agentleFS
brainbytes-devbrainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance/skills/insurance/solvency-ii/SKILL.md

solvency-ii

Skill9 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

name: solvency-ii description: Solvency II framework — three pillars, SCR, MCR, ORSA. Pillar 1 — Quantitative Requirements: - Valuation of assets and liabilities (market-consistent) - Technical provisions = Best Estimate Liabilities (BEL) + Risk Margin - Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) — target capital - Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) — absolute floor - Own funds classification and eligibility - Investment rules (prudent person principle) Pillar 2 — Qualitative Requirements (Governance): - System of governance (fit and proper, key functions) - Risk…

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Solvency II

name: solvency-ii description: Solvency II framework — three pillars, SCR, MCR, ORSA.

When to Activate

  • Calculating Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) and Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR)
  • Understanding the three-pillar structure of Solvency II
  • Performing or reviewing an Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
  • Classifying and valuing insurance liabilities (best estimate + risk margin)
  • Assessing eligible own funds and tiering (Tier 1, 2, 3)
  • Evaluating risk modules under the standard formula
  • Comparing standard formula vs internal model approaches
  • Analyzing group solvency and intra-group transactions
  • Regulatory reporting (QRTs — Quantitative Reporting Templates)
  • Solvency and Financial Condition Report (SFCR) preparation

Core Concepts

Three-Pillar Structure

Pillar 1 — Quantitative Requirements:

  • Valuation of assets and liabilities (market-consistent)
  • Technical provisions = Best Estimate Liabilities (BEL) + Risk Margin
  • Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) — target capital
  • Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) — absolute floor
  • Own funds classification and eligibility
  • Investment rules (prudent person principle)

Pillar 2 — Qualitative Requirements (Governance):

  • System of governance (fit and proper, key functions)
  • Risk management system and policies
  • Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
  • Internal control system
  • Actuarial function requirements
  • Outsourcing governance
  • Supervisory review process

Pillar 3 — Reporting and Disclosure:

  • Solvency and Financial Condition Report (SFCR) — public
  • Regular Supervisory Report (RSR) — to supervisor
  • Quantitative Reporting Templates (QRTs) — structured data
  • Annual and quarterly reporting cycles
  • Group reporting requirements

Technical Provisions

Technical Provisions = Best Estimate Liabilities (BEL) + Risk Margin

Best Estimate Liabilities:
  = Probability-weighted average of future cash flows
  = PV of expected future claim payments + expenses - future premiums
  Discounted at risk-free rate (EIOPA publishes term structures)

  Adjustments to risk-free rate:
  - Volatility Adjustment (VA): Correction for credit spread volatility
  - Matching Adjustment (MA): For portfolios of illiquid liabilities matched with assets
  - Transitional measures: Phased introduction for legacy portfolios

Risk Margin:
  = Cost of capital required to run off the insurance liabilities
  = Cost-of-Capital rate (6%) x PV of future SCR over run-off period
  Represents the amount a third party would require above BEL to take over the liabilities

Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR)

Standard Formula — modular structure:

SCR = BSCR + Adj + SCR_op

BSCR (Basic SCR) — aggregated using correlation matrices:

                    Market   Default   Life    Health   Non-Life
  Market risk        1.00
  Counterparty def.  0.25     1.00
  Life underwriting  0.25     0.25     1.00
  Health UW          0.25     0.25     0.25    1.00
  Non-life UW        0.25     0.50     0.00    0.00     1.00

BSCR = sqrt(Sum_ij Corr_ij x SCR_i x SCR_j) + SCR_intangibles

Adj = Adjustment for loss-absorbing capacity of technical provisions and deferred taxes
SCR_op = Operational risk capital charge

SCR risk modules:

ModuleSub-modulesKey Risk
Market riskInterest rate, equity, property, spread, concentration, currencyAsset value changes
Counterparty defaultType 1 (reinsurance, derivatives), Type 2 (receivables)Counterparty failure
Life underwritingMortality, longevity, disability, lapse, expense, revision, catastropheInsurance risk (life)
Health underwritingSLT health, non-SLT health, catastropheInsurance risk (health)
Non-life underwritingPremium & reserve, lapse, catastrophe (natural, man-made)Insurance risk (non-life)
Operational riskBased on premiums and technical provisionsOperational failures

SCR calculation method:

Each sub-module applies a prescribed stress:
  - Equity risk: 39% + symmetric adjustment (type 1) or 49% (type 2) instantaneous fall
  - Interest rate risk: Prescribed up/down shifts to yield curve
  - Spread risk: Instantaneous widening based on rating and duration
  - Property risk: 25% instantaneous fall
  - Longevity risk: 20% permanent decrease in mortality rates
  - Lapse risk: Max of mass lapse (40%), permanent increase (50%), permanent decrease (50%)
  - Non-life CAT: Scenario-based (natural catastrophe models by peril and region)

SCR for each module = Change in net asset value (own funds) under the stress

Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR)

MCR = Max(MCR_linear, 25% x SCR)
MCR = Min(MCR, 45% x SCR)
MCR = Max(MCR, Absolute Floor)

Absolute floors:
  Life:              EUR 3.7M
  Non-life:          EUR 2.5M
  Composite:         EUR 3.7M
  Reinsurance:       EUR 3.6M

MCR_linear: Based on technical provisions and premiums written
  (simpler calculation than SCR — provides an absolute minimum)

Breaching MCR triggers ultimate supervisory intervention (license withdrawal)
Breaching SCR triggers recovery plan and supervisory escalation

Own Funds

Classification into tiers based on quality:

TierCharacteristicsExamplesSCR Coverage LimitMCR Coverage Limit
Tier 1 (unrestricted)Permanent, fully loss-absorbing, subordinatedPaid-up ordinary share capital, retained earnings, reconciliation reserveUnlimitedUnlimited (min 80% of MCR)
Tier 1 (restricted)Permanent, loss-absorbing, call after 5+ yearsPerpetual subordinated instrumentsMax 20% of Tier 1Max 20% of Tier 1
Tier 2Subordinated, minimum 10-year maturityDated subordinated debt, unpaid called-up capitalMax 50% of SCRMax 20% of MCR
Tier 3Subordinated, minimum 5-year maturityShort-dated subordinated debt, net DTAMax 15% of SCRNot eligible

Solvency ratio:

Solvency Ratio = Eligible Own Funds / SCR x 100%

Target: > 100% (absolute minimum)
Comfortable: > 150-180% (most insurers target this range)
Strong: > 200%

Below 100%: Recovery plan required, supervisor intensifies oversight
Below MCR:  Finance scheme required, ultimate intervention possible

ORSA (Own Risk and Solvency Assessment)

Purpose: Forward-looking self-assessment of the undertaking's overall solvency needs considering its specific risk profile, risk tolerance, and business strategy.

ORSA requirements:

  1. Overall solvency needs: Assessment of capital needs beyond the regulatory SCR, considering risks not fully captured by the standard formula
  2. Continuous compliance: Forward-looking projection of SCR and own funds over the business planning horizon (typically 3-5 years)
  3. Deviation from standard formula assumptions: Assessment of whether the standard formula SCR appropriately reflects the undertaking's risk profile

ORSA process:

1. Risk identification and assessment
   - Quantifiable risks (market, underwriting, credit, operational)
   - Non-quantifiable risks (strategic, reputational, regulatory)
   - Emerging risks

2. Stress testing and scenario analysis
   - Regulatory stress scenarios
   - Reverse stress tests (what breaks the business?)
   - Company-specific scenarios (key risk concentrations)

3. Capital projection
   - Base case: SCR and own funds over planning period
   - Adverse scenario: Impact on solvency ratio
   - Management actions: Planned responses to solvency deterioration

4. Board sign-off
   - ORSA report presented to and approved by the board
   - Integration with business strategy and capital planning
   - Documented decision-making process

Standard Formula vs Internal Model

FeatureStandard FormulaInternal Model
ComplexityPrescribed calculationsCompany-specific model
CalibrationRegulatory parametersOwn data and assumptions
Risk sensitivityModerateHigh (reflects actual risk profile)
ApprovalAutomaticRequires supervisory approval (pre-application, documentation, validation)
DiversificationPrescribed correlation matricesCompany-specific correlations
CostLowHigh (build, validation, ongoing maintenance)
Typical usersSmall-mid insurersLarge insurers, complex risk profiles

Methodology

  1. Valuation: Mark assets to market; calculate BEL and risk margin for technical provisions
  2. Own funds determination: Classify capital instruments into tiers; apply limits
  3. SCR calculation: Apply standard formula stresses or run internal model; aggregate using correlation matrix
  4. MCR calculation: Apply linear formula and corridor (25-45% of SCR)
  5. Solvency ratio: Eligible own funds / SCR; assess against target and trigger levels
  6. ORSA: Forward-looking solvency projection; stress testing; board reporting
  7. Reporting: Prepare QRTs, SFCR, and RSR per regulatory timelines

Templates

Solvency Position Summary

=== SOLVENCY II POSITION ===

                                        Amount (EUR M)
Own Funds:
  Tier 1 unrestricted                   __________
  Tier 1 restricted                     __________
  Tier 2                                __________
  Tier 3                                __________
  Total own funds                       __________
  Eligible own funds (after limits)     __________

SCR Components:
  Market risk                           __________
  Counterparty default risk             __________
  Life underwriting risk                __________
  Health underwriting risk              __________
  Non-life underwriting risk            __________
  Diversification benefit               (__________)
  BSCR                                  __________
  Operational risk                      __________
  Adj (loss-absorbing capacity)         (__________)
  SCR                                   __________

MCR                                     __________

Solvency Ratio (Own Funds / SCR):       ____%
MCR Coverage (Own Funds / MCR):         ____%

Status: [ ] Compliant  [ ] Recovery Plan  [ ] Finance Scheme

ORSA Solvency Projection

=== FORWARD-LOOKING SOLVENCY PROJECTION ===

                        Year 0      Year 1      Year 2      Year 3
                       (Actual)   (Projected) (Projected) (Projected)
Own funds              ________   ________    ________    ________
SCR                    ________   ________    ________    ________
Solvency ratio         ____%      ____%       ____%       ____%

Stress scenario (equity -30%, spread +100bp):
Own funds              ________   ________    ________    ________
SCR                    ________   ________    ________    ________
Solvency ratio         ____%      ____%       ____%       ____%

Management actions:
  Dividend restriction:   Trigger at ____% solvency ratio
  De-risking:             Trigger at ____% solvency ratio
  Capital raise:          Trigger at ____% solvency ratio

Quality Gate

  • Technical provisions calculated as BEL + risk margin using EIOPA risk-free rate curves
  • Volatility adjustment or matching adjustment applied only where criteria are met
  • Own funds classified into correct tiers with eligibility limits applied
  • SCR modules correctly stressed using prescribed calibrations
  • Diversification benefit calculated using regulatory correlation matrices
  • Loss-absorbing capacity of deferred taxes substantiated with recoverability analysis
  • MCR calculated within the 25-45% SCR corridor and above absolute floor
  • ORSA covers forward-looking solvency projection under base and stress scenarios
  • Standard formula appropriateness assessed (ORSA requirement)
  • QRTs completed per regulatory templates and timelines
  • SFCR prepared for public disclosure with required content sections
  • Group solvency calculations include all subsidiaries and eliminate intra-group transactions

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.