dotnet-csharpier
Skill13 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use the open-source free `CSharpier` formatter for C# and XML. Use when a .NET repo intentionally wants one opinionated formatter instead of a highly configurable `dotnet format`-driven style model.
In this repository84 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- dotnet-analyzer-configSkill
- dotnet-architectureSkill
- dotnet-archunitnetSkill
- dotnet-aspireSkill
- dotnet-aspnet-coreSkill
- dotnet-asynkron-profilerSkill
- dotnet-azure-functionsSkill
- dotnet-biomeSkill
- dotnet-blazorSkill
- dotnet-chousSkill
- dotnet-clocSkill
- dotnet-code-analysisSkill
- dotnet-codeqlSkill
- dotnet-code-reviewSkill
- dotnet-complexitySkill
- dotnet-coverletSkill
- dotnet-entity-framework6Skill
- dotnet-entity-framework-coreSkill
- dotnet-eslintSkill
- dotnet-formatSkill
- dotnet-grpcSkill
- dotnet-htmlhintSkill
- dotnet-legacy-aspnetSkill
- dotnet-libvlcSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-communicationSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-markitdownSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-mimetypesSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-orleans-graphSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-orleans-signalrSkill
- dotnet-managedcode-storageSkill
- dotnet-mauiSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-agile-deliverySkill
- dotnet-mcaf-devexSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-documentationSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-feature-specSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planningSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-ml-ai-deliverySkill
- dotnet-mcaf-nfrSkill
- dotnet-mcafSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-source-controlSkill
- dotnet-mcaf-ui-uxSkill
- dotnet-mcpSkill
- dotnet-metalintSkill
- dotnet-meziantou-analyzerSkill
- dotnet-microsoft-agent-frameworkSkill
- dotnet-microsoft-extensions-aiSkill
- dotnet-microsoft-extensionsSkill
- dotnet-minimal-apisSkill
- dotnet-mixed-realitySkill
- dotnet-mlnetSkill
- dotnet-modern-csharpSkill
- dotnet-mstestSkill
- dotnet-mvvmSkill
- dotnet-netarchtestSkill
- dotnet-nunitSkill
- dotnet-orleansSkill
- dotnet-profilingSkill
- dotnet-project-setupSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
- Distinctive: line 34
Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
- Very specific: line 35
Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
- Very specific: line 41
Use check mode in CI.
- Distinctive: line 42
Keep ignore files and config explicit in repo.
- Very specific: line 43
Do not let CSharpier and dotnet format both own the same formatting space without documentation.
- Very specific: line 47
If CSharpier is not configured yet:
- Distinctive: line 53
Prefer local tool installation for reproducible CI:
- Very specific: line 56
Add .csharpierignore when needed and define ownership vs dotnet format in AGENTS.md.
- Very specific: line 57
Add dotnet csharpier check .
- Very specific: line 58
Run dotnet csharpier check .
- Very specific: line 59
If the repo intentionally uses only dotnet format, return status: not_applicable unless migration is requested.
- Distinctive: line 74
Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
- Distinctive: line 79
write a detailed execution plan
- Distinctive: line 84
Update the plan after each iteration.
- Very specific: line 86
If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CSharpier for .NET
Trigger On
- the repo uses or wants
CSharpier - the team prefers an opinionated formatter over many configurable style knobs
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- repos that already standardized on
dotnet formatas the only formatter
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md - current formatting ownership model
- any
.csharpierignoreor.editorconfig
Quick Start
- Read the nearest
AGENTS.mdand confirm scope and constraints. - Run this skill's
Workflowthrough theRalph Loopuntil outcomes are acceptable. - Return the
Required Result Formatwith concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
- Decide whether CSharpier is the primary formatter or only complements other tools.
- Use
checkmode in CI. - Keep ignore files and config explicit in repo.
- Do not let
CSharpieranddotnet formatboth own the same formatting space without documentation.
Bootstrap When Missing
If CSharpier is not configured yet:
- Detect current state:
rg --files -g '.config/dotnet-tools.json' -g '.csharpierignore'dotnet tool list --localdotnet tool list --global
- Prefer local tool installation for reproducible CI:
dotnet new tool-manifest(if missing)dotnet tool install csharpier
- Add
.csharpierignorewhen needed and define ownership vsdotnet formatinAGENTS.md. - Add
dotnet csharpier check .to CI. - Run
dotnet csharpier check .and returnstatus: configuredorstatus: improved. - If the repo intentionally uses only
dotnet format, returnstatus: not_applicableunless migration is requested.
Deliver
- explicit CSharpier ownership and commands
- CI-safe formatter checks
Validate
- formatter ownership is not ambiguous
- the repo is comfortable with opinionated formatting decisions
Ralph Loop
Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
- Plan first (mandatory):
- analyze current state
- define target outcome, constraints, and risks
- write a detailed execution plan
- list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
- Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
- Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
- Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
- Update the plan after each iteration.
- Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
- If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return
status: not_applicablewith explicit reason and fallback path.
Required Result Format
status:complete|clean|improved|configured|not_applicable|blockedplan: concise plan and current iteration stepactions_taken: concrete changes madevalidation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasonsverification: commands, checks, or review evidence summaryremaining: top unresolved items ornone
For setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.
Load References
references/commands.mdreferences/config.mdreferences/csharpier.md
Example Requests
- "Set up CSharpier for this repo."
- "Compare CSharpier and dotnet format."
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

