tools-list-schema-validation
Skill0 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Validate every advertised schema as JSON Schema before a client tries to obey it. Use when a tool's input schema was edited and clients construct arguments from it
In this repository49 other files it gives its agents.
- argument-construction-from-artifactsSkill
- audit-log-of-tool-callsSkill
- bounded-output-designSkill
- capability-negotiation-checkSkill
- changelog-and-versioningSkill
- concurrency-and-ordering-checkSkill
- context-window-managementSkill
- credential-isolationSkill
- data-retention-policySkill
- description-as-contractSkill
- destructive-action-confirmationSkill
- destructive-tool-gatingSkill
- deterministic-command-choicesSkill
- done-when-criteriaSkill
- error-shape-for-agentsSkill
- fixture-driven-transcript-testsSkill
- human-in-the-loop-escalationSkill
- idempotency-annotationSkill
- input-schema-strictnessSkill
- least-privilege-tool-grantsSkill
- lifecycle-test-initialize-then-toolsSkill
- local-vs-remote-boundarySkill
- one-procedure-per-skillSkill
- pagination-and-limit-disciplineSkill
- parallel-tool-call-safetySkill
- protocol-conformance-testSkill
- protocol-version-handshakeSkill
- publishing-a-pack-locallySkill
- rate-limit-respectSkill
- reference-canonicalisationSkill
- replay-transcript-for-regressionSkill
- restart-and-reload-semanticsSkill
- scope-guard-before-executionSkill
- search-then-fetch-patternSkill
- secrets-via-environmentSkill
- server-discovery-and-trustSkill
- signal-and-pitfall-sectionsSkill
- skill-frontmatter-contractSkill
- stdio-client-configSkill
- stdout-purity-checkSkill
- third-party-server-sandboxingSkill
- tool-call-budgetingSkill
- tool-call-error-pathsSkill
- tool-error-without-retry-stormSkill
- tool-surface-minimisationSkill
- tool-verb-namingSkill
- transport-choiceSkill
- verify-tool-output-before-reportingSkill
- when-to-use-and-avoidSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Read tools/list output and collect every inputSchema
- Distinctive: line 21
Check each schema is an object with type object and a properties map
- Distinctive: line 22
Check required names exist in properties
- Distinctive: line 23
Check enums are non-empty and defaults satisfy their own constraints
- Distinctive: line 24
Check additionalProperties is explicitly false where strictness is intended
- Distinctive: line 25
Add the checks to the test suite so a schema edit cannot regress
- Distinctive: line 29
no required key is missing from properties
- Distinctive: line 30
every enum has at least one value
- Distinctive: line 31
no default value violates its own bounds
- Distinctive: line 62
every advertised schema passes the structural checks
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Tools List Schema Validation
Validate every advertised schema as JSON Schema before a client tries to obey it
Use when: a tool's input schema was edited and clients construct arguments from it
Avoid when: the tool takes no arguments and its schema is a constant empty object
Procedure
- Read tools/list output and collect every inputSchema
- Check each schema is an object with type object and a properties map
- Check required names exist in properties
- Check enums are non-empty and defaults satisfy their own constraints
- Check additionalProperties is explicitly false where strictness is intended
- Add the checks to the test suite so a schema edit cannot regress
Signals
- no required key is missing from properties
- every enum has at least one value
- no default value violates its own bounds
- strict tools declare additionalProperties false
Patterns
1. Required check
set(schema['required']) <= set(schema['properties'])2. Bounds check
1 <= default <= maximum3. Strictness
additionalProperties is False, not absentPitfalls
- Assuming a client validates the schema and finding out it does not
- Leaving a default outside its own min or max
- Declaring required keys that the handler treats as optional
Done when
- every advertised schema passes the structural checks
- the checks run in CI on every change
References
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

