agentleFS
Wsh7AshWsh7Ash/skillmcp/skills/argument-construction-from-artifacts/SKILL.md

argument-construction-from-artifacts

Skill0 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

Build tool arguments from captured artifacts rather than from memory, so ids and paths are exact. Use when a tool needs an identifier that already exists in a capture, report or file

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check the returned record refers to the same identifier

    line 24
  2. Distinctive:

    no argument was reconstructed from memory

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    every exact-value argument is copied from a named artifact

    line 62

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Argument Construction From Artifacts

Build tool arguments from captured artifacts rather than from memory, so ids and paths are exact

Use when: a tool needs an identifier that already exists in a capture, report or file

Avoid when: the argument is a free-text query with no exactness requirement

Procedure

  1. Locate the artifact that holds the exact value
  2. Copy the value rather than retyping it
  3. Confirm the value's shape against the schema before the call
  4. Pass the smallest necessary set of arguments
  5. Check the returned record refers to the same identifier
  6. Record the source artifact beside the call for traceability

Signals

  • the identifier in the call is byte-identical to the one in the artifact
  • the result references the same object, not a similar one
  • no argument was reconstructed from memory
  • the source file path appears in the notes

Patterns

1. Copy not retype

slug taken from pack.json rather than the report

2. Shape check

value matches ^[a-z0-9]+(-[a-z0-9]+)*$ before the call

3. Traceability

argument source: results/catalog.md line 42

Pitfalls

  • Reconstructing a UUID or hash from memory and getting a near-miss
  • Passing a display name where the tool expects a slug
  • Losing the artifact reference so the call cannot be audited

Done when

  • every exact-value argument is copied from a named artifact
  • the result is confirmed to reference the same identifier

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.