dotnet-asynkron-profiler
Skill13 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use the open-source free `Asynkron.Profiler` dotnet tool for CLI-first CPU, allocation, exception, contention, and heap profiling of .NET commands or existing trace artifacts.
In this repository84 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- dotnet-analyzer-configSkill
- dotnet-architectureSkill
- dotnet-archunitnetSkill
- dotnet-aspireSkill
- dotnet-aspnet-coreSkill
- dotnet-azure-functionsSkill
- dotnet-biomeSkill
- dotnet-blazorSkill
- dotnet-chousSkill
- dotnet-clocSkill
- dotnet-code-analysisSkill
- dotnet-codeqlSkill
- dotnet-code-reviewSkill
- dotnet-complexitySkill
- dotnet-coverletSkill
- dotnet-csharpierSkill
- dotnet-entity-framework6Skill
- dotnet-entity-framework-coreSkill
- dotnet-eslintSkill
- dotnet-formatSkill
- dotnet-grpcSkill
- dotnet-htmlhintSkill
- dotnet-legacy-aspnetSkill
- dotnet-libvlcSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-communicationSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-markitdownSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-mimetypesSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-orleans-graphSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-orleans-signalrSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-storageSkill
- dotnet-mauiSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-agile-deliverySkill
- dotnet-mcaf-devexSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-documentationSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-feature-specSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planningSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-ml-ai-deliverySkill
- dotnet-mcaf-nfrSkill
- dotnet-mcafSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-source-controlSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-ui-uxSkill
- dotnet-mcpSkill
- dotnet-metalintSkill
- dotnet-meziantou-analyzerSkill
- dotnet-microsoft-agent-frameworkSkill
- dotnet-microsoft-extensions-aiSkill
- dotnet-microsoft-extensionsSkill
- dotnet-minimal-apisSkill
- dotnet-mixed-realitySkill
- dotnet-mlnetSkill
- dotnet-modern-csharpSkill
- dotnet-mstestSkill
- dotnet-mvvmSkill
- dotnet-netarchtestSkill
- dotnet-nunitSkill
- dotnet-orleansSkill
- dotnet-profilingSkill
- dotnet-project-setupSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Prefer built Release output over dotnet run so the trace represents the target app rather than restore/build noise.
- Very specific: line 32
Use --input <path> when the trace already exists and the task is about rendering or narrowing the report, not recollecting data.
- Very specific: line 38
Treat profile-output/ as the stable output folder for review artifacts and reruns.
- Very specific: line 39
If the task needs process attach, counters, or raw official diagnostics flows rather than this CLI frontend, hand off to dotnet-profiling.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Asynkron.Profiler
Trigger On
- the repo wants
Asynkron.Profilerorasynkron-profiler - the user wants automation-friendly profiling output instead of GUI-only tooling
- profiling needs are CPU, allocation, exception, contention, or heap focused and should land as plain-text summaries in CI, scripts, or agent workflows
- the task needs to render an existing
.nettrace,.speedscope.json,.etlx, or.gcdumpfile into a readable report
Workflow
- Decide whether the task is a new profile capture or rendering an existing trace artifact.
- Prefer built
Releaseoutput overdotnet runso the trace represents the target app rather than restore/build noise. - Install and verify all three tools before assuming the profiler is usable:
asynkron-profilerdotnet-tracedotnet-gcdump
- Choose exactly one primary mode first:
--cpu--memory--exception--contention--heap
- Use
--input <path>when the trace already exists and the task is about rendering or narrowing the report, not recollecting data. - Refine the output only after the baseline run:
--root <text>to anchor the call tree--filter <text>to trim tables--exception-type <text>for exception-heavy flows--calltree-depth,--calltree-width,--calltree-self,--calltree-sibling-cutoff
- Treat
profile-output/as the stable output folder for review artifacts and reruns. - If the task needs process attach, counters, or raw official diagnostics flows rather than this CLI frontend, hand off to
dotnet-profiling.
Architecture
flowchart LR
A["Profiling task"] --> B{"New run or existing artifact?"}
B -->|New run| C["Build target in Release"]
C --> D["Run `asynkron-profiler --mode -- <command|csproj|sln>`"]
D --> E["Collect via `dotnet-trace` or `dotnet-gcdump`"]
E --> F["Write reports to `profile-output/`"]
B -->|Existing artifact| G["Run `asynkron-profiler --input <path> [--mode]`"]
G --> F
F --> H["Refine output with `--root`, `--filter`, and call tree flags"]Install
- Install the profiler tool from upstream:
dotnet tool install -g asynkron-profiler --prerelease- Install prerequisites:
dotnet tool install -g dotnet-trace
dotnet tool install -g dotnet-gcdump- Verify the toolchain:
asynkron-profiler --help
dotnet-trace --version
dotnet-gcdump --versionPractical Usage
Capture a new profile
dotnet build -c Release
asynkron-profiler --cpu -- ./bin/Release/<tfm>/MyAppFramework-dependent apps can run through dotnet:
asynkron-profiler --memory -- dotnet ./bin/Release/<tfm>/MyApp.dllProject and solution paths are also valid when the tool should build and run for you:
asynkron-profiler --contention -- ./MyApp.csproj
asynkron-profiler --exception -- ./MySolution.slnRender an existing trace
asynkron-profiler --input ./profile-output/app.nettrace --cpu
asynkron-profiler --input ./profile-output/app.etlx --memory
asynkron-profiler --input ./profile-output/app.gcdump --heapManual collection with the official tools still fits when the trace must be captured separately:
dotnet-trace collect --output ./profile-output/app.nettrace -- dotnet run MyProject.sln
asynkron-profiler --input ./profile-output/app.nettrace --cpuOption Patterns
- mode flags:
--cpufor sampled hotspots--memoryfor GC allocation ticks and per-type call trees--exceptionfor thrown counts and throw-site trees--contentionfor wait-time trees--heapfor retained heap shape viadotnet-gcdump
- scope and readability:
--root <text>to focus the tree on a subsystem--filter <text>to narrow function tables--exception-type <text>when one exception dominates the signal
- output shaping:
--calltree-depth <n>--calltree-width <n>--calltree-self--calltree-sibling-cutoff <n>
- trace replay and project targeting:
--input <path>for.nettrace,.speedscope.json,.etlx, or.gcdump--tfm <tfm>when the profiler must resolve a specific target framework from a.csprojor.sln
Constraints
- upstream currently documents
.NET SDK 10.xas the supported toolchain baseline dotnet runis supported but usually produces noisy traces because it captures host, restore, and build work- the tool is a frontend over
dotnet-traceanddotnet-gcdump, so missing prerequisites or blocked diagnostics IPC will break runs --heapcaptures retained heap shape, not CPU or allocation timelines- this skill is for launched commands or existing trace files; if the task is process attach, counters, or raw trace authoring, prefer
dotnet-profiling
Deliver
- a repeatable
asynkron-profilercommand path for the profiling mode that matches the problem - explicit install and prerequisite commands
- a clear baseline command plus any focused
--root,--filter,--exception-type, or call-tree options needed for readable output - trace replay guidance when the task starts from an existing artifact
Validate
asynkron-profiler --help,dotnet-trace --version, anddotnet-gcdump --versionall succeed- the chosen profiling mode matches the question being investigated
- the command profiles built
Releaseoutput unless there is a documented reason to acceptdotnet runnoise profile-output/contains the expected report or artifact after the run- any replay flow uses an input file type that matches the selected mode
References
- overview.md - tool positioning, install paths, prerequisites, and when to choose it over raw diagnostics CLIs
- commands.md - command patterns for capture, replay, and option tuning
- examples.md - mode-by-mode examples, output expectations, and troubleshooting checks
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

