agentleFS
brainbytes-devbrainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance/skills/investment-banking/deal-structuring/SKILL.md

deal-structuring

Skill9 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

name: deal-structuring description: M&A deal structuring — stock vs cash, earn-outs, tax considerations All-cash deal: - Certainty of value for target shareholders - Acquirer bears all post-close risk - Requires cash on hand, debt financing, or both - Taxable event for target shareholders (capital gains) - No dilution to acquirer's existing shareholders (but increases leverage) All-stock deal: - Target shareholders share in combined company's upside/downside - Exchange ratio: fixed (set number of shares) or floating (fixed value) - Potential for…

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    No dilution to acquirer's existing shareholders (but increases leverage)

    line 23
  2. Distinctive:

    Before finalizing deal structure analysis, verify:

    line 225

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Deal Structuring

name: deal-structuring description: M&A deal structuring — stock vs cash, earn-outs, tax considerations

When to Activate

  • User needs to evaluate deal consideration types (cash, stock, mixed)
  • Performing accretion/dilution analysis on a proposed transaction
  • Structuring earn-outs, escrow, or contingent consideration
  • Analyzing tax implications of transaction structures
  • Evaluating deal protection mechanisms or merger agreement terms

Core Concepts

Deal Consideration Types

All-cash deal:

  • Certainty of value for target shareholders
  • Acquirer bears all post-close risk
  • Requires cash on hand, debt financing, or both
  • Taxable event for target shareholders (capital gains)
  • No dilution to acquirer's existing shareholders (but increases leverage)

All-stock deal:

  • Target shareholders share in combined company's upside/downside
  • Exchange ratio: fixed (set number of shares) or floating (fixed value)
  • Potential for tax-free reorganization (Section 368)
  • Dilutive to acquirer's existing shareholders
  • Subject to market risk between signing and closing

Mixed consideration (cash + stock):

  • Balances interests of both parties
  • May offer election mechanism (shareholder choice, subject to proration)
  • Partial tax deferral possible depending on structure

Other consideration elements:

  • CVRs (Contingent Value Rights) — tradeable instruments tied to milestones
  • Assumed debt — acquirer takes on target's existing obligations
  • Rollover equity — target management reinvests portion of proceeds (common in PE deals)

Accretion / Dilution Analysis

Determines whether a transaction is accretive (increases) or dilutive (decreases) to the acquirer's EPS.

Acquirer Standalone EPS:     $X.XX
Pro Forma Combined EPS:      $Y.YY
Accretion / (Dilution):      $(Y.YY - X.XX) = $Z.ZZ
Accretion / (Dilution) %:    Z.ZZ / X.XX = ___%

Pro forma EPS calculation:

Acquirer Net Income
+ Target Net Income
+ After-Tax Cost Synergies
- After-Tax Revenue Dis-synergies (if any)
- Incremental Interest Expense (on new debt, after tax)
+ Interest Income Foregone (on cash used, after tax) — negative
- Incremental D&A from Fair Value Step-Ups (after tax)
- Goodwill Amortization (if applicable under GAAP for private acquirers)
= Pro Forma Net Income

÷ Pro Forma Diluted Shares (acquirer shares + new shares issued)
= Pro Forma EPS

Key drivers of accretion/dilution:

  • Relative P/E ratios: acquirer P/E > target P/E tends to be accretive (stock deal)
  • Synergy magnitude and timing
  • Cost of financing (interest rate on debt) vs target's earnings yield
  • Purchase price premium

Tax Structures

Taxable transactions:

  • Asset purchase (buyer perspective): step-up in tax basis of acquired assets, creating future tax deductions (amortizable goodwill under Section 197 — 15 years)
  • Stock purchase (no 338(h)(10) election): no asset step-up, carry-over tax basis
  • Cash tender offer: generally taxable to target shareholders

Tax-free reorganizations (Section 368):

  • Type A: Statutory merger — most flexible, allows up to 60% cash
  • Type B: Stock-for-stock — must be 100% stock consideration
  • Type C: Asset acquisition — substantially all assets for stock
  • Requirements: continuity of interest, continuity of business enterprise, valid business purpose
  • Benefit: target shareholders defer capital gains tax

Section 338(h)(10) election:

  • Stock purchase treated as asset purchase for tax purposes
  • Buyer gets asset step-up (tax shield via amortization)
  • Seller treated as if assets were sold (may result in double tax for C-corps)
  • Most beneficial for S-corps, partnerships, or subsidiaries

Earn-Out Structures

Earn-outs bridge valuation gaps by making a portion of consideration contingent on future performance.

Design parameters:

Metric:          Revenue, EBITDA, gross profit, or specific milestones
Period:          1-3 years (longer periods create more friction)
Measurement:     Annual vs cumulative
Cap:             Maximum earn-out payable
Floor:           Minimum performance threshold before any payout
Acceleration:    Change of control triggers full payout
Dispute resolution: Independent accountant for financial metrics

Common structures:

  • Linear: pro-rata payout between floor and cap
  • Tiered: step-function payouts at defined thresholds
  • Binary: all-or-nothing at a single milestone
  • Hybrid: combination of financial and non-financial milestones

Risks and mitigation:

  • Buyer manipulation: seller demands operational covenants (maintain sales force, R&D spending)
  • Integration conflicts: earn-out period operations may conflict with integration plans
  • Accounting: ASC 805 requires fair value estimation of contingent consideration at close

Escrow and Indemnification

Escrow Amount:        Typically 5-15% of purchase price
Escrow Period:        12-24 months (longer for specific indemnities like tax)
Release:              Scheduled release or at expiry, less claims
R&W Insurance:        Increasingly common alternative to large escrow
Indemnification Cap:  Often 10-20% of purchase price (excluding fundamental reps)
Basket/Deductible:    0.5-1.0% of purchase price (tipping vs true deductible)

Deal Protection Mechanisms

Seller-favorable protections:

  • Go-shop period: 30-60 days post-signing to solicit competing bids
  • Fiduciary out: board can terminate if superior proposal received
  • Reverse break-up fee: acquirer pays if it fails to close (financing failure, regulatory block) — typically 3-6% of EV

Buyer-favorable protections:

  • No-shop clause: target cannot solicit or engage with other bidders
  • Break-up fee: target pays if it terminates to accept a superior offer — typically 2-4% of EV
  • Matching rights: acquirer has right to match any superior proposal
  • Force-the-vote: target must submit deal to shareholder vote even if board changes recommendation
  • Lockup option: acquirer gets option to buy shares or assets at favorable price if deal breaks

Material Adverse Change (MAC)

MAC clause allows the acquirer to terminate if the target experiences a material adverse change between signing and closing.

Typically carved out (not considered MAC):

  • General economic or market conditions
  • Industry-wide changes
  • Changes in law or accounting standards
  • Effects of the announced transaction itself
  • Natural disasters, pandemics (increasingly carved out post-2020)

MAC litigation is rare but high-stakes — courts apply a high bar (durationally significant impact on long-term earnings power).

Methodology

Deal Structure Decision Framework

  1. Assess acquirer's capacity — cash on hand, debt capacity, share price/currency strength
  2. Evaluate tax implications — taxable vs tax-free for both buyer and seller
  3. Model accretion/dilution — under cash, stock, and mixed scenarios
  4. Consider seller preferences — tax deferral, continued upside participation, certainty
  5. Address valuation gaps — earn-outs, CVRs if buyer and seller disagree on value
  6. Structure protections — escrow, indemnification, MAC clause, deal protection
  7. Negotiate governance — board seats, management retention, integration approach

Templates

Accretion / Dilution Summary

=== ACCRETION / DILUTION ANALYSIS ===

Transaction: [Acquirer] acquiring [Target]
Consideration: [Cash / Stock / Mixed]
Purchase Price: $____m (___x EV/EBITDA)

--- Pro Forma EPS Impact ---
                               | 100% Cash | 100% Stock | 50/50 Mix
Acquirer Standalone EPS        |   $____   |    $____   |   $____
Target Net Income              |   $____m  |    $____m  |   $____m
+ Cost Synergies (after-tax)   |   $____m  |    $____m  |   $____m
- Incremental Interest (a-t)   |  ($____m) |      —     |  ($____m)
- D&A Step-Up (after-tax)      |  ($____m) |   ($____m) |  ($____m)
Pro Forma Net Income           |   $____m  |    $____m  |   $____m
Pro Forma Shares               |   ____m   |    ____m   |   ____m
Pro Forma EPS                  |   $____   |    $____   |   $____
Accretion / (Dilution)         |   ____%   |    ____%   |   ____%

Break-even Synergies:          $____m pre-tax

Earn-Out Term Sheet

=== EARN-OUT STRUCTURE ===

Metric:              [EBITDA / Revenue / Milestone]
Measurement Period:  Year 1: [Date] to [Date]
                     Year 2: [Date] to [Date]
Threshold (Floor):   $____m [Metric]
Target:              $____m [Metric]
Maximum (Cap):       $____m [Metric]

Payout Schedule:
- Below Floor:       $0
- At Threshold:      $____m
- At Target:         $____m
- At/Above Cap:      $____m (maximum)
- Linear interpolation between thresholds

Payment Form:        [Cash / Stock / Election]
Payment Timing:      Within 90 days of measurement period end
Dispute Resolution:  [Independent accounting firm]
Acceleration:        [Full payout on change of control]

Quality Gate

Before finalizing deal structure analysis, verify:

  • Accretion/dilution analysis covers all consideration scenarios (cash, stock, mixed)
  • Tax structure is appropriate for both buyer and seller objectives
  • Earn-out metrics are clearly measurable and not easily manipulated
  • Escrow amount and period are within market norms for deal size
  • Deal protection mechanisms are balanced and market-standard
  • MAC clause carve-outs reflect current market practice
  • Pro forma share count includes dilutive impact of new shares issued
  • Synergy assumptions are phased realistically (not 100% in year 1)
  • Interest rate assumptions on acquisition debt reflect current market
  • Regulatory approval timeline is factored into the deal timeline
  • Break-up fee and reverse break-up fee are within customary range (2-4%, 3-6%)
  • Indemnification structure balances risk allocation between buyer and seller
  • Accounting treatment (ASC 805/IFRS 3) for consideration is correctly modeled

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.