tool-call-budgeting
Skill0 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Decide the call budget for a task before starting so an agent cannot loop on a tool. Use when an agent may retry or search repeatedly and each call costs context and latency
In this repository49 other files it gives its agents.
- argument-construction-from-artifactsSkill
- audit-log-of-tool-callsSkill
- bounded-output-designSkill
- capability-negotiation-checkSkill
- changelog-and-versioningSkill
- concurrency-and-ordering-checkSkill
- context-window-managementSkill
- credential-isolationSkill
- data-retention-policySkill
- description-as-contractSkill
- destructive-action-confirmationSkill
- destructive-tool-gatingSkill
- deterministic-command-choicesSkill
- done-when-criteriaSkill
- error-shape-for-agentsSkill
- fixture-driven-transcript-testsSkill
- human-in-the-loop-escalationSkill
- idempotency-annotationSkill
- input-schema-strictnessSkill
- least-privilege-tool-grantsSkill
- lifecycle-test-initialize-then-toolsSkill
- local-vs-remote-boundarySkill
- one-procedure-per-skillSkill
- pagination-and-limit-disciplineSkill
- parallel-tool-call-safetySkill
- protocol-conformance-testSkill
- protocol-version-handshakeSkill
- publishing-a-pack-locallySkill
- rate-limit-respectSkill
- reference-canonicalisationSkill
- replay-transcript-for-regressionSkill
- restart-and-reload-semanticsSkill
- scope-guard-before-executionSkill
- search-then-fetch-patternSkill
- secrets-via-environmentSkill
- server-discovery-and-trustSkill
- signal-and-pitfall-sectionsSkill
- skill-frontmatter-contractSkill
- stdio-client-configSkill
- stdout-purity-checkSkill
- third-party-server-sandboxingSkill
- tool-call-error-pathsSkill
- tool-error-without-retry-stormSkill
- tools-list-schema-validationSkill
- tool-surface-minimisationSkill
- tool-verb-namingSkill
- transport-choiceSkill
- verify-tool-output-before-reportingSkill
- when-to-use-and-avoidSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Write that number down as a ceiling before the first call
- Distinctive: line 23
Stop and reassess when the ceiling is reached, rather than making one more
- Distinctive: line 63
no identical call is sent twice in one task
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Tool Call Budgeting
Decide the call budget for a task before starting so an agent cannot loop on a tool
Use when: an agent may retry or search repeatedly and each call costs context and latency
Avoid when: the task needs exactly one call, where a budget adds no constraint
Procedure
- Estimate how many calls the task genuinely needs
- Write that number down as a ceiling before the first call
- Count each call in the working notes
- Stop and reassess when the ceiling is reached, rather than making one more
- Replace repeated calls with a single broader query where possible
- Record whether the ceiling was hit, because that is a signal about the tool
Signals
- the call count stays within the written ceiling
- the same arguments are never sent twice
- a hit ceiling triggers a reassessment instead of another attempt
- the notes show why each call was made
Patterns
1. Call ceiling
budget: 3 search calls, 1 fetch for this step2. No repeats
identical arguments -> use the cached result3. Reassess marker
budget reached: results too broad, refine keywordsPitfalls
- Retrying identical calls hoping for a different answer
- Counting only successful calls and ignoring errors that also cost time
- Raising the budget mid-task because progress feels slow
Done when
- a ceiling is stated before the first call and compared afterwards
- no identical call is sent twice in one task
References
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

