plan-to-issues
Skill74 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turns a work plan discussed in the current conversation into a structured set of GitHub issues in the corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin repo: one parent epic issue plus one child issue per logical task, grouped by a milestone and typed with labels. Use whenever the user says "заведи задачи", "создай issues", "разбей план на задачи", "plan to issues", "план в issues", "нарежь план", "нарезать план", "заведи эпик", "create epic", "split plan into tasks", or asks to turn a plan / roadmap / TODO discussed in chat into tracked GitHub work items. Also trigger when the user pastes a plan and asks to "заведи это в гитхаб" / "put this in github" / "make issues out of this".
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- TanKaizokuO/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- prestarius/jet-skills-stacktheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- cdifulv/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- markoblogo/abvx-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 14, 2026
- BrianProcopio/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 28, 2026
- JeremyDev87/codingbuddytheir own version, first seen Apr 11, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- JeremyDev87/codingbuddy★ 31same name
- markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills★ 16same name
- cdifulv/skills★ 1same name
- prestarius/jet-skills-stack★ 1same name
- BrianProcopio/claude-skills★ 0same name
- TanKaizokuO/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- public/llms.txtllms.txt
- commitSkill
- releaseSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
English only: Every issue — title, body, labels, milestone title and description — MUST be written in English, regardless of the language …
- Very specific: line 41
Never invent tasks: If the plan is vague on a point, mark it in the issue as > ⚠ Assumption: rather than silently filling gaps.
- Distinctive: line 55
If you truly can't find a plan in the context, stop and ask the user to paste it — do not fabricate.
- Distinctive: line 89
Before creating issues, ensure the labels you're about to apply exist.
- Very specific: line 102
Do NOT recreate existing labels.
- Very specific: line 120
If a milestone with the same title already exists, reuse it: list with gh api repos/:owner/:repo/milestones -q '.[] | {number,title}' and …
- Very specific: line 141
Write the body to a temp file first (bodies are long and multiline).
- Very specific: line 215
After all children exist, create the parent epic.
- Distinctive: line 280
Do not: delete milestones or labels, even if they look stale.
- Very specific: line 281
If gh returns an error (rate limit, permission, network), stop, report what succeeded and what didn't, and let the user decide whether to …
- Distinctive: line 283
Do not retry destructive operations silently.
- Very specific: line 287
Delete /tmp/plan-to-issues-*.md scratch files after successful creation.
- Distinctive: line 288
Leave them if any step failed, so a retry can reuse them.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Plan → GitHub Issues
Turn a plan already discussed in this conversation into a tracked set of GitHub issues. No file input, no URL fetching — the plan lives in the chat history above the invocation. Read it, split it, ship it.
Repo is fixed: corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin (this project). All gh commands
run against the current repo — do not pass --repo.
Non-negotiables
- English only. Every issue — title, body, labels, milestone title and description — MUST be written in English, regardless of the language the plan was discussed in. Translate the plan as you split it. This is non-negotiable: never publish Russian, Ukrainian, or any other language to GitHub. If a term is a project-specific proper noun (node type name, file path, CLI flag, tool name) keep it verbatim; everything else is English prose.
- Create immediately. The user has pre-authorised issue creation for this skill. Do not ask "shall I create these?" Do the work and report what was created.
- Every child issue is self-contained — a coding agent must be able to open the issue and start work with zero extra context. That means: goal, motivation, files/areas, acceptance criteria, verification, and links to related tasks are all inside the body.
- Never invent tasks. If the plan is vague on a point, mark it in the
issue as
> ⚠ Assumption:rather than silently filling gaps. - Never post secrets or internal URLs into issue bodies. Redact if the chat history contains any.
Workflow
1. Extract the plan from context
Scroll the current conversation for the plan. Signals: a numbered list of steps, a bulleted roadmap, a "TODO / next steps" block, or a design outline the user explicitly called a plan. If there are competing plans, use the most recent one the user endorsed.
If you truly can't find a plan in the context, stop and ask the user to paste it — do not fabricate.
2. Split into logical tasks
Each task should be:
- Independently shippable — mergeable as its own PR.
- Bounded — a coding agent can finish it in one focused sitting.
- Ordered by dependency — if B needs A merged first, list A first and record the dependency in B.
Aim for 3–10 child tasks. If the plan naturally produces 1–2, skip the epic and just create standalone issues. If it produces 15+, group into phases and make each phase its own child (with sub-bullets inside the body) rather than one issue per micro-step.
3. Classify each task → label
Map the task's dominant nature to an existing repo label:
| Task nature | Label |
| New capability, new tool, new skill, new node type | enhancement |
| Fixing broken behaviour | bug |
| Docs, README, comments, examples | documentation |
| Refactor, cleanup, dead-code removal | refactor (create if missing — see step 4) |
| Test-only work | tests (create if missing) |
One primary label per issue. Add ai (existing repo label) to every issue
this skill creates, so they're easy to filter later.
4. Ensure labels exist
Before creating issues, ensure the labels you're about to apply exist. Run:
gh label list --limit 200 --json name -q '.[].name'For each label you need that's missing, create it:
gh label create refactor --color "fbca04" --description "Code refactor / cleanup"
gh label create tests --color "0e8a16" --description "Test-only changes"Do NOT recreate existing labels; gh label create errors on duplicates.
5. Create the milestone
Name the milestone from the plan's headline goal, kept short (≤50 chars). Example: "Convctl streaming refactor", "Marketplace publish v2".
gh api repos/:owner/:repo/milestones \
--method POST \
-f title="<milestone title>" \
-f description="<one-line summary of the plan>" \
-f state="open" \
--jq '.number'Capture the returned milestone number — child issues need it.
If a milestone with the same title already exists, reuse it: list with
gh api repos/:owner/:repo/milestones -q '.[] | {number,title}' and pick
the matching number.
6. Create child issues
For each task, in dependency order, create an issue with the full body template below. Capture each returned issue number — the epic will link them.
gh issue create \
--title "<type>: <short imperative title>" \
--label "<primary-label>,ai" \
--milestone <milestone-number> \
--body-file /tmp/plan-to-issues-child-N.mdTitle format: <type>: <imperative summary> where <type> is one of
feat, fix, docs, refactor, test, chore — matches the repo's
commit convention (see .claude/skills/commit/SKILL.md).
Write the body to a temp file first (bodies are long and multiline). Use
this template verbatim, filling every section — do not omit sections; if a
section is genuinely N/A, write _None._ so the reader knows it was
considered.
## Goal
<One-sentence outcome. What does "done" look like from the outside?>
## Context
<Why this task exists. Link back to the plan / conversation motivation.
If it's part of a larger effort, state that here. Include background a
fresh coding agent would not otherwise have.>
## Scope
**In scope:**
- <specific change 1>
- <specific change 2>
**Out of scope:**
- <thing that might look adjacent but is a separate task>
## Files / areas to touch
- `path/to/file.go` — <what changes here>
- `path/to/other.md` — <what changes here>
<If the exact files aren't known yet, list the directory or module and mark
it `> ⚠ Assumption: agent to confirm exact files during discovery.`>
## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] <observable behaviour 1>
- [ ] <observable behaviour 2>
- [ ] <docs / changelog updated if applicable>
- [ ] <existing tests still green>
## Verification
<Exact commands the agent should run before opening a PR. Prefer the
project's canonical commands from CLAUDE.md.>
```bash
cd plugins/corezoid/mcp-server
go build ./...
go vet ./...
go test -race ./...Dependencies
- Blocked by: #
<issue-number-or-none> - Blocks: #
<issue-number-or-none> - Related: #
<issue-number-or-none>
Notes
<Optional. Edge cases, gotchas, links to node-structures.md sections, lint rules, prior PRs. Anything a coding agent would ask before starting.>
Fill `Blocked by` on later issues by referencing earlier child numbers you
already captured. `Blocks` and `Related` can be filled after all children
exist — patch the body in a second pass if needed:
```bash
gh issue edit <N> --body-file /tmp/plan-to-issues-child-N.md7. Create the parent epic
After all children exist, create the parent epic. Its body is a task list of
child issues — GitHub renders - [ ] #N as a live tracked sub-issue.
gh issue create \
--title "Epic: <plan headline>" \
--label "enhancement,ai" \
--milestone <milestone-number> \
--body-file /tmp/plan-to-issues-epic.mdEpic body template:
## Goal
<One-paragraph description of the plan and the outcome once all sub-tasks land.>
## Motivation
<Why now, who asked, what problem this solves. Pull from the conversation.>
## Sub-tasks
- [ ] #<child-1>
- [ ] #<child-2>
- [ ] #<child-3>
## Milestone
Tracked under milestone: **<milestone title>**.
## Notes
<Optional. Cross-cutting concerns, rollout order, feature flags, risk.>8. Back-link children to the epic (best-effort)
For each child, append Part of #<epic-number> to the top of its body so
the linkage is visible on the child page too. Use gh issue edit --body-file.
Skip if this would double the work for a plan with only 2–3 children.
9. Report to the user
Output a compact summary — no fluff:
Epic: #<epic-number> <title>
Milestone: <title> (#<milestone-number>)
Children:
#<n> <type>: <title>
#<n> <type>: <title>
...Include full URLs only if the user asked for them explicitly.
Guardrails
- Do not open PRs, push branches, or run any code changes — this skill only files work items.
- Do not assign issues to users unless the user in this session named a specific GitHub handle to assign.
- Do not close or edit existing unrelated issues.
- Do not delete milestones or labels, even if they look stale.
- If
ghreturns an error (rate limit, permission, network), stop, report what succeeded and what didn't, and let the user decide whether to retry. Do not retry destructive operations silently.
Cleanup
Delete /tmp/plan-to-issues-*.md scratch files after successful creation.
Leave them if any step failed, so a retry can reuse them.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

