agentleFS
Wsh7AshWsh7Ash/skillmcp/skills/protocol-conformance-test/SKILL.md

protocol-conformance-test

Skill0 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

Test the wire protocol directly, so a client bug and a server bug are distinguishable. Use when a client reports a failure and the server's own behaviour is unproven

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write the exact JSON-RPC lines the client should send

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Check the jsonrpc field, id echo and error codes

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep the transcript as a fixture so the test is reproducible

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    every response echoes the request id

    line 29

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Protocol Conformance Test

Test the wire protocol directly, so a client bug and a server bug are distinguishable

Use when: a client reports a failure and the server's own behaviour is unproven

Avoid when: the server is a thin library wrapper with no wire protocol of its own

Procedure

  1. Write the exact JSON-RPC lines the client should send
  2. Pipe them into the server process with a bounded timeout
  3. Assert the response shape, not only the presence of a reply
  4. Check the jsonrpc field, id echo and error codes
  5. Repeat for a malformed line and for an unknown method
  6. Keep the transcript as a fixture so the test is reproducible

Signals

  • every response echoes the request id
  • malformed input produces a parse error, not a crash
  • an unknown method produces method-not-found
  • the server keeps serving after an error line

Patterns

1. Piped transcript

printf '%s\n' '{"jsonrpc":"2.0",...}' | python -m skillmcp serve

2. Shape assertion

jsonrpc == '2.0' and id == sent id

3. Survival check

send a bad line, then a good one, expect two replies

Pitfalls

  • Testing through the client library, which hides the raw response
  • Asserting only that some output appeared
  • Forgetting that a server which crashes on a bad line fails every later call

Done when

  • happy path, malformed line and unknown method each have a fixture
  • the server is shown to survive an error line

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.