bug-triage
Skill40 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Read all open bugs, re-evaluate priority and severity, surface systemic trends, and assign each to a sprint or backlog. Run at sprint start or when the open bug count grows beyond comfort.
29 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiostheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- OrchestratorInc/agent-orchestratortheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- Untrivial-ai/agent-orchestratortheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- nadavnaveh/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- quocld/hephaestus-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studiostheir own version, first seen Oct 19, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ao-desktop-dev and pr-description.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
agentlab-inSkillao-desktop-dev
Launch, restart, or troubleshoot the real AO Electron desktop app from this repository; run a checkout against isolated or real local AO data; combine PR branches for local UI review; and diagnose stale Electron processes, port conflicts, or preload bridge mismatches. Use whenever asked to run, open, show, or visually verify AO frontend changes in the actual desktop app rather than ao preview, dev:web, or mock data.
Also in 5 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillpr-description
Draft Nacelle PR titles, pull request descriptions, commit titles, commit descriptions, and squash commit messages. Use when asked for PR or commit wording, a branch summary, or a PR description that can be used in a commit. Omit validation sections from commit bodies and remove filler.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions29 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 29
- symfony/symfony★ 32ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- apify/apify-mcp-server★ 15ksame name
- AgentWrapper/agent-orchestrator★ 14ksame name
- ComposioHQ/agent-orchestrator★ 14ksame name
- OrchestratorInc/agent-orchestrator★ 14ksame name
- Untrivial-ai/agent-orchestrator★ 14ksame name
- phase-rs/phase★ 323same name
- jMerta/codex-skills★ 130same name
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 118same name
19 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository77 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- design/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- src/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- tests/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adoptSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- asset-auditSkill
- asset-specSkill
- balance-checkSkill
- brainstormSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- content-auditSkill
- create-architectureSkill
- create-control-manifestSkill
- create-epicsSkill
- create-storiesSkill
- day-one-patchSkill
- design-bibleSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-storySkill
- estimateSkill
- extractSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- helpSkill
- hotfixSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- localizeSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- onboardSkill
- patch-notesSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- prd-reviewSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- propagate-design-changeSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qa-planSkill
- quick-designSkill
- regression-suiteSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- review-all-prdsSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- security-auditSkill
- setup-frameworkSkill
- skill-improveSkill
- skill-testSkill
- smoke-checkSkill
- soak-testSkill
- sprint-planSkill
- sprint-statusSkill
- startSkill
- story-doneSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 27 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 54
Read recent telemetry summary if present (production/qa/telemetry-summary.md) and use it to inform the calls.
- Distinctive: line 81
If a cluster has 3+ bugs, flag it as a systemic trend and propose:
- Distinctive: line 98
Read the active sprint plan to estimate available capacity.
- Distinctive: line 102
Use AskUserQuestion to confirm the schedule per cluster.
- Very specific: line 117
If assigned to a sprint, add Sprint: [sprint-id].
- Very specific: line 162
Ask: "May I write this to production/qa/triage-[date].md?"
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 27 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Bug Triage
Bring the bug backlog back under control. Read every open bug, refresh priorities against current reality, group by symptom, and assign each bug an owner and a sprint.
Phase 1: Inventory
Glob production/qa/bugs/BUG-*.md. Read each whose Status is Open,
In Progress, or Reopened. Skip Closed, WontFix, Duplicate.
Capture per bug:
- ID, title
- Current severity, priority, status
- Affected platforms
- Affected build (and whether that build is still relevant)
- Frequency
- File date
- Suspected area / module
- Last update date
Optional argument --since=<date> filters to bugs filed after a date.
Phase 2: Re-evaluate Each Bug
For every bug, ask whether the current severity/priority still fits. Drivers of re-evaluation:
- Build relevance — if the affected build is now several releases old, can the bug still be reproduced? Surface for user to confirm.
- Workaround stability — if a documented workaround has stopped working, severity goes up.
- Frequency drift — telemetry numbers (Crashlytics, Sentry) may show the bug occurring more or less often than at filing time.
- Business context — paywall bugs near a marketing push, auth bugs near an enterprise rollout, push bugs near a re-engagement campaign all elevate priority.
- Age — open longer than 30 days at S2 or above is a smell.
Read recent telemetry summary if present
(production/qa/telemetry-summary.md) and use it to inform the calls.
For each bug, propose new severity/priority. Use AskUserQuestion in batches:
question: "BUG-NNN: [title]\nCurrent: S[X]/P[Y] — proposed: S[A]/P[B]\nReason: [reason]"
options:
- "Accept proposal"
- "Keep current"
- "Override — let me set values"
- "Close — fixed / not reproducible / wontfix (specify)"Phase 3: Detect Systemic Trends
Cluster the open bugs:
- By module (auth, paywall, sync, push, navigation).
- By symptom (crash, ANR, freeze, layout, copy, network, payment).
- By platform (iOS-only, Android-only, both).
- By cause hypothesis (race condition, leaked subscription, missing null check, deprecated API).
If a cluster has 3+ bugs, flag it as a systemic trend and propose:
- An ADR or refactor story to address the root.
- A regression test family for the cluster.
- A specific subagent or specialist to drive the fix.
Phase 4: Assign Sprints
For each open bug remaining, propose a sprint slot:
- P0 -> active sprint (interrupts current work).
- P1 -> active sprint or next sprint (capacity-permitting).
- P2 -> next sprint.
- P3 -> backlog with revisit-by date (default +60 days).
Read the active sprint plan to estimate available capacity. If a sprint is full, flag overflow and ask the user to choose between bumping P3s, deferring P2s, or expanding the sprint.
Use AskUserQuestion to confirm the schedule per cluster.
Phase 5: Update Bug Files
For each bug whose severity, priority, or sprint changed, ask: "May I update [bug path]?"
On approval, edit:
Severity: S[N]Priority: P[N]Status: [In Progress / Open / Closed / WontFix]- Append a
## Triage [date]note with the reasoning. - If assigned to a sprint, add
Sprint: [sprint-id].
For closed bugs, add a ## Resolution [date] note with the closing
reason (Fixed in [commit], Not Reproducible, Duplicate of BUG-NNN,
WontFix because [reason]).
Phase 6: Render the Triage Report
# Bug Triage Report — [date]
Bugs reviewed: [N]
- Severity changes: [count]
- Priority changes: [count]
- Closed during triage: [count]
- New systemic trends flagged: [count]
## By Severity
| Severity | Open count | New since last triage |
|----------|------------|------------------------|
| S1 | 0 | 0 |
| S2 | 3 | 1 |
| S3 | 11 | 4 |
| S4 | 7 | 2 |
## Systemic Trends
- Cluster: [description] — [N] bugs — recommend [action]
## Sprint Assignments
| Bug | Title | Severity | Priority | Sprint |
|-----|-------|----------|----------|--------|
## Closed During Triage
| Bug | Reason |
## Backlog (P3)
[N] bugs, revisit by [date]
## Recommendations
- [action]
- [action]Ask: "May I write this to production/qa/triage-[date].md?"
Phase 7: Update Session State
Append to production/session-state/active.md:
## Bug Triage — [date]
- Reviewed: [N]
- Open S1/S2: [count]
- Trends flagged: [count]
- Triage report: [path]
- Next sprint impact: [N bugs added]Quality Gates / PASS-FAIL
- PASS — every Open bug has a current severity, priority, and either a sprint assignment or a backlog flag with a revisit date. No S1 is unassigned.
- FAIL — any S1 bug remains unassigned, or any bug older than 30 days has not been re-evaluated.
Examples
Example 1 — sprint-04 kickoff: Reads 22 open bugs. Closes 4 (3 not-reproducible, 1 duplicate). Promotes 2 to S2 due to telemetry spike. Detects an "Android keyboard insets" cluster (4 bugs) and recommends ADR to standardize. Assigns 9 bugs to sprint-04.
Example 2 — backlog cleanup:
--since=2025-12-01 triages 38 stale entries. Closes 11 as
WontFix-due-to-rewrite, archives the rest with revisit dates.
Next Steps
- Systemic trend ->
/architecture-decisionor refactor story. - High-severity remaining ->
/hotfix [bug]. - Sprint-assigned bugs -> include in
/sprint-plan.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

