agentleFS
Wsh7AshWsh7Ash/skillmcp/skills/protocol-version-handshake/SKILL.md

protocol-version-handshake

Skill0 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

Negotiate the protocol revision explicitly and pin the one the server actually implements. Use when the client may run a different protocol revision than the server was written against

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the client's requested protocolVersion from the initialize params

    line 20

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Protocol Version Handshake

Negotiate the protocol revision explicitly and pin the one the server actually implements

Use when: the client may run a different protocol revision than the server was written against

Avoid when: server and client ship together and are upgraded as one unit

Procedure

  1. Read the client's requested protocolVersion from the initialize params
  2. Decide the revision the server implements and state it in the response
  3. Reject or downgrade gracefully when the client asks for an unsupported revision
  4. Record the pinned revision in the README and in a constant
  5. Assert the revision in a conformance test so a silent change is caught
  6. Log both versions at handshake time to stderr for diagnosis

Signals

  • the initialize response names a revision the server genuinely implements
  • a mismatched client revision produces a clear error instead of odd behaviour
  • the pinned constant appears in exactly one place in the code
  • the conformance test fails when the constant is edited without the docs

Patterns

1. Pinned constant

PROTOCOL_VERSION = "2025-03-26"

2. Response shape

{"protocolVersion": PROTOCOL_VERSION, "capabilities": {...}}

3. Diagnostic log

handshake: client=2024-11-05 server=2025-03-26

Pitfalls

  • Echoing the client's requested version without implementing it
  • Scattering the version string through the code so a change is partial
  • Treating a version mismatch as a transport failure and retrying forever

Done when

  • the server names one revision in a single constant and returns it
  • a test asserts the returned revision equals the constant

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.