agentleFS
markoblogomarkoblogo/abvx-agent-skills/skills/delivery-baseline-audit/SKILL.md

delivery-baseline-audit

Skill16 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Audit claimed delivery against the starting baseline and the current working tree. Use when a task has declared deliverables, when a long run might say 'done' before shipping real changes, or when final verification must check the actual artifact set rather than only the transcript or commits.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Verify that the promised deliverables actually exist relative to where the work started.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Check the whole working tree, not only committed diffs.

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    Treat missing deliverables as a gap even if the narrative sounds complete.

    line 26
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not audit only what was committed if the working tree still matters.

    line 54
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not rely on a prior mid-task pass as the final audit.

    line 55
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not mark complete when a declared deliverable is absent or unverifiable.

    line 56

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Delivery Baseline Audit

Verify that the promised deliverables actually exist relative to where the work started.

Use When

  • the task names files, features, screens, commands, or other concrete deliverables;
  • the implementation ran through multiple phases or retries;
  • the working tree may contain staged, unstaged, or untracked work that matters;
  • "agent said done" is not enough evidence.

Core Rules

  • Compare against the starting baseline, not just the latest transcript claim.
  • Check the whole working tree, not only committed diffs.
  • Re-run final mandatory commands once at the end for cross-phase regressions.
  • Treat missing deliverables as a gap even if the narrative sounds complete.

Workflow

  1. Capture or identify the baseline reference before major work starts.
  2. List the declared deliverables and acceptance criteria.
  3. At the end, inspect the full working tree relative to that baseline:
    • committed changes;
    • staged changes;
    • unstaged changes;
    • deletions;
    • untracked deliverables.
  4. Re-run the final mandatory verification commands.
  5. Spot-check each deliverable against its declared acceptance criteria.
  6. Report gaps explicitly and fix them before calling the task complete.

Audit Output

Include:

  • baseline reference used;
  • deliverables checked;
  • commands re-run;
  • gaps found;
  • fix-needed or complete verdict.

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not audit only what was committed if the working tree still matters.
  • Do not rely on a prior mid-task pass as the final audit.
  • Do not mark complete when a declared deliverable is absent or unverifiable.

Final Report

State whether completion was confirmed against baseline, partially confirmed, or blocked by missing evidence.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.