agentleFS
Postpartum-genushyacinthus29Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/skills/dotnet-netarchtest/SKILL.md

dotnet-netarchtest

Skill13 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use the open-source free `NetArchTest.Rules` library for architecture rules in .NET unit tests. Use when a repo wants lightweight, fluent architecture assertions for namespaces, dependencies, or layering.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.

    line 34
  3. Very specific:

    Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.

    line 35
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep rules readable and close to the boundary they protect.

    line 44
  5. Very specific:

    If NetArchTest.Rules is not configured yet:

    line 49
  6. Distinctive:

    Add the package to the architecture test project:

    line 53
  7. Distinctive:

    Add at least one executable boundary rule test.

    line 55
  8. Very specific:

    Run dotnet test TEST_PROJECT.csproj and return status: configured or status: improved.

    line 57
  9. Very specific:

    If richer modeling is required and ArchUnitNET is chosen as the standard, return status: not_applicable.

    line 58
  10. Distinctive:

    Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

    line 73
  11. Distinctive:

    write a detailed execution plan

    line 78
  12. Distinctive:

    Update the plan after each iteration.

    line 83
  13. Very specific:

    If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

    line 85

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

NetArchTest

Trigger On

  • the repo uses or wants NetArchTest.Rules
  • architecture rules should be enforced in automated tests

Value

  • produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
  • reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
  • leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

Do Not Use For

  • very rich architecture modeling that needs a heavier DSL

Inputs

  • the nearest AGENTS.md
  • architecture boundaries to enforce
  • target assemblies

Quick Start

  1. Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
  2. Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
  3. Return the Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.

Workflow

  1. Encode only durable architecture rules:
    • forbidden dependencies
    • namespace layering
    • type shape conventions
  2. Keep rules readable and close to the boundary they protect.
  3. Fail tests on architecture drift, not on temporary style noise.

Bootstrap When Missing

If NetArchTest.Rules is not configured yet:

  1. Detect existing setup:
    • rg -n "NetArchTest\\.Rules" -g '*.csproj' .
  2. Add the package to the architecture test project:
    • dotnet add TEST_PROJECT.csproj package NetArchTest.Rules
  3. Add at least one executable boundary rule test.
  4. Wire architecture tests into the standard test command in AGENTS.md and CI.
  5. Run dotnet test TEST_PROJECT.csproj and return status: configured or status: improved.
  6. If richer modeling is required and ArchUnitNET is chosen as the standard, return status: not_applicable.

Deliver

  • architecture tests that are understandable and stable
  • boundary checks wired into the normal test path used by agents and CI

Validate

  • the rules map to real boundaries the team cares about
  • failures point to actionable dependency drift

Ralph Loop

Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

  1. Plan first (mandatory):
    • analyze current state
    • define target outcome, constraints, and risks
    • write a detailed execution plan
    • list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
  2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
  3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
  4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
  5. Update the plan after each iteration.
  6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
  7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

Required Result Format

  • status: complete | clean | improved | configured | not_applicable | blocked
  • plan: concise plan and current iteration step
  • actions_taken: concrete changes made
  • validation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
  • verification: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
  • remaining: top unresolved items or none

For setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.

Load References

  • references/patterns.md
  • references/examples.md
  • references/netarchtest.md

Example Requests

  • "Add architecture tests with NetArchTest."
  • "Block UI from referencing data directly."

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.