budgeting
Skill9 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
name: budgeting description: Annual and quarterly budgeting process and methodology Top-Down Budgeting: - Executive team sets high-level targets (revenue growth, margin targets, total opex envelope) - Targets are allocated to business units and cost centers - Pros: fast, aligned with strategic objectives, controls total spend - Cons: may lack operational realism, limited buy-in from managers - Best for: mature, stable businesses with centralized decision-making Bottom-Up Budgeting: - Individual departments build their budgets from granular assumptions - Budgets are aggregated and…
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mtzanidakis/budgetingtheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
- poorvith-mp/skills-financetheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- mtzanidakis/budgeting★ 1same name
- poorvith-mp/skills-finance★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- consolidationSkill
- deferred-taxesSkill
- gaap-standardsSkill
- hgb-standardsSkill
- ifrs-standardsSkill
- lease-accountingSkill
- revenue-recognitionSkill
- balanced-scorecardSkill
- deckungsbeitragsrechnungSkill
- investitionsrechnungSkill
- kostenrechnungSkill
- aml-kycSkill
- basel-iiiSkill
- mariskSkill
- sox-complianceSkill
- kpi-systemsSkill
- wertschoepfungskettenSkill
- covenant-analysisSkill
- credit-scoring-modelsSkill
- rating-methodologiesSkill
- econometricsSkill
- fiscal-policySkill
- labor-marketsSkill
- monetary-policy-analysisSkill
- trade-economicsSkill
- earnings-modelsSkill
- sector-analysisSkill
- cash-flow-forecastingSkill
- rolling-forecastsSkill
- scenario-planningSkill
- variance-analysisSkill
- solvency-iiSkill
- comparable-analysisSkill
- dcf-valuationSkill
- deal-structuringSkill
- lbo-modelingSkill
- pitch-book-creationSkill
- precedent-transactionsSkill
- corporate-tax-planningSkill
- international-taxSkill
- transfer-pricingSkill
- vat-optimizationSkill
- working-capitalSkill
- cap-table-analysisSkill
- lbo-modeling-detailSkill
- portfolio-management-peSkill
- startup-valuationSkill
- term-sheet-analysisSkill
- asset-allocationSkill
- estate-planningSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 39
Every expense must be justified from zero each period (no prior-year baseline)
- Distinctive: line 248
Before finalizing a budget, verify:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Budgeting
name: budgeting description: Annual and quarterly budgeting process and methodology
When to Activate
- User needs to build or improve an annual or quarterly budgeting process
- Designing budget templates for revenue, cost centers, or capex
- Establishing a budget calendar and approval workflow
- Choosing between budgeting approaches (top-down, bottom-up, zero-based)
- Aligning headcount planning with financial budgets
Core Concepts
Budgeting Approaches
Top-Down Budgeting:
- Executive team sets high-level targets (revenue growth, margin targets, total opex envelope)
- Targets are allocated to business units and cost centers
- Pros: fast, aligned with strategic objectives, controls total spend
- Cons: may lack operational realism, limited buy-in from managers
- Best for: mature, stable businesses with centralized decision-making
Bottom-Up Budgeting:
- Individual departments build their budgets from granular assumptions
- Budgets are aggregated and reconciled at the corporate level
- Pros: operationally realistic, strong ownership from budget holders
- Cons: slow, prone to "padding," requires extensive review cycles
- Best for: decentralized organizations, businesses with diverse operating units
Top-Down/Bottom-Up Hybrid (most common):
- Executive team provides strategic guardrails (growth targets, margin floors)
- Departments build within those constraints
- Iterative negotiation resolves gaps between top-down targets and bottom-up reality
- Typically 2-3 iteration cycles
Zero-Based Budgeting (ZBB):
- Every expense must be justified from zero each period (no prior-year baseline)
- Decision packages ranked by priority; funded until budget envelope is exhausted
- Pros: eliminates legacy spending, forces prioritization
- Cons: extremely time-intensive, can impair morale if applied too aggressively
- Best for: cost transformation programs, PE-owned companies, organizations with significant cost bloat
Budget Calendar
=== ANNUAL BUDGET CALENDAR (for January fiscal year-end) ===
Month | Activity
July | CFO issues budget guidelines, strategic priorities, macro assumptions
August | Revenue planning: sales teams build pipeline-based forecasts
| Headcount planning: HR and department heads draft hiring plans
September | Department managers submit initial bottom-up budgets
| FP&A consolidates, identifies gaps vs top-down targets
October | Iteration 1: feedback to departments, request revisions
| Capital committee reviews capex requests
November | Iteration 2: final departmental submissions
| FP&A produces consolidated P&L, balance sheet, cash flow
| Executive review sessions (by BU/function)
December | CFO/CEO finalize budget, present to Board for approval
| Board approval
January | Budget loaded into ERP/planning system
| Communication to organization
| Q1 operating against approved budgetRevenue Budgeting
By segment / product line:
Revenue = Volume × Price × Mix
For SaaS:
ARR_beginning
+ New ARR (new logo bookings × average contract value)
+ Expansion ARR (upsell, cross-sell, price increases)
- Churned ARR (gross churn)
- Contraction ARR (downgrades)
= ARR_ending
Revenue ≈ (ARR_beginning + ARR_ending) / 2 + Professional Services + OtherFor each revenue stream, define:
- Key driver (units, subscribers, seats, transactions, ASP)
- Growth assumptions with supporting evidence
- Seasonality pattern (allocate annual budget by month/quarter)
- Risk factors and upside scenarios
Cost Center Budgeting
Personnel costs (typically 60-80% of opex for knowledge businesses):
Personnel Cost = Headcount × Avg Compensation × (1 + Benefits Load Factor)
Build from:
- Current headcount (filled positions)
- Planned hires (timing, role level, location)
- Expected attrition and backfills
- Merit increases (typically 3-5% annually)
- Bonus pool (% of base salary, linked to performance targets)
- Benefits load factor (15-30% of base, varies by country)
- Payroll taxes
- Stock-based compensation (vesting schedules)Non-personnel operating expenses:
By category:
- Facilities (rent, utilities, maintenance) — typically fixed or contractual
- Technology (SaaS subscriptions, infrastructure, licenses) — semi-variable
- Professional services (consulting, legal, audit) — project-based
- Travel & entertainment — % of revenue or per-head
- Marketing (programs, events, digital) — % of revenue or campaign-based
- Depreciation & amortization — from capex scheduleCapex Budgeting
Maintenance capex: Required to sustain current operations (asset replacement, IT refresh) Growth capex: New capacity, new locations, product development
Capex Budget Line | Category | Amount | Timing | Useful Life | Approval
Server refresh | Maintenance | $___k | Q2 | 5 years | IT VP
New office buildout| Growth | $___k | Q1-Q2 | 10 years | CFO
Product tooling | Growth | $___k | Q3 | 7 years | COOHeadcount Planning
=== HEADCOUNT PLAN ===
Department | Current HC | Attrition | Backfills | New Hires | Year-End HC | FTE Avg
Engineering | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___
Sales | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___
Marketing | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___
G&A | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___
Total | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___ | ___
Average FTE = (BOY HC + EOY HC) / 2 (simplified)
or monthly FTE average for more precisionMethodology
Budget Build Process
- Set strategic context — CFO communicates targets, macro assumptions, strategic priorities
- Distribute templates — standardized templates to all budget holders
- Revenue build — sales/commercial teams build revenue by segment, product, geography
- Headcount plan — HR coordinates with department heads on hiring plan
- Opex build — cost center managers populate expense budgets
- Capex requests — capital expenditure proposals with business cases
- Consolidation — FP&A aggregates all inputs into consolidated financials
- Gap analysis — compare bottom-up total against top-down targets
- Iteration — negotiate adjustments, typically 2-3 cycles
- Executive review — CEO/CFO review by business unit and function
- Board approval — final budget presented to board
- Communication — approved budget distributed to organization
- System load — budget entered into ERP/planning tool for tracking
Common Macro Assumptions to Set Centrally
- FX rates (for multi-currency businesses)
- Inflation rate (feeds into cost escalation)
- Commodity prices (if relevant)
- Interest rates (for debt service budgeting)
- Tax rate (statutory, effective, cash tax rate)
- Merit increase pool percentage
- Benefits cost escalation rate
Templates
Budget Summary Template
=== ANNUAL BUDGET SUMMARY ===
Company: [Name]
Fiscal Year: [Year]
Currency: [CCY]
Prepared: [Date]
--- Consolidated P&L Budget ($ thousands) ---
| Prior Year | Budget | YoY Growth | % Revenue
| Actual | [Year] | |
Revenue | _____ | _____ | ___% | 100.0%
Cost of Revenue | (_____) | (_____) | ___% | ___%
Gross Profit | _____ | _____ | ___% | ___%
Operating Expenses:
Sales & Marketing | (_____) | (_____) | ___% | ___%
Research & Dev | (_____) | (_____) | ___% | ___%
General & Admin | (_____) | (_____) | ___% | ___%
Total Opex | (_____) | (_____) | ___% | ___%
EBITDA | _____ | _____ | ___% | ___%
D&A | (_____) | (_____) | |
EBIT | _____ | _____ | ___% | ___%
Interest Expense | (_____) | (_____) | |
EBT | _____ | _____ | |
Tax | (_____) | (_____) | |
Net Income | _____ | _____ | ___% | ___%
--- Key Metrics ---
Headcount (year-end): ____
Revenue per Employee: $____k
Capex: $____k
Free Cash Flow: $____kDepartment Budget Template
=== DEPARTMENT BUDGET ===
Department: [Name]
Budget Owner: [Name]
Cost Center: [Code]
--- Personnel Costs ---
Role / Level | Headcount | Avg Comp | Benefits | Total Cost | Start Month
Senior Engineer | ___ | $____k | $____k | $____k | ___
Junior Engineer | ___ | $____k | $____k | $____k | ___
Manager | ___ | $____k | $____k | $____k | ___
Subtotal | ___ | | | $____k |
--- Non-Personnel Costs ---
Category | Monthly | Annual | Notes
Software Licenses | $____ | $____ | [Vendor, contract term]
Consulting | $____ | $____ | [Project scope]
Travel | $____ | $____ | [Per-head assumption]
Other | $____ | $____ |
Subtotal | $____ | $____ |
--- Total Department Budget ---
Personnel: $____k
Non-Personnel: $____k
Total: $____k
vs Prior Year: ___% changeQuality Gate
Before finalizing a budget, verify:
- Revenue assumptions are driver-based and traceable to operational inputs
- Headcount plan ties to personnel cost budget (no orphaned headcount)
- Hiring timing is realistic (account for recruiting lead time, typically 2-4 months)
- Benefits load factor reflects current rates and expected cost increases
- Capex is categorized as maintenance vs growth with appropriate useful lives
- Budget consolidation balances (intercompany eliminations handled)
- Seasonality is reflected in monthly/quarterly phasing (not straight-line unless appropriate)
- Currency assumptions are documented and applied consistently
- Budget implies achievable improvement vs prior year (not aspirational fantasy)
- Cash flow implications are modeled (working capital, capex, debt service)
- Contingency reserve is included (typically 2-5% of opex)
- Board-approved budget matches what is loaded into the planning system
- Budget holders have signed off on their respective budgets
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

