agentleFS
Wsh7AshWsh7Ash/skillmcp/skills/fixture-driven-transcript-tests/SKILL.md

fixture-driven-transcript-tests

Skill0 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

Keep a request/response transcript on disk and assert the server still matches it. Use when a protocol server has behaviours that must not drift across refactors

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Update the fixture in the same commit as an intended behaviour change

    line 25

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Fixture Driven Transcript Tests

Keep a request/response transcript on disk and assert the server still matches it

Use when: a protocol server has behaviours that must not drift across refactors

Avoid when: the server output is intentionally non-deterministic, such as timestamped logs

Procedure

  1. Record one transcript per behaviour: handshake, search, fetch, error
  2. Store requests and expected responses as separate JSON lines
  3. Drive the server with the request lines in a subprocess
  4. Compare the meaningful fields, ignoring volatile ones such as paths
  5. Fail the test on any unexpected field or missing reply
  6. Update the fixture in the same commit as an intended behaviour change

Signals

  • each transcript replays with identical semantic output
  • volatile fields are named in an ignore list
  • a deliberate behaviour change requires a fixture update in the same commit
  • the fixture set covers happy and error paths

Patterns

1. Pair files

handshake.requests.jsonl and handshake.expected.jsonl

2. Ignore list

ignore: serverInfo.version when bumped deliberately

3. Diff on failure

print the first differing field, not the whole payload

Pitfalls

  • Asserting the whole response including volatile fields, so tests fail for no reason
  • Regenerating fixtures blindly to make CI green
  • Testing through a client library that reformats the response

Done when

  • each behaviour has a committed transcript that replays identically
  • volatile fields are excluded by an explicit list

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.