSkill
- frontend-product-builderSkill
- frontend-taste-layerSkill
- git-native-context-contractSkill
- goal-loop-designerSkill
- graph-guided-code-readingSkill
- handoffSkill
- happy-handoffSkill
- html-brief-artifactSkill
- html-diagram-artifactSkill
- hypothesis-diversificationSkill
- idea-to-ship-gatesSkill
- knowledge-base-enrichmentSkill
- lean-context-layoutSkill
- local-inference-tuningSkill
- loop-hardening-contractSkill
- loopops-protocolSkill
- lottie-motion-builderSkill
- minimal-diff-builderSkill
- motion-review-gateSkill
- overengineering-reviewSkill
- personal-workspace-routerSkill
- phase-spec-executionSkill
- pipeline-readiness-gateSkill
- plan-to-issuesSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use this skill before turning repeated agent work into a scheduled or recurring loop.
- Distinctive: line 41
run log: what happened, what changed, what failed, and why it stopped.
- Distinctive: line 49
Check the readiness dimensions above.
- Distinctive: line 53
add state file or run log.
- Distinctive: line 58
stop or de-schedule the loop.
- Distinctive: line 76
Do not recommend auto-fix, auto-merge, production deploy, release, or destructive actions without an explicit human gate.
- Distinctive: line 77
Do not promote a loop beyond report-only without durable state and a run log.
- Distinctive: line 78
Do not promote beyond proposal-first without verifier evidence and rollback or discard path.
- Distinctive: line 79
Do not let the loop judge its own safety claims.
- Distinctive: line 80
Do not add scheduling when a one-shot task or manual checklist is enough.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Loop Readiness Review
Use this skill before turning repeated agent work into a scheduled or recurring loop.
Use When
- a workflow may run on a cadence: cron, automation,
/loop, GitHub Actions, or external scheduler; - a runner will open worktrees, inspect CI, triage issues, update changelogs, watch PRs, or sweep dependencies;
- a SET bundle is being handed to a loop-capable orchestrator;
- a report-only loop is being promoted toward auto-fix or PR creation;
- you need to decide whether the loop is L0, L1, L2, or L3 ready.
Readiness Levels
L0: not loop-ready; missing state, verifier, or human gate.L1: report-only; can read, summarize, and propose actions.L2: proposal-first; can create retained output, worktree changes, or draft PRs behind review gates.L3: governed loop; has state, isolation, verifier, budget, run log, rollback/escalation, and human-controlled settlement.
Readiness Checks
Review:
- cadence: trigger, frequency, quiet hours, stop rule;
- state:
STATE.md, run ledger, or other durable memory outside the model; - scope: allowed repos, paths, issues, branches, and denied targets;
- isolation: worktree, branch, sandbox, or retained-output directory;
- skills: triage, implementer, verifier, review lenses, and escalation roles;
- connectors: MCP, GitHub, CI, email, calendar, or other external tools with least privilege;
- verifier: deterministic checks, bounded eval, CI, human review, or maker/checker split;
- budget: token, time, run count, retry, and spend caps;
- run log: what happened, what changed, what failed, and why it stopped;
- human gate: approval boundary for writes, merges, releases, destructive actions, or external side effects;
- rollback: how to discard, revert, close, or pause the loop.
Workflow
- Identify the loop pattern and intended cadence.
- Classify the current readiness level.
- Check the readiness dimensions above.
- List blockers that prevent promotion to the next level.
- Recommend the smallest next step:
- keep report-only;
- add state file or run log;
- add verifier;
- add worktree isolation;
- add budget caps;
- add human gate;
- stop or de-schedule the loop.
Output Shape
Use:
- loop name or pattern;
- current level:
L0,L1,L2, orL3; - intended next level;
- checks passed;
- blockers;
- budget and stop rules;
- human gate;
- smallest next step;
- decision:
not-ready,report-only,proposal-first, orgoverned.
Guardrails
- Do not recommend auto-fix, auto-merge, production deploy, release, or destructive actions without an explicit human gate.
- Do not promote a loop beyond report-only without durable state and a run log.
- Do not promote beyond proposal-first without verifier evidence and rollback or discard path.
- Do not let the loop judge its own safety claims.
- Do not add scheduling when a one-shot task or manual checklist is enough.
Pair With
context-degradation-reviewbefore long loop handoffs or memory-heavy runs.filesystem-context-disciplineforSTATE.md, run logs, retained outputs, and proposal folders.bounded-evaluationfor verifier and maker/checker gates.reversible-agent-taskfor proposal-first worktree or retained-output settlement.agent-tool-contract-reviewfor MCP, CLI, and GitHub Action inputs used by the loop.loop-hardening-contractfor runtime-path sprint packets, measured harness stripping, and broken-window revalidation without automatic revert.
Provenance
Adapted from loop readiness and loop engineering patterns in cobusgreyling/loop-engineering, narrowed into an ABVX review skill rather than a loop runtime.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

