agentleFS
Postpartum-genushyacinthus29Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/skills/dotnet-mstest/SKILL.md

dotnet-mstest

Skill13 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write, run, or repair .NET tests that use MSTest. Use when a repo uses `MSTest.Sdk`, `MSTest`, `[TestClass]`, `[TestMethod]`, `DataRow`, or Microsoft.Testing.Platform-based MSTest execution.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.

    line 37
  3. Very specific:

    Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.

    line 38
  4. Very specific:

    Read the repo's real test command from AGENTS.md.

    line 47
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep the runner model consistent:

    line 48
  6. Very specific:

    do not pass VSTest-only switches or assume legacy .runsettings behavior on Microsoft.Testing.Platform jobs

    line 51
  7. Very specific:

    Prefer [DataRow] or DynamicData for stable data-driven coverage.

    line 52
  8. Distinctive:

    Keep MSTest analyzers enabled and fix findings instead of muting them casually.

    line 53
  9. Distinctive:

    If MSTest is requested but not configured:

    line 58
  10. Very specific:

    If the repo currently uses xUnit or TUnit, do not auto-migrate.

    line 62
  11. Very specific:

    Document runner model (MSTest.Sdk default MTP vs UseVSTest) in AGENTS.md.

    line 65
  12. Very specific:

    Run dotnet test TEST_PROJECT.csproj and return status: configured or status: improved.

    line 66
  13. Distinctive:

    test commands match that runner

    line 78
  14. Distinctive:

    Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

    line 84
  15. Distinctive:

    write a detailed execution plan

    line 89
  16. Distinctive:

    Update the plan after each iteration.

    line 94
  17. Very specific:

    If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

    line 96

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

MSTest

Trigger On

  • the repo uses MSTest
  • you need to add, run, debug, or repair MSTest tests
  • the repo is moving between VSTest and Microsoft.Testing.Platform

Value

  • produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
  • reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
  • leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

Do Not Use For

  • xUnit projects
  • TUnit projects
  • generic test strategy with no MSTest-specific mechanics

Inputs

  • the nearest AGENTS.md
  • the test project file and package references
  • the active MSTest runner model

Quick Start

  1. Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
  2. Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
  3. Return the Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.

Workflow

  1. Detect the MSTest project style first:
    • MSTest.Sdk project SDK
    • MSTest meta-package
    • legacy package set with explicit Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk
  2. Read the repo's real test command from AGENTS.md. If the repo has no explicit command yet, start with dotnet test PROJECT_OR_SOLUTION.
  3. Keep the runner model consistent:
    • MSTest.Sdk defaults to the MSTest runner on Microsoft.Testing.Platform
    • VSTest is opt-in with UseVSTest=true or legacy package choices
    • do not pass VSTest-only switches or assume legacy .runsettings behavior on Microsoft.Testing.Platform jobs
  4. Prefer [DataRow] or DynamicData for stable data-driven coverage. Keep test lifecycle hooks minimal and deterministic.
  5. Keep MSTest analyzers enabled and fix findings instead of muting them casually.
  6. Align coverage/reporting packages with the active runner.

Bootstrap When Missing

If MSTest is requested but not configured:

  1. Detect current framework first:
    • rg -n "MSTest\\.Sdk|PackageReference Include=\"MSTest\"|xunit|TUnit|UseVSTest|TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport" -g '*.csproj' .
  2. If the repo currently uses xUnit or TUnit, do not auto-migrate. Return status: not_applicable unless migration is explicitly requested.
  3. For explicit MSTest adoption, add package(s) to target test project:
    • dotnet add TEST_PROJECT.csproj package MSTest
  4. Document runner model (MSTest.Sdk default MTP vs UseVSTest) in AGENTS.md.
  5. Run dotnet test TEST_PROJECT.csproj and return status: configured or status: improved.

Deliver

  • MSTest tests that match the repo's runner model
  • commands that work in local and CI runs
  • explicit guidance for VSTest versus Microsoft.Testing.Platform usage

Validate

  • the runner model is documented and consistent
  • test commands match that runner
  • data-driven tests stay deterministic
  • analyzer, coverage, and reporting packages align with the chosen runner

Ralph Loop

Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

  1. Plan first (mandatory):
    • analyze current state
    • define target outcome, constraints, and risks
    • write a detailed execution plan
    • list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
  2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
  3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
  4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
  5. Update the plan after each iteration.
  6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
  7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

Required Result Format

  • status: complete | clean | improved | configured | not_applicable | blocked
  • plan: concise plan and current iteration step
  • actions_taken: concrete changes made
  • validation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
  • verification: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
  • remaining: top unresolved items or none

For setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.

Load References

  • references/mstest.md
  • references/patterns.md
  • references/anti-patterns.md

Example Requests

  • "Fix our MSTest runner setup."
  • "Add an MSTest regression test."
  • "Move this MSTest project to Microsoft.Testing.Platform safely."

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.