dotnet-managedcode-storage
Skill13 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use ManagedCode.Storage when a .NET application needs a provider-agnostic storage abstraction with explicit configuration, container selection, upload and download flows, and backend-specific integration kept behind one library contract.
In this repository84 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- dotnet-analyzer-configSkill
- dotnet-architectureSkill
- dotnet-archunitnetSkill
- dotnet-aspireSkill
- dotnet-aspnet-coreSkill
- dotnet-asynkron-profilerSkill
- dotnet-azure-functionsSkill
- dotnet-biomeSkill
- dotnet-blazorSkill
- dotnet-chousSkill
- dotnet-clocSkill
- dotnet-code-analysisSkill
- dotnet-codeqlSkill
- dotnet-code-reviewSkill
- dotnet-complexitySkill
- dotnet-coverletSkill
- dotnet-csharpierSkill
- dotnet-entity-framework6Skill
- dotnet-entity-framework-coreSkill
- dotnet-eslintSkill
- dotnet-formatSkill
- dotnet-grpcSkill
- dotnet-htmlhintSkill
- dotnet-legacy-aspnetSkill
- dotnet-libvlcSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-communicationSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-markitdownSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-mimetypesSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-orleans-graphSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-orleans-signalrSkill
- dotnet-mauiSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-agile-deliverySkill
- dotnet-mcaf-devexSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-documentationSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-feature-specSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planningSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-ml-ai-deliverySkill
- dotnet-mcaf-nfrSkill
- dotnet-mcafSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-source-controlSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-ui-uxSkill
- dotnet-mcpSkill
- dotnet-metalintSkill
- dotnet-meziantou-analyzerSkill
- dotnet-microsoft-agent-frameworkSkill
- dotnet-microsoft-extensions-aiSkill
- dotnet-microsoft-extensionsSkill
- dotnet-minimal-apisSkill
- dotnet-mixed-realitySkill
- dotnet-mlnetSkill
- dotnet-modern-csharpSkill
- dotnet-mstestSkill
- dotnet-mvvmSkill
- dotnet-netarchtestSkill
- dotnet-nunitSkill
- dotnet-orleansSkill
- dotnet-profilingSkill
- dotnet-project-setupSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Verify whether the project wants one storage contract instead of provider-specific SDK calls scattered across the codebase.
- Distinctive: line 25
Keep application code dependent on the library abstraction, not directly on backend-specific storage SDKs unless a provider-only feature is …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ManagedCode.Storage
Trigger On
- integrating
ManagedCode.Storageinto a .NET application - reviewing how a project abstracts file or object storage
- deciding whether to centralize storage provider differences behind one library
- documenting upload, download, container, or blob-handling flows with ManagedCode.Storage
Workflow
- Identify the actual storage use case:
- blob or file storage
- provider abstraction across environments
- app-service integration and configuration
- Verify whether the project wants one storage contract instead of provider-specific SDK calls scattered across the codebase.
- Keep application code dependent on the library abstraction, not directly on backend-specific storage SDKs unless a provider-only feature is truly required.
- Centralize provider configuration, credentials, and container naming in composition-root code and typed settings.
- Validate the real upload, download, existence-check, and deletion flows after wiring the library.
flowchart LR
A["Application service"] --> B["ManagedCode.Storage abstraction"]
B --> C["Provider-specific storage implementation"]
C --> D["Blob or object storage backend"]Deliver
- concrete guidance on when ManagedCode.Storage is the right abstraction
- wiring guidance that keeps provider concerns out of business code
- verification steps for the storage flows the application actually uses
Validate
- the project really benefits from a storage abstraction and is not hiding provider-specific behavior it still needs
- storage configuration is centralized and explicit
- code reviews check real read and write paths, not only registration snippets
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

