browser-verification
Skill16 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Verify frontend changes in a real browser, including layout, console errors, responsive states, network failures, screenshots, and interactions. Use after local or deployed web UI changes, visual fixes, forms, navigation, asset updates, canvas or 3D work, or whenever browser verification should replace static guessing.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- SWEStash/swe-workflow-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- arslanvuzmal/VoxCircuittheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatchertheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
- khuynh22/agent-dev-teamtheir own version, first seen Aug 31, 2026
- motao123/dev-workflow-kittheir own version, first seen Jun 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use incident-response.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillincident-response
Run an incident response workflow — triage, communicate, and write postmortem. Trigger with "we have an incident", "production is down", an alert that needs severity assessment, a status update mid-incident, or when writing a blameless postmortem after resolution.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcher★ 59same name
- khuynh22/agent-dev-team★ 9same name
- arslanvuzmal/VoxCircuit★ 2same name
- motao123/dev-workflow-kit★ 1same name
- SWEStash/swe-workflow-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository94 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-friction-ledgerSkill
- agent-learning-layer-triageSkill
- agent-operations-contractSkill
- agents-best-practicesSkill
- agent-tool-contract-reviewSkill
- anti-slop-reviewSkill
- architecture-deepening-reviewSkill
- assumption-excavationSkill
- authorized-security-routerSkill
- book-to-skillSkill
- bounded-evaluationSkill
- bounded-growth-loopSkill
- bounded-orchestration-contractSkill
- brief-first-executionSkill
- bug-evidence-protocolSkill
- codex-review-loopSkill
- compaction-survivalSkill
- complexity-optimizerSkill
- confidence-fragility-reviewSkill
- context-degradation-reviewSkill
- corporate-surfaceSkill
- delivery-baseline-auditSkill
- delivery-preflight-gateSkill
- design-critique-polishSkill
- designmd-brand-kitSkill
- design-register-bootstrapSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- doc-grounded-grillingSkill
- doc-to-lora-evaluatorSkill
- durable-context-maintenanceSkill
- dynamic-workflow-packetsSkill
- editorial-surfaceSkill
- evidence-ledger-researchSkill
- filesystem-context-disciplineSkill
- fluid-interaction-reviewSkill
- frontend-product-builderSkill
- frontend-taste-layerSkill
- git-native-context-contractSkill
- goal-loop-designerSkill
- graph-guided-code-readingSkill
- handoffSkill
- happy-handoffSkill
- html-brief-artifactSkill
- html-diagram-artifactSkill
- hypothesis-diversificationSkill
- idea-to-ship-gatesSkill
- knowledge-base-enrichmentSkill
- lean-context-layoutSkill
- local-inference-tuningSkill
- loop-hardening-contractSkill
- loopops-protocolSkill
- loop-readiness-reviewSkill
- lottie-motion-builderSkill
- minimal-diff-builderSkill
- motion-review-gateSkill
- overengineering-reviewSkill
- personal-workspace-routerSkill
- phase-spec-executionSkill
- pipeline-readiness-gateSkill
- plan-to-issuesSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Prefer the repo's existing Playwright setup.
- Distinctive: line 19
Use a local static or dev server when file URLs would not match production behavior.
- Distinctive: line 25
Start the app or static server.
- Distinctive: line 27
Check console errors and failed network requests.
- Distinctive: line 28
Verify key selectors render and have nonzero bounding boxes.
- Distinctive: line 29
Verify images/assets are complete and natural dimensions are nonzero.
- Distinctive: line 30
Check desktop and mobile viewports.
- Very specific: line 31
Check horizontal overflow: document.documentElement.scrollWidth <= innerWidth + 1.
- Distinctive: line 34
Stop local servers before finalizing.
- Distinctive: line 39
no failed requests for CSS, JS, images, fonts, or data.
- Distinctive: line 40
no severe console errors;
- Distinctive: line 48
Do not commit local Playwright tooling unless the repo already owns browser tests.
- Distinctive: line 49
Do not claim visual verification if only static checks ran.
- Distinctive: line 50
If browser install fails, report the fallback checks honestly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Browser Verification
Trust the browser, not static guesses. Use real rendering for frontend claims.
Setup
Prefer the repo's existing Playwright setup. If none exists, install browser tooling in a local tool directory or temporary environment rather than adding a production dependency.
Use a local static or dev server when file URLs would not match production behavior.
For security review of live targets, request routing through authorized-security-router first so scope, allowed actions, and non-destructive boundaries are explicit.
Verification Loop
- Start the app or static server.
- Open the target URL in a browser-controlled session.
- Check console errors and failed network requests.
- Verify key selectors render and have nonzero bounding boxes.
- Verify images/assets are complete and natural dimensions are nonzero.
- Check desktop and mobile viewports.
- Check horizontal overflow:
document.documentElement.scrollWidth <= innerWidth + 1. - Exercise the primary interaction path.
- Capture screenshots only when useful for review or debugging.
- Stop local servers before finalizing.
Common Assertions
- page loaded with expected title or heading;
- no failed requests for CSS, JS, images, fonts, or data;
- no severe console errors;
- target controls are visible and enabled;
- form submission or navigation reaches expected state;
- responsive layout has no text overlap or horizontal scroll;
- animated/canvas/3D surfaces have nonblank rendered pixels when relevant.
Guardrails
- Do not commit local Playwright tooling unless the repo already owns browser tests.
- Do not claim visual verification if only static checks ran.
- If browser install fails, report the fallback checks honestly.
- For authenticated or paid flows, avoid real side effects unless explicitly approved.
Final Report
Include URLs, viewports, checks run, commands, failures found, and whether screenshots were captured.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

