agentleFS
Postpartum-genushyacinthus29Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/skills/dotnet-codeql/SKILL.md

dotnet-codeql

Skill13 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use the open-source CodeQL ecosystem for .NET security analysis. Use when a repo needs CodeQL query packs, CLI-based analysis on open source codebases, or GitHub Action setup with explicit licensing caveats for private repositories.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.

    line 34
  3. Very specific:

    Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.

    line 35
  4. Distinctive:

    Treat CodeQL as a security-analysis tool, not as a style checker.

    line 40
  5. Distinctive:

    Prefer manual build mode for compiled .NET projects when precision matters.

    line 42
  6. Very specific:

    If CodeQL is not configured yet:

    line 46
  7. Very specific:

    Prefer CI-first setup for repository scanning using github/codeql-action/init and github/codeql-action/analyze.

    line 51
  8. Distinctive:

    Add local CLI usage only when the task requires local query work.

    line 53
  9. Very specific:

    Run the workflow or local analyze path and return status: configured or status: improved.

    line 54
  10. Very specific:

    If licensing or hosting constraints reject CodeQL for this repo, return status: not_applicable with caveat documented.

    line 55
  11. Distinctive:

    Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

    line 70
  12. Distinctive:

    write a detailed execution plan

    line 75
  13. Distinctive:

    Update the plan after each iteration.

    line 80
  14. Very specific:

    If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

    line 82

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

CodeQL for .NET

Trigger On

  • the repo uses or wants CodeQL for .NET security analysis
  • GitHub code scanning is part of the CI plan

Value

  • produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
  • reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
  • leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

Do Not Use For

  • teams that need a tool with no private-repo licensing caveat

Inputs

  • the nearest AGENTS.md
  • hosting model: open-source repo, private repo, or manual CLI workflow
  • current GitHub Actions workflow

Quick Start

  1. Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
  2. Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
  3. Return the Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.

Workflow

  1. Treat CodeQL as a security-analysis tool, not as a style checker.
  2. Make the licensing and hosting model explicit before proposing it as the default gate.
  3. Prefer manual build mode for compiled .NET projects when precision matters.

Bootstrap When Missing

If CodeQL is not configured yet:

  1. Detect current state:
    • rg -n "codeql-action|security-events|CodeQL" .github/workflows
    • command -v codeql
  2. Prefer CI-first setup for repository scanning using github/codeql-action/init and github/codeql-action/analyze.
  3. Configure explicit .NET build mode in workflow (manual when precision matters).
  4. Add local CLI usage only when the task requires local query work.
  5. Run the workflow or local analyze path and return status: configured or status: improved.
  6. If licensing or hosting constraints reject CodeQL for this repo, return status: not_applicable with caveat documented.

Deliver

  • explicit CodeQL setup or an explicit rejection with caveat documented
  • reproducible CI or local commands for running CodeQL in this repo

Validate

  • the chosen CodeQL path is allowed for the repo type
  • build mode is documented and reproducible

Ralph Loop

Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

  1. Plan first (mandatory):
    • analyze current state
    • define target outcome, constraints, and risks
    • write a detailed execution plan
    • list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
  2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
  3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
  4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
  5. Update the plan after each iteration.
  6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
  7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

Required Result Format

  • status: complete | clean | improved | configured | not_applicable | blocked
  • plan: concise plan and current iteration step
  • actions_taken: concrete changes made
  • validation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
  • verification: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
  • remaining: top unresolved items or none

For setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.

Load References

  • references/codeql.md
  • references/queries.md
  • references/workflow.md

Example Requests

  • "Set up CodeQL for this public .NET repo."
  • "Explain the CodeQL caveat for private repos."

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.