transport-choice
Skill0 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Pick stdio or a network transport deliberately, based on where the server and its data actually live. Use when a new server is being designed and the transport decision is still open
In this repository49 other files it gives its agents.
- argument-construction-from-artifactsSkill
- audit-log-of-tool-callsSkill
- bounded-output-designSkill
- capability-negotiation-checkSkill
- changelog-and-versioningSkill
- concurrency-and-ordering-checkSkill
- context-window-managementSkill
- credential-isolationSkill
- data-retention-policySkill
- description-as-contractSkill
- destructive-action-confirmationSkill
- destructive-tool-gatingSkill
- deterministic-command-choicesSkill
- done-when-criteriaSkill
- error-shape-for-agentsSkill
- fixture-driven-transcript-testsSkill
- human-in-the-loop-escalationSkill
- idempotency-annotationSkill
- input-schema-strictnessSkill
- least-privilege-tool-grantsSkill
- lifecycle-test-initialize-then-toolsSkill
- local-vs-remote-boundarySkill
- one-procedure-per-skillSkill
- pagination-and-limit-disciplineSkill
- parallel-tool-call-safetySkill
- protocol-conformance-testSkill
- protocol-version-handshakeSkill
- publishing-a-pack-locallySkill
- rate-limit-respectSkill
- reference-canonicalisationSkill
- replay-transcript-for-regressionSkill
- restart-and-reload-semanticsSkill
- scope-guard-before-executionSkill
- search-then-fetch-patternSkill
- secrets-via-environmentSkill
- server-discovery-and-trustSkill
- signal-and-pitfall-sectionsSkill
- skill-frontmatter-contractSkill
- stdio-client-configSkill
- stdout-purity-checkSkill
- third-party-server-sandboxingSkill
- tool-call-budgetingSkill
- tool-call-error-pathsSkill
- tool-error-without-retry-stormSkill
- tools-list-schema-validationSkill
- tool-surface-minimisationSkill
- tool-verb-namingSkill
- verify-tool-output-before-reportingSkill
- when-to-use-and-avoidSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Document the failure mode of the chosen transport before writing code
- Distinctive: line 25
Test the chosen transport with the real client, not only with a hand-written message
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Transport Choice
Pick stdio or a network transport deliberately, based on where the server and its data actually live
Use when: a new server is being designed and the transport decision is still open
Avoid when: the runtime only supports one transport, which settles the question already
Procedure
- List where the server runs relative to the client: same host, container or remote
- Determine whether the server needs credentials the client already holds
- Choose stdio when the server shares the client's filesystem and lifetime
- Choose a network transport when several clients must share one server process
- Document the failure mode of the chosen transport before writing code
- Test the chosen transport with the real client, not only with a hand-written message
Signals
- a stdio server dies when the client exits, which is usually what you want
- a network server survives client restarts but needs its own auth story
- the transport choice changes how errors surface to the agent
- stdio avoids port conflicts entirely for local work
Patterns
1. Stdio fit
server reads packs from the same disk the agent runs on2. Network fit
two agents share one long-lived index3. Failure mode
stdio: client exit kills server; network: orphaned processPitfalls
- Choosing a network transport for a local file reader and inheriting an auth problem
- Assuming a hosted transport removes the need to validate tool arguments
- Testing with curl instead of the real client and missing handshake requirements
Done when
- the transport decision is recorded with its reason
- the chosen transport completes a full handshake with the real client
References
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

