agentleFS
Postpartum-genushyacinthus29Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/skills/dotnet-modern-csharp/SKILL.md

dotnet-modern-csharp

Skill13 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write modern, version-aware C# for .NET repositories. Use when choosing language features across C# versions, especially C# 13 and C# 14, while staying compatible with the repo's target framework and `LangVersion`.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

19 rules. About 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈13

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

    line 22
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.

    line 38
  3. Very specific:

    Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.

    line 39
  4. Distinctive:

    Prefer stable features that the current repo actually supports.

    line 45
  5. Distinctive:

    Use modern syntax when it reduces ceremony, improves correctness, or makes invariants clearer.

    line 46
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not mass-rewrite a codebase into newer syntax unless the repo wants that churn.

    line 47
  7. Distinctive:

    Treat preview features as opt-in only.

    line 48
  8. Distinctive:

    When feature selection changes architecture, style rules, or generated-code patterns, coordinate with:

    line 52
  9. Very specific:

    After feature-driven refactors, run the repo's .NET quality pass through dotnet.

    line 56
  10. Distinctive:

    If the requested C# feature depends on SDK or language support the repo does not have yet:

    line 60
  11. Distinctive:

    If the feature requires a newer supported SDK or target framework, upgrade the repo toolchain deliberately instead of relying on the local …

    line 66
  12. Very specific:

    If the repo needs explicit LangVersion, record it in project or shared MSBuild config.

    line 67
  13. Very specific:

    Run dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT after the feature or toolchain change and return status: configured or status: improved.

    line 68
  14. Very specific:

    If the repo intentionally stays below the required language level, return status: not_applicable.

    line 69
  15. Distinctive:

    no accidental preview or unsupported-language drift

    line 75
  16. Distinctive:

    Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

    line 86
  17. Distinctive:

    write a detailed execution plan

    line 91
  18. Distinctive:

    Update the plan after each iteration.

    line 96
  19. Very specific:

    If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

    line 98

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Modern C# for .NET

Trigger On

  • the repo wants more modern idiomatic C# code
  • a change depends on language-version compatibility
  • the team is upgrading or reviewing C# feature usage across versions
  • you need to know whether a C# 13 or C# 14 feature is safe to use

Value

  • produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
  • reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
  • leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

Do Not Use For

  • non-C# .NET languages such as F# or VB
  • analyzer-only or formatter-only setup with no language feature choice

Inputs

  • target TFM or TFMs
  • explicit LangVersion, if any
  • current SDK version
  • team style rules in .editorconfig and AGENTS.md

Quick Start

  1. Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
  2. Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
  3. Return the Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.

Workflow

  1. Detect the real language ceiling from the repo's target framework and explicit LangVersion.
  2. Prefer stable features that the current repo actually supports.
  3. Use modern syntax when it reduces ceremony, improves correctness, or makes invariants clearer.
  4. Do not mass-rewrite a codebase into newer syntax unless the repo wants that churn.
  5. Treat preview features as opt-in only. Never assume preview because the current machine has a newer SDK.
  6. Pay special attention to C# 13 and C# 14:
    • C# 13 is the stable language for .NET 9
    • C# 14 is the stable language for .NET 10
  7. When feature selection changes architecture, style rules, or generated-code patterns, coordinate with:
    • dotnet
    • dotnet-analyzer-config
    • dotnet-architecture
  8. After feature-driven refactors, run the repo's .NET quality pass through dotnet.

Bootstrap When Missing

If the requested C# feature depends on SDK or language support the repo does not have yet:

  1. Detect current state:
    • dotnet --list-sdks
    • rg -n "TargetFramework|LangVersion|TargetFrameworks" -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .
  2. Confirm whether the repo wants to stay on the current stable language level or intentionally upgrade.
  3. If the feature requires a newer supported SDK or target framework, upgrade the repo toolchain deliberately instead of relying on the local machine by accident.
  4. If the repo needs explicit LangVersion, record it in project or shared MSBuild config.
  5. Run dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT after the feature or toolchain change and return status: configured or status: improved.
  6. If the repo intentionally stays below the required language level, return status: not_applicable.

Deliver

  • modern C# code that fits the repo's real language version
  • fewer obsolete patterns when a newer stable feature is clearer
  • no accidental preview or unsupported-language drift

Validate

  • the chosen syntax is supported by the repo's TFM and LangVersion
  • the feature improves clarity, correctness, or maintainability
  • preview-only features are used only when the repo explicitly opted in
  • style and analyzer rules still agree with the new syntax

Ralph Loop

Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

  1. Plan first (mandatory):
    • analyze current state
    • define target outcome, constraints, and risks
    • write a detailed execution plan
    • list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
  2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
  3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
  4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
  5. Update the plan after each iteration.
  6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
  7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

Required Result Format

  • status: complete | clean | improved | configured | not_applicable | blocked
  • plan: concise plan and current iteration step
  • actions_taken: concrete changes made
  • validation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
  • verification: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
  • remaining: top unresolved items or none

For setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.

Load References

  • references/patterns.md
  • references/migration.md
  • references/csharp-modern-features.md

Example Requests

  • "Make this C# code more modern."
  • "Which features can we use on .NET 9?"
  • "Review this repo for C# 13 or C# 14 opportunities."

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.