create-architecture
Skill40 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Section-by-section authoring of the master architecture doc for the app. Reads all PRDs, systems index, existing ADRs, and the framework reference docs to produce a complete blueprint and a Required ADR list. Framework-version-aware: flags knowledge gaps and validates against the pinned framework. Run after /review-all-prds passes.
12 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiostheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- fnayou/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studiostheir own version, first seen Oct 19, 2026
- venus2099/codex-game-studiostheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- ShiningPlague/shiningplague-studiotheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 5, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use art-bible.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MRCalderon3DSkillart-bible
Define a visual direction that artists, UI, technical art, and marketing can execute consistently.
Also in 10 projects that use this
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 12
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 118same name
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 17same name
- lilangMax/ClaudeCodeGameStudios★ 8same name
- hongyuanc/codex-game-studios★ 5same name
- adolfoaranaes12/BMAD-ENHANCED★ 2same name
- ailess-lab/CCFG★ 2same name
- fnayou/dotfiles★ 2same name
- dawn840705/claude-code-studios★ 1same name
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Plugin★ 1same name
2 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository77 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- design/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- src/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- tests/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adoptSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- asset-auditSkill
- asset-specSkill
- balance-checkSkill
- brainstormSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- bug-triageSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- consistency-checkSkill
- content-auditSkill
- create-control-manifestSkill
- create-epicsSkill
- create-storiesSkill
- day-one-patchSkill
- design-bibleSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- dev-storySkill
- estimateSkill
- extractSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- helpSkill
- hotfixSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- localizeSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- onboardSkill
- patch-notesSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- prd-reviewSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- propagate-design-changeSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qa-planSkill
- quick-designSkill
- regression-suiteSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- review-all-prdsSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- security-auditSkill
- setup-frameworkSkill
- skill-improveSkill
- skill-testSkill
- smoke-checkSkill
- soak-testSkill
- sprint-planSkill
- sprint-statusSkill
- startSkill
- story-doneSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
All MVP PRDs are individually approved and /review-all-prds returned PASS
- Very specific: line 47
If /review-all-prds has not been run or returned PASS, warn: "Architecture without holistic PRD review can codify contradictions.
- Very specific: line 49
If docs/architecture/architecture.md exists, ask:
- Distinctive: line 278
Default values shipped in the bundle
- Very specific: line 393
Update production/session-state/active.md with the architecture status and the next P0 ADR to write.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create Architecture
Produces the project's master architecture document — the technical blueprint that ADRs slot into. Without this, ADRs are scattered points without a structure.
Output: docs/architecture/architecture.md
Purpose / When to Run
Run when:
- All MVP PRDs are individually approved and
/review-all-prdsreturned PASS - The team is ready to commit to top-level structure before writing ADRs
Distinct from /architecture-decision (single decision) — this skill creates the frame that decisions hang on, plus the list of which ADRs are required.
Inputs
- All
design/prd/*.md design/systems-index.mddesign/concept.md- Existing
docs/architecture/ADR-*.md(if any — typically retrofit) docs/framework-reference/<framework>/.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md
Outputs
docs/architecture/architecture.md- A "Required ADRs" list inside that doc
- Optional initial
docs/architecture/architecture-registry.yamlskeleton
Phase 1: Pre-checks
- Confirm framework is pinned (
technical-preferences.mdnot[TO BE CONFIGURED]) - Confirm at least 80% of MVP PRDs are APPROVED in
design/systems-index.md - If
/review-all-prdshas not been run or returned PASS, warn: "Architecture without holistic PRD review can codify contradictions. Consider running/review-all-prdsfirst." Allow proceed anyway.
If docs/architecture/architecture.md exists, ask:
Refresh sections (incremental)— re-author specific sectionsRebuild from scratch (back up first)— full new draftCancel
Phase 2: Read All Context
This skill is read-heavy. Hold in context:
- All PRDs
- Concept doc
- Systems index
- Existing ADRs (to integrate, not duplicate)
- Framework reference: VERSION.md, conventions.md, breaking-changes.md
- Technical preferences
Note knowledge-cutoff risk for the pinned framework — if HIGH, flag in the doc header that decisions in tricky domains must consult breaking-changes.md.
Phase 3: Skeleton
Write docs/architecture/architecture.md:
# Architecture — <App Name>
> **Status**: In Design
> **Last Updated**: <date>
> **Framework**: <name + version>
> **Knowledge Risk**: <LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH>
## 1. Goals & Constraints
[To be designed]
## 2. Top-level Structure
[To be designed]
## 3. Layers
[To be designed]
## 4. Cross-cutting Concerns
[To be designed]
## 5. Data Flow
[To be designed]
## 6. State Management
[To be designed]
## 7. Navigation
[To be designed]
## 8. Networking & API
[To be designed]
## 9. Persistence
[To be designed]
## 10. Auth & Identity
[To be designed]
## 11. Push & Background
[To be designed]
## 12. Analytics & Instrumentation
[To be designed]
## 13. Feature Flags & Remote Config
[To be designed]
## 14. Error Handling & Reporting
[To be designed]
## 15. Theming, Dark Mode, i18n
[To be designed]
## 16. Build, Release, CI
[To be designed]
## 17. Testing Strategy
[To be designed]
## 18. Performance Budgets
[To be designed]
## 19. Privacy & Security
[To be designed]
## 20. Required ADRs
[To be designed — generated last]Ask before write.
Phase 4: Section Authoring (cycle each)
For each section, do:
Context (summarize relevant PRDs) → Question(s) → Options → Decision → Draft → Approval → WriteSection 1: Goals & Constraints
From concept doc + PRDs, list:
- Primary goal (the JTBD)
- Quality goals (perf, accessibility, reliability)
- Hard constraints (min OS, regulatory, store policies)
- Resource constraints (team size, timeline)
Section 2: Top-level Structure
A high-level diagram of the app's modules:
App
├─ Core (auth, persistence, networking)
├─ Features (each major user-facing system)
├─ Shared (UI components, utilities, design tokens)
└─ Platform (iOS-specific, Android-specific, native modules)Concrete folder paths per the framework's conventions.
Section 3: Layers
Common layering:
- Presentation (screens, components)
- State / view model
- Domain / use case (optional — depends on team complexity)
- Data (services, repositories)
- Infrastructure (cross-cutting)
For each layer, declare what it knows and does not know:
- Presentation knows nothing about persistence
- State knows nothing about UI rendering
- Data knows nothing about state shape
These rules become forbidden patterns in /create-control-manifest.
Section 4: Cross-cutting Concerns
For each: which library/pattern, where it is wired, who uses it.
- Authentication
- Logging
- Error reporting (Sentry / Crashlytics)
- Analytics
- Feature flags
- Theming
- i18n
- Permissions
- Deep links
- Push notifications
Each becomes a candidate ADR.
Section 5: Data Flow
Describe the dominant flow direction:
UI → ViewModel/Store → UseCase/Service → API/Persistence
↑ │
└────────── State / Result ─────────┘Note exceptions and document them.
Section 6: State Management
Reference the chosen library (or candidate options). Will become an ADR if not yet decided.
For framework-pinned tendencies:
- RN: Zustand / Redux / Jotai / MobX — recommend based on app complexity
- Flutter: Riverpod / BLoC / Provider
- iOS: TCA / ObservableObject + Combine / Redux-style
- Android: ViewModel + StateFlow / MVI
Section 7: Navigation
- Library
- Top-level structure (tabs / stack / drawer / mixed)
- Auth gating (where the redirect happens)
- Deep link strategy (universal links / app links / scheme)
Section 8: Networking & API
- Client library
- Auth (header injection, refresh)
- Error model (Result / sealed class / thrown)
- Retry / timeout defaults
- Offline strategy
Section 9: Persistence
- Local DB (SQLite / Hive / Realm / SwiftData / Room)
- Cache layer (HTTP cache / custom)
- Secure storage (Keychain / EncryptedSharedPreferences / KeyStore)
- Migration strategy
Section 10: Auth & Identity
- Provider (custom / Auth0 / Firebase / Apple Sign In / Google Sign In / OIDC)
- Token storage and rotation
- Session expiry handling
- Multi-factor support
- Biometric unlock
Section 11: Push & Background
- Push provider (FCM / APNS direct / OneSignal / etc.)
- Token storage and rotation
- Permission timing
- Categories / channels
- Deep link from notification
- Background tasks: which framework API (BGTaskScheduler / WorkManager / RN background-fetch)
Section 12: Analytics & Instrumentation
- Provider (Amplitude / Mixpanel / Firebase / Segment)
- Event vocabulary policy (snake_case / camelCase, named conventions)
- User identification policy (opt-in for analytics if regulated)
- Naming registry — refer to a single source of truth (often
design/registry/entities.yaml)
Section 13: Feature Flags & Remote Config
- Provider (LaunchDarkly / ConfigCat / Firebase Remote Config / custom)
- Default values shipped in the bundle
- Sampling for A/B tests
- Kill-switch flags
Section 14: Error Handling & Reporting
- Crash reporting (Sentry / Crashlytics / Bugsnag)
- Error boundaries (RN)
- Recoverable vs. fatal classification
- User-facing error UX (toast / screen / inline)
Section 15: Theming, Dark Mode, i18n
- Token export pipeline (Style Dictionary / native)
- Dark-mode strategy (mirror tokens vs. defer)
- Locale loading (synchronous bundle vs. dynamic fetch)
- RTL support
Section 16: Build, Release, CI
- Build flavors / configurations (dev, staging, prod)
- Codepush / OTA strategy if RN
- CI: GitHub Actions / Bitrise / Xcode Cloud — pick one
- Code signing
- Store provisioning
Section 17: Testing Strategy
- Unit (test runner from technical-preferences)
- Component / widget tests
- Integration tests
- E2E (Detox / Maestro / EarlGrey / Espresso)
- Manual evidence (screenshots, walkthrough docs)
- CI gates
Section 18: Performance Budgets
Concrete numbers:
- Cold start time target (ms)
- TTI (time-to-interactive) per screen
- Frame rate (60fps default; 120fps for ProMotion / 90fps Android)
- App size budget
- Memory ceiling
- Network: bytes per session
Section 19: Privacy & Security
- Data minimization
- Encryption at rest
- TLS pinning (or explicit non-pinning rationale)
- Secret management
- App Tracking Transparency (iOS)
- Play Data Safety (Android)
- GDPR / CCPA stance
Section 20: Required ADRs
Generate from Sections 6-19. Each cross-cutting decision needs an ADR. Output as a numbered list:
| Required ADR | Domain | Status | Priority |
|--------------|--------|--------|----------|
| state-management | State | Not yet written | P0 |
| navigation-library | Navigation | Not yet written | P0 |
| auth-token-storage | Auth | Not yet written | P0 |
| push-provider | Push | Not yet written | P1 |
| analytics-vocabulary | Analytics | Not yet written | P0 |
| feature-flag-provider | Feature flags | Not yet written | P1 |
| error-reporting | Error | Not yet written | P0 |
| testing-strategy | Testing | Not yet written | P0 |
| performance-budgets | Performance | Not yet written | P1 |
| ... | | | |P0 ADRs gate stories — engineering work cannot proceed safely without them. P1 can be written during sprint zero.
Phase 5: Specialist Synthesis
Spawn Task to:
mobile-architect— read the doc and flag inconsistencies, missing layers, or contradictions with PRDs- Framework specialist — validate Sections 6-11, 16 are idiomatic for the pinned version
Integrate findings.
Phase 6: Initialize Architecture Registry
Optionally write docs/architecture/architecture-registry.yaml skeleton:
version: 1
state_ownership: []
interfaces: []
forbidden_patterns: []
performance_budgets: []
api_decisions: []Ask before writing.
Phase 7: Hand Off
Print:
"Architecture written. Required ADR list has
<N>entries. Run/architecture-decision <slug>for each P0 entry next. Run/architecture-review(in fresh session) once all P0 ADRs are written."
Use AskUserQuestion:
Write the first P0 ADR nowRun /architecture-review (after ADRs)— disabled if no P0 ADR is yet AcceptedStop here
Update production/session-state/active.md with the architecture status and the next P0 ADR to write.
Quality Gates
- All 20 sections non-empty
- Required ADRs section lists at least the P0 set
- Performance budgets are numeric (no "fast", "small")
- Privacy section names specific stances (not "TBD")
- Cross-cutting concerns each have a named library or "deferred to ADR"
- Knowledge-risk warning is shown if framework risk is HIGH
Examples
A typical mobile MVP arch doc has ~20 sections, 8-12 P0 ADRs identified, and ~5-7 P1 ADRs. The Required ADR list includes state mgmt, nav, auth, push, analytics, error, testing, performance budgets at minimum.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

