agentleFS
brainbytes-devbrainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance/skills/vc-pe/portfolio-management-pe/SKILL.md

portfolio-management-pe

Skill9 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

PE/VC portfolio management — value creation, monitoring, exits. The first 100 days post-acquisition set the trajectory for value creation. The plan should be developed during due diligence and executed immediately upon close: Weeks 1-4: Stabilize and assess - Management alignment: confirm or replace key roles. Communicate ownership change to employees, customers, suppliers - Quick financial diagnostic: validate working capital, cash position, near-term commitments versus diligence assumptions - Customer and supplier risk assessment: identify concentration risks, at-risk relationships, contract renewals -…

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Carve-out readiness: If the business is a carve-out, ensure standalone capability (transitional services agreements, separated systems)

    line 104
  2. Distinctive:

    Run a competitive auction process to maximize price

    line 118
  3. Distinctive:

    Not a true exit but returns capital to investors.

    line 126
  4. Distinctive:

    Net IRR: After management fees (typically 2% of committed capital) and carry (typically 20% above a hurdle rate, usually 8%)

    line 134
  5. Distinctive:

    Annual planning: Update the 3-5 year business plan.

    line 146

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

portfolio-management-pe

PE/VC portfolio management — value creation, monitoring, exits.

When to Activate

  • Developing a post-acquisition value creation plan (100-day plan)
  • Identifying and prioritizing operational improvement levers
  • Structuring board governance and reporting for portfolio companies
  • Evaluating add-on acquisition opportunities for a platform investment
  • Assessing management team performance and considering changes
  • Preparing a portfolio company for exit (vendor due diligence, exit readiness)
  • Tracking fund-level performance metrics (IRR, MOIC, DPI, RVPI)
  • Selecting the optimal exit route (IPO, trade sale, secondary, recapitalization)

Core Concepts

100-Day Plan

The first 100 days post-acquisition set the trajectory for value creation. The plan should be developed during due diligence and executed immediately upon close:

Weeks 1-4: Stabilize and assess

  • Management alignment: confirm or replace key roles. Communicate ownership change to employees, customers, suppliers
  • Quick financial diagnostic: validate working capital, cash position, near-term commitments versus diligence assumptions
  • Customer and supplier risk assessment: identify concentration risks, at-risk relationships, contract renewals
  • IT and systems review: assess reliability of financial reporting, ERP, CRM

Weeks 5-8: Plan and prioritize

  • Finalize the value creation roadmap with specific initiatives, owners, timelines, and KPIs
  • Prioritize quick wins: pricing adjustments, cost reductions, working capital improvements achievable in 3-6 months
  • Establish the management reporting cadence: monthly board packs, quarterly deep dives, weekly KPI dashboards
  • Launch strategic projects: commercial excellence programs, procurement optimization, organizational restructuring

Weeks 9-12: Execute and embed

  • Track progress against the plan; adjust timelines and resources where needed
  • Embed new governance: board meetings, committee structure, management incentive alignment
  • Initiate longer-term projects: technology transformation, geographic expansion, product development
  • First board meeting with full portfolio company reporting

Value Creation Levers

Revenue growth:

  • Pricing optimization: cost-plus to value-based pricing, annual escalators, reduced discounting
  • Cross-selling and upselling: leverage customer relationships for adjacent products
  • Geographic expansion: new markets, channels, customer segments
  • New product development: extend the product line to capture more wallet share
  • Sales force effectiveness: CRM implementation, territory optimization, incentive alignment

Margin improvement:

  • Procurement: centralize purchasing, renegotiate supplier contracts, competitive bidding
  • Operational efficiency: lean manufacturing, automation, process reengineering
  • Overhead reduction: headcount rationalization, facility consolidation, shared services
  • Outsourcing: non-core functions to lower-cost providers
  • Mix improvement: shift revenue toward higher-margin products or services

Working capital optimization:

  • Receivables: shorten payment terms, improve collections, invoice factoring
  • Payables: extend supplier terms (without damaging relationships), dynamic discounting
  • Inventory: demand planning improvements, SKU rationalization, just-in-time practices
  • Cash conversion cycle: target reduction of 5-15 days across the cycle

Capex efficiency:

  • Distinguish maintenance capex from growth capex — scrutinize maintenance for deferral or elimination
  • Lease vs. buy analysis for major assets
  • Capital allocation framework: hurdle rates for investments, IRR-based prioritization
  • Asset disposals: sell non-core or underperforming assets

Board Management

The PE-backed board serves as a strategic governance body, not just a compliance function:

  • Composition: Typically 4-6 members — 1-2 PE deal team, CEO, CFO (or operating partner), 1-2 independent directors with industry expertise
  • Cadence: Monthly or bi-monthly board meetings, with quarterly strategy sessions
  • Board pack: Financial performance vs. budget and prior year, KPI dashboard, value creation initiative tracker, cash flow and liquidity, pipeline/backlog, risk register
  • Decision rights: Define clearly what requires board approval (capex above threshold, hiring above level, contracts above value, M&A, financing)
  • Operating partner involvement: PE firms increasingly deploy operating partners or functional experts to work alongside management between board meetings

Add-On Acquisitions

Buy-and-build strategies create value through multiple arbitrage and scale benefits:

  • Thesis: Acquire smaller companies at lower multiples (4-6x) onto a platform valued at higher multiples (8-12x) — creating immediate value from the multiple differential
  • Integration: Plan integration before signing. Priorities: finance and reporting systems, sales force alignment, procurement consolidation, brand architecture
  • Synergies: Revenue synergies (cross-selling, geographic extension) and cost synergies (shared back-office, procurement, facility consolidation). Target 5-15% of add-on revenue in cost synergies
  • Financing: Fund add-ons from a combination of existing cash flow, incremental debt (within covenant capacity), and tuck-in acquisition facilities
  • Pipeline management: Maintain a rolling pipeline of 10-20 potential targets. Score by strategic fit, valuation, integration complexity, and availability

Management Changes

  • Assessment framework: Evaluate management against the value creation plan. Can they deliver the required step-change, not just maintain the status quo?
  • Typical changes: CFO replacement is the most common PE-backed change (40-60% of deals). CEO replacement in 30-40% of deals, often after 12-18 months
  • Hiring approach: PE firms maintain networks of proven executives. Interim management can bridge gaps during recruitment
  • Incentive alignment: Management equity plan (typically 10-20% of equity pool) with vesting tied to time and performance (IRR or MOIC hurdles). Ratchet mechanisms accelerate vesting at higher returns

Exit Readiness Assessment

Preparation should begin 12-24 months before the target exit date:

  • Financial track record: At least 3 years of audited financials, preferably showing consistent growth and margin expansion
  • Quality of earnings: Commission a sell-side QoE report. Normalize for one-time items, add-backs, and pro forma adjustments
  • Vendor due diligence: Prepare VDD reports (financial, commercial, legal, tax, IT) — reduces buyer due diligence timeline and signals confidence
  • Management presentation: Prepare the equity story — investment thesis, market position, growth drivers, financial projections
  • Operational housekeeping: Resolve pending litigation, formalize key contracts, secure IP registrations, clean up corporate structure
  • Carve-out readiness: If the business is a carve-out, ensure standalone capability (transitional services agreements, separated systems)

Exit Routes

IPO:

  • Best for large, high-growth businesses with a compelling equity story
  • Requires 2-3 years of audited financials, strong management team, investor relations capability
  • PE sponsor typically retains a significant stake post-IPO with a lock-up period (90-180 days)
  • Highest potential valuation but longest process and ongoing public company obligations

Trade sale (strategic buyer):

  • Most common PE exit route (60-70% of exits)
  • Strategic premium for synergies, market access, or technology
  • Cleaner exit — full cash at close (or structured consideration)
  • Run a competitive auction process to maximize price

Secondary sale (financial buyer):

  • Sale to another PE fund. Common for platform companies that can continue to grow
  • Requires a credible equity story for the next buyer — remaining value creation potential
  • Continuation funds allow the same GP to retain the asset in a new vehicle

Recapitalization (dividend recap):

  • Not a true exit but returns capital to investors. New debt is raised to fund a special dividend
  • Reduces the equity at risk and improves IRR (earlier cash return)
  • Typically returns 0.5-1.5x of invested equity while retaining the portfolio company
  • Risk: increases leverage and constrains future flexibility

IRR / MOIC Tracking

  • Gross IRR: Time-weighted annualized return before management fees and carried interest
  • Net IRR: After management fees (typically 2% of committed capital) and carry (typically 20% above a hurdle rate, usually 8%)
  • MOIC (Multiple on Invested Capital): Total value (distributions + remaining value) / invested capital. Does not account for timing
  • DPI (Distribution to Paid-In): Realized returns. Cash returned / capital invested. The only metric that cannot be inflated by unrealized markups
  • RVPI (Residual Value to Paid-In): Unrealized value / capital invested. Subject to valuation judgment
  • TVPI (Total Value to Paid-In): DPI + RVPI. The total return multiple

Methodology

  1. Investment thesis review: Revisit the original investment thesis. What were the key value creation hypotheses? Are they still valid?
  2. 100-day plan execution: Track each initiative against timeline and impact. Escalate delays immediately
  3. Monthly monitoring: Review financial performance vs. budget, KPI trends, cash flow, and covenant compliance. Prepare board materials
  4. Quarterly strategy review: Assess progress on strategic initiatives, market developments, competitive landscape, and M&A pipeline
  5. Annual planning: Update the 3-5 year business plan. Recalibrate value creation targets based on actuals
  6. Exit preparation: Begin 18-24 months ahead. Commission vendor due diligence, prepare management presentation, engage advisors
  7. Exit execution: Select the optimal route, run the process (auction or bilateral), negotiate terms, execute

Templates

Value Creation Tracker

Initiative              | Owner  | Target Impact | Status    | Actual   | Timeline
                        |        | (EBITDA, $M)  |           | ($M YTD) |
------------------------|--------|---------------|-----------|----------|----------
Pricing optimization    | VP Sales| +$3.0M       | On track  | +$1.8M   | Q1-Q4
Procurement savings     | CPO    | +$2.5M        | Ahead     | +$2.0M   | Q1-Q3
Headcount optimization  | CHRO   | +$1.5M        | Delayed   | +$0.5M   | Q2-Q4
Add-on #1 synergies     | CFO    | +$1.0M        | On track  | +$0.4M   | Q2-Q4
New product launch      | CTO    | +$2.0M        | At risk   | +$0.2M   | Q3 onwards
Working capital release  | CFO   | $4.0M (cash)  | On track  | $2.5M    | Q1-Q3

Total plan impact:       +$10.0M EBITDA, $4.0M cash
YTD achievement:         +$4.9M EBITDA (49%), $2.5M cash (63%)

Portfolio Dashboard (Fund Level)

Company     | Vintage | Invested | Current  | MOIC  | Gross | Net   | DPI  | Status
            |         | ($M)     | Value($M)|       | IRR   | IRR   |      |
------------|---------|----------|----------|-------|-------|-------|------|--------
Platform A  | 2021    | 85       | 255      | 3.0x  | 32%   | 25%   | 1.2x | Harvest
Platform B  | 2022    | 120      | 200      | 1.7x  | 22%   | 17%   | 0.0x | Growth
Platform C  | 2023    | 65       | 78       | 1.2x  | 15%   | 10%   | 0.0x | Build
Platform D  | 2023    | 50       | 45       | 0.9x  | (8%)  | (12%) | 0.0x | Watch
Platform E  | 2024    | 90       | 95       | 1.1x  | N/M   | N/M   | 0.0x | Build

Fund Total  |         | 410      | 673      | 1.6x  | 18%   | 14%   | 0.25x|

Exit Readiness Checklist

Category            | Item                                    | Status      | Owner  | Due
--------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------|--------|-------
Financial           | 3 years audited financials              | Complete    | CFO    | Done
Financial           | Quality of earnings (sell-side)         | In progress | CFO    | Q2
Financial           | Management accounts (monthly, timely)   | Complete    | CFO    | Done
Commercial          | Market study / commercial VDD           | Not started | CEO    | Q3
Legal                | IP registrations confirmed             | Complete    | GC     | Done
Legal                | Material contracts reviewed            | In progress | GC     | Q2
Tax                  | Tax structuring for exit               | In progress | CFO    | Q3
Management           | Equity story / management presentation | Not started | CEO    | Q3
Operational          | Standalone IT systems                  | Complete    | CTO    | Done
Governance           | Board minutes complete and organized   | In progress | GC     | Q2

Quality Gate

  • 100-day plan developed before deal close with specific initiatives, owners, and measurable targets
  • Value creation tracker maintained monthly with actual vs. plan comparison
  • Board reporting cadence established — monthly financial review, quarterly strategy review
  • Management team assessed against value creation requirements; gaps addressed
  • Add-on acquisition pipeline maintained with scoring criteria and integration readiness
  • Working capital monitored monthly — cash conversion cycle benchmarked against targets
  • Fund-level metrics (IRR, MOIC, DPI, RVPI) calculated quarterly with consistent valuation methodology
  • Exit readiness assessment initiated 18-24 months before target exit date
  • Vendor due diligence commissioned and material issues addressed before going to market
  • Exit route analysis completed comparing IPO, trade sale, secondary, and recapitalization
  • Covenant compliance tracked monthly with headroom analysis and downside sensitivity
  • ESG factors monitored and reported in line with LP expectations and regulatory requirements

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.