smoke-check
Skill40 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run the critical-path smoke gate before QA hand-off. Executes the automated suite, verifies the core user flows defined in the QA plan, and produces a PASS/FAIL report. A failed smoke check means the build is not ready for QA.
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiostheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studiostheir own version, first seen Oct 19, 2026
- xmtp/libxmtptheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- venus2099/codex-game-studiostheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 5, 2026
- SimonKreis-Richard/oracle-fusion-agentic-toolkittheir own version, first seen Sep 27, 2026
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- xmtp/libxmtp★ 127same name
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 118same name
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 17same name
- lilangMax/ClaudeCodeGameStudios★ 8same name
- hongyuanc/codex-game-studios★ 5same name
- dawn840705/claude-code-studios★ 1same name
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Plugin★ 1same name
- venus2099/codex-game-studios★ 1same name
- SimonKreis-Richard/oracle-fusion-agentic-toolkit★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository77 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- design/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- src/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- tests/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adoptSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- asset-auditSkill
- asset-specSkill
- balance-checkSkill
- brainstormSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- bug-triageSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- content-auditSkill
- create-architectureSkill
- create-control-manifestSkill
- create-epicsSkill
- create-storiesSkill
- day-one-patchSkill
- design-bibleSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-storySkill
- estimateSkill
- extractSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- helpSkill
- hotfixSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- localizeSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- onboardSkill
- patch-notesSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- prd-reviewSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- propagate-design-changeSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qa-planSkill
- quick-designSkill
- regression-suiteSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- review-all-prdsSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- security-auditSkill
- setup-frameworkSkill
- skill-improveSkill
- skill-testSkill
- soak-testSkill
- sprint-planSkill
- sprint-statusSkill
- startSkill
- story-doneSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 34
Read tests/smoke/critical-paths.md.
- Distinctive: line 37
If missing, fall back to the default smoke set:
- Distinctive: line 52
Run the unit + integration test suite first.
- Distinctive: line 64
If the unit or integration suite fails, stop here with verdict FAIL and list the failing tests.
- Distinctive: line 80
If a smoke flow does not yet have automation, fall back to a manual walkthrough.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Smoke Check
A short, blocking gate that runs before manual QA invests time. If smoke fails, manual QA stops and the build goes back to engineering.
Phase 1: Confirm Build and Target
Parse --build (path to .ipa / .apk / app bundle) and --target (sim,
emulator, or attached device). If neither is given, infer:
- React Native: prompt to run
npx react-native run-iosorrun-android. - Flutter: prompt to run
flutter runagainst the target. - iOS native: locate the most recent build under
~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData. - Android native: locate the most recent
app-debug.apkunderapp/build/outputs/apk/.
Confirm with the user before launching anything.
Phase 2: Read the Smoke Spec
Read tests/smoke/critical-paths.md. This file is authored by /qa-plan
and lists the smoke flows for the current sprint.
If missing, fall back to the default smoke set:
- Cold start within the budgeted ms.
- App reaches a stable home/landing screen.
- Sign-in (or guest path) succeeds.
- Primary CTA on home reaches its destination without a crash.
- App backgrounds and foregrounds without state loss.
- Sign-out completes cleanly.
Surface the spec to the user and confirm scope.
Phase 3: Run the Automated Suite
Run the unit + integration test suite first. The smoke gate is "build is shippable for manual QA", so a red automated suite is automatic FAIL.
Per framework via Bash:
- React Native:
npx jest --silent --reporters=default --bail=false - Flutter:
flutter test --machine - iOS:
xcodebuild test -scheme [scheme] -destination 'platform=iOS Simulator,name=[device]' - Android:
./gradlew testDebugUnitTest connectedAndroidTest
Capture pass/fail counts and any failure output.
If the unit or integration suite fails, stop here with verdict FAIL and list the failing tests.
Phase 4: Run E2E Smoke Flows
For each smoke flow in the spec, run the corresponding automated flow:
- Maestro:
maestro test tests/smoke/.maestro/[flow].yaml - Detox:
detox test --configuration ios.sim.debug --testNamePattern smoke - XCUITest:
xcodebuild test -only-testing:UITests/SmokeUITests - Espresso:
./gradlew connectedAndroidTest -PtestFilter=SmokeTest
Capture per-flow PASS / FAIL / TIMEOUT and the device the flow ran on.
If a smoke flow does not yet have automation, fall back to a manual walkthrough. Use AskUserQuestion per flow:
question: "Smoke flow: [name]\n[steps]"
options:
- "PASS — flow completed without issue"
- "FAIL — describe what broke"
- "BLOCKED — cannot reach this flow"Phase 5: Mobile Health Probes
While the build is on a target, capture quick mobile-health metrics:
- Cold start time on Tier A device (if instrumented).
- Memory after reaching home screen.
- App size on disk.
- Crash log presence — read the device's crash report directory and flag any crash dated within the smoke run window.
- Frame drops during the primary navigation path (if a perf marker is available).
Compare each value to the budget in
.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md. A red probe demotes the verdict
to FAIL even if every smoke flow passed.
Phase 6: Render the Verdict
## Smoke Check — [build] — [date]
Target: [device + OS]
Tester: [name]
### Automated Suite
- Unit: [pass]/[total]
- Integration: [pass]/[total]
- E2E smoke: [pass]/[total]
[failures listed verbatim]
### Smoke Flows
| Flow | Result | Notes |
|------|--------|-------|
| Cold start | PASS | 1.6s on iPhone 14 |
| Sign-in | PASS | |
| Foreground/background | FAIL | state lost on resume |
### Mobile Health
- Cold start: 1.6s (budget 2.0s) PASS
- Memory at home: 142 MB (budget 200 MB) PASS
- Crashes during run: 0
- App size on disk: 78 MB (budget 100 MB) PASS
### Verdict: PASS / PASS WITH WARNINGS / FAIL
[If not PASS, list specifically what must be fixed before re-running.]Verdict rules:
- PASS — every automated suite is green, every smoke flow passes, every health probe is within budget.
- PASS WITH WARNINGS — automated suite green, all smoke flows pass, but a non-blocking health probe (e.g., memory usage trending upward but inside budget). Document and continue.
- FAIL — any of: red automated suite, failing smoke flow, crash during the run, or a health probe out of budget.
Phase 7: Save Report and Update State
Ask before writing:
production/qa/smoke-[date].md— the verdict report.
Append to production/session-state/active.md:
## Smoke Check — [date]
- Target: [device]
- Verdict: [verdict]
- Failing flows: [list or none]
- Next: [/team-qa | fix listed issues then re-run /smoke-check]Quality Gates / PASS-FAIL
This skill IS the gate. The verdict it emits is binding for downstream QA work.
Examples
Example 1 — sprint-end smoke on iOS sim:
Jest 124/124, smoke flows 6/6, cold start 1.4s on iPhone 14, no crashes.
Verdict: PASS. /team-qa sprint-04 may proceed.
Example 2 — pre-release smoke on physical Pixel:
Jest 124/124, but Maestro flow foreground-background fails because the
app crashes on resume. Verdict: FAIL. Producer is told to fix before
manual QA starts.
Next Steps
- PASS -> run
/team-qa [sprint]to execute the manual cycle. - FAIL -> open a bug via
/bug-report, fix, re-run/smoke-check. - PASS WITH WARNINGS -> note the warnings in the QA sign-off.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

