agentleFS
Postpartum-genushyacinthus29Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/skills/dotnet-analyzer-config/SKILL.md

dotnet-analyzer-config

Skill13 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use a repo-root `.editorconfig` to configure free .NET analyzer and style rules. Use when a .NET repo needs rule severity, code-style options, section layout, or analyzer ownership made explicit. Nested `.editorconfig` files are allowed when they serve a clear subtree-specific purpose.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

18 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 12 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 12

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.

    line 36
  3. Very specific:

    Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.

    line 37
  4. Very specific:

    Prefer one repo-root .editorconfig with root = true.

    line 42
  5. Very specific:

    Add nested .editorconfig files when a subtree has a clear scoped purpose, such as stricter rules, different generated-code handling, or a …

    line 43
  6. Very specific:

    Keep severity in .editorconfig, not scattered through IDE settings.

    line 44
  7. Very specific:

    Write the file as real EditorConfig, not as a made-up .NET variant:

    line 45
  8. Very specific:

    Keep bulk switches such as EnableNETAnalyzers in MSBuild files, not in .editorconfig.

    line 50
  9. Very specific:

    Treat .globalconfig as an exceptional case, not the normal repo setup.

    line 51
  10. Distinctive:

    If analyzer configuration is requested but not structured yet:

    line 55
  11. Very specific:

    Create or normalize one repo-root .editorconfig with root = true.

    line 60
  12. Very specific:

    Add nested .editorconfig files only when a subtree really needs different scoped policy.

    line 62
  13. Very specific:

    Run dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT and return status: configured or status: improved.

    line 63
  14. Very specific:

    If the repo intentionally uses another documented analyzer-config ownership model, return status: not_applicable.

    line 64
  15. Distinctive:

    Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

    line 79
  16. Distinctive:

    write a detailed execution plan

    line 84
  17. Distinctive:

    Update the plan after each iteration.

    line 89
  18. Very specific:

    If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

    line 91

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

.NET Analyzer Configuration

Trigger On

  • the repo needs a root .editorconfig
  • analyzer severity and style ownership are unclear
  • the team wants one source of truth for rule configuration

Value

  • produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
  • reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
  • leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

Do Not Use For

  • choosing analyzers with no config change
  • formatting-only execution with no config ownership question

Inputs

  • the nearest AGENTS.md
  • current .editorconfig
  • any Directory.Build.props overrides

Quick Start

  1. Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
  2. Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
  3. Return the Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.

Workflow

  1. Prefer one repo-root .editorconfig with root = true.
  2. Add nested .editorconfig files when a subtree has a clear scoped purpose, such as stricter rules, different generated-code handling, or a different policy for tests or legacy code.
  3. Keep severity in .editorconfig, not scattered through IDE settings.
  4. Write the file as real EditorConfig, not as a made-up .NET variant:
    • lowercase filename .editorconfig
    • root = true in the preamble
    • no inline comments
    • forward slashes in globs
  5. Keep bulk switches such as EnableNETAnalyzers in MSBuild files, not in .editorconfig.
  6. Treat .globalconfig as an exceptional case, not the normal repo setup.

Bootstrap When Missing

If analyzer configuration is requested but not structured yet:

  1. Detect current state:
    • rg --files -g '.editorconfig' -g '.globalconfig'
    • rg -n "EnableNETAnalyzers|AnalysisLevel|AnalysisMode" -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .
  2. Create or normalize one repo-root .editorconfig with root = true.
  3. Move rule severity into .editorconfig and keep bulk analyzer switches in project or MSBuild config.
  4. Add nested .editorconfig files only when a subtree really needs different scoped policy.
  5. Run dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT and return status: configured or status: improved.
  6. If the repo intentionally uses another documented analyzer-config ownership model, return status: not_applicable.

Deliver

  • one explicit analyzer configuration ownership model
  • a root .editorconfig layout that agents can extend safely

Validate

  • rule severity is reproducible in local and CI builds
  • IDE-only settings do not silently override repo policy
  • the default path is a root .editorconfig, not a surprise alternative

Ralph Loop

Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

  1. Plan first (mandatory):
    • analyze current state
    • define target outcome, constraints, and risks
    • write a detailed execution plan
    • list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
  2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
  3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
  4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
  5. Update the plan after each iteration.
  6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
  7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

Required Result Format

  • status: complete | clean | improved | configured | not_applicable | blocked
  • plan: concise plan and current iteration step
  • actions_taken: concrete changes made
  • validation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
  • verification: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
  • remaining: top unresolved items or none

For setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.

Load References

  • references/analyzer-config.md
  • references/template.md
  • references/rules.md

Example Requests

  • "Make .editorconfig the source of truth."
  • "Write a proper root .editorconfig for this repo."
  • "Fix conflicting analyzer severities in this .NET repo."

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.