agentleFS
Wsh7AshWsh7Ash/skillmcp/skills/capability-negotiation-check/SKILL.md

capability-negotiation-check

Skill0 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

Declare only the capabilities the server implements and refuse calls outside them. Use when the server exposes tools and the client must know whether to look for resources or prompts

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Verify the client only calls what was advertised

    line 23
  2. Distinctive:

    Add a test that asserts undeclared capabilities are refused

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    Update the declaration the same commit a new capability ships

    line 25

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Capability Negotiation Check

Declare only the capabilities the server implements and refuse calls outside them

Use when: the server exposes tools and the client must know whether to look for resources or prompts

Avoid when: the server is a thin wrapper over one tool and capability breadth is irrelevant

Procedure

  1. List what the server can do: tools, resources, prompts, sampling
  2. Declare exactly that subset in the initialize response
  3. Return method-not-found for capabilities that were not declared
  4. Verify the client only calls what was advertised
  5. Add a test that asserts undeclared capabilities are refused
  6. Update the declaration the same commit a new capability ships

Signals

  • the response capabilities block matches the implemented handlers
  • an undeclared method returns a JSON-RPC method-not-found error
  • the client hides features the server did not advertise
  • a new handler without a capability entry is caught by the test

Patterns

1. Tools only

"capabilities": {"tools": {"listChanged": false}}

2. Refusal shape

method_not_found for resources/list when undeclared

3. Parity test

declared capabilities == implemented handlers

Pitfalls

  • Declaring resources because a future version might add them
  • Leaving an undeclared handler reachable, which clients will not exercise and tests will not cover
  • Forgetting listChanged semantics when the tool list is dynamic

Done when

  • declared capabilities match implemented handlers exactly
  • undeclared methods return a clean JSON-RPC error

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.