agentleFS
Wsh7AshWsh7Ash/skillmcp/skills/third-party-server-sandboxing/SKILL.md

third-party-server-sandboxing

Skill0 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub

Run untrusted tool servers with the smallest filesystem and network reach that still works. Use when a server you did not write is part of the toolchain

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run it as a user with access to only those paths

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    Check the server still works under the restriction

    line 24

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Third Party Server Sandboxing

Run untrusted tool servers with the smallest filesystem and network reach that still works

Use when: a server you did not write is part of the toolchain

Avoid when: the server is written and reviewed in-house with matching review history

Procedure

  1. Determine the directories and hosts the server must reach
  2. Run it as a user with access to only those paths
  3. Block outbound network access when the server is a local reader
  4. Give it a read-only mount for content it should not modify
  5. Check the server still works under the restriction
  6. Record the sandbox in the README so it survives reinstallation

Signals

  • the server cannot read outside its granted directory
  • outbound connections fail for a server that should not make any
  • writes to the read-only mount are refused
  • the server's documented purpose still works under restriction

Patterns

1. Read-only mount

bind mount packs as ro

2. No egress

container with no network namespace

3. User scope

run as a dedicated unprivileged user

Pitfalls

  • Running a third-party server as your own user with home directory access
  • Granting network access because installation was easier that way
  • Sandboxing so tightly that the server silently returns empty results

Done when

  • the server runs with the documented minimal reach
  • a read outside its grant is proven to fail

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.