agentleFS
Postpartum-genushyacinthus29Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/skills/dotnet-complexity/SKILL.md

dotnet-complexity

Skill13 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. Use when a repo needs cyclomatic complexity checks, maintainability thresholds, or complexity-driven refactoring gates.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.

    line 36
  3. Very specific:

    Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.

    line 37
  4. Distinctive:

    Start with the built-in maintainability analyzers before reaching for non-standard tooling.

    line 42
  5. Distinctive:

    Use these rules deliberately:

    line 43
  6. Very specific:

    Keep rule severity in the root .editorconfig.

    line 48
  7. Very specific:

    Keep metric thresholds in a checked-in CodeMetricsConfig.txt added as AdditionalFiles.

    line 49
  8. Distinctive:

    If complexity thresholds are not configured yet:

    line 54
  9. Very specific:

    Add severity entries for CA1502, CA1505, CA1506, and CA1501 in root .editorconfig.

    line 59
  10. Very specific:

    Add checked-in CodeMetricsConfig.txt and include it as AdditionalFiles in project props.

    line 60
  11. Distinctive:

    Keep maintainability limits aligned with AGENTS.md.

    line 61
  12. Very specific:

    Run dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT and return status: configured or status: improved.

    line 62
  13. Very specific:

    If policy relies only on AGENTS.md limits with no analyzer gate by design, return status: not_applicable.

    line 63
  14. Distinctive:

    Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

    line 80
  15. Distinctive:

    write a detailed execution plan

    line 85
  16. Distinctive:

    Update the plan after each iteration.

    line 90
  17. Very specific:

    If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

    line 92

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

.NET Complexity Review

Trigger On

  • the team wants to find overly complex methods
  • cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI
  • maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured

Value

  • produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
  • reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
  • leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

Do Not Use For

  • formatting-only work
  • generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change

Inputs

  • the nearest AGENTS.md
  • current analyzer settings
  • current maintainability limits

Quick Start

  1. Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
  2. Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
  3. Return the Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.

Workflow

  1. Start with the built-in maintainability analyzers before reaching for non-standard tooling.
  2. Use these rules deliberately:
    • CA1502 for excessive cyclomatic complexity in methods
    • CA1505 for low maintainability index
    • CA1506 for excessive class coupling
    • CA1501 when inheritance depth is also part of the design problem
  3. Keep rule severity in the root .editorconfig.
  4. Keep metric thresholds in a checked-in CodeMetricsConfig.txt added as AdditionalFiles.
  5. Pair analyzer findings with MCAF maintainability limits in AGENTS.md.

Bootstrap When Missing

If complexity thresholds are not configured yet:

  1. Detect current state:
    • rg -n "CA1501|CA1502|CA1505|CA1506|CodeMetricsConfig" -g '.editorconfig' -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .
    • rg --files -g 'CodeMetricsConfig.txt'
  2. Add severity entries for CA1502, CA1505, CA1506, and CA1501 in root .editorconfig.
  3. Add checked-in CodeMetricsConfig.txt and include it as AdditionalFiles in project props.
  4. Keep maintainability limits aligned with AGENTS.md.
  5. Run dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT and return status: configured or status: improved.
  6. If policy relies only on AGENTS.md limits with no analyzer gate by design, return status: not_applicable.

Deliver

  • explicit complexity and maintainability policy
  • checked-in metric thresholds
  • CI commands that surface complex methods early

Validate

  • method-complexity checks are enabled where the repo wants them
  • thresholds are versioned in repo, not held in IDE memory
  • complexity findings map to real refactoring decisions

Ralph Loop

Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

  1. Plan first (mandatory):
    • analyze current state
    • define target outcome, constraints, and risks
    • write a detailed execution plan
    • list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
  2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
  3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
  4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
  5. Update the plan after each iteration.
  6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
  7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

Required Result Format

  • status: complete | clean | improved | configured | not_applicable | blocked
  • plan: concise plan and current iteration step
  • actions_taken: concrete changes made
  • validation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
  • verification: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
  • remaining: top unresolved items or none

For setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.

Load References

  • references/complexity.md
  • references/metrics.md
  • references/config.md

Example Requests

  • "Which analyzer finds complex methods in .NET?"
  • "Add a complexity gate for our C# code."
  • "Configure cyclomatic complexity thresholds."

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.