seven-habits
Skill0 starsChanged 47 days agoMITView on GitHub
当用户的一个长期个人效能问题卡住时调用:被环境拖着走、人生方向不清、时间被琐事吞没、人际关系紧张或冲突、沟通听不进去、陷入二选一僵局、长期透支与倦怠、想修复一段被消耗的关系。覆盖《高效能人士的七个习惯》(史蒂芬·柯维) 的全部方法论:由内而外与思维方式转换、成熟模式图与 P/PC 效能、积极主动与影响圈、以终为始与使命宣言、要事第一与四象限、情感账户、双赢思维、移情聆听、统合综效与第三条道路、四层面自我更新、代际转型者。不适用于:临床心理治疗与精神疾病、正在发生的安全危机、法律与财务的专业处置(it is a self-leadership toolkit, not therapy or professional advice)。
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- automate-boring-stuffSkill
- a-year-rebirthSkill
- cognitive-driveSkill
- computationSkill
- counseling-for-toadsSkill
- courage-to-be-dislikedSkill
- deliberate-practiceSkill
- elite-time-controlSkill
- goodbye-sapiensSkill
- how-to-read-a-bookSkill
- intellectual-modernSkill
- let-time-make-you-richSkill
- myth-of-sisyphusSkill
- naval-almanackSkill
- nonviolent-communicationSkill
- one-thing-in-lifeSkill
- poor-charlies-almanackSkill
- python-crash-courseSkill
- python-quick-referenceSkill
- settle-yourselfSkill
- siddharthaSkill
- social-psychologySkill
- thinking-fast-and-slowSkill
- underlying-logicSkill
The file
Files
《高效能人士的七个习惯:30周年纪念版》 — 全书能力入口
触发与不触发
适用:与本书能力域相关的咨询与任务(见下方路由表的意图列)。 不适用:
- 临床心理治疗、精神疾病诊断与用药;出现自伤或伤人风险、持续两周以上低情绪等指征时应建议就医。
- 正在发生的暴力、人身安全危机与灾难现场(先确保安全并联系专业机构)。
- 法律争议、劳动争议、财务与投资的正式专业处置。
- 把本书当作评判他人或要求他人改变的工具(它是自我修炼的方法,不是改造别人的杠杆)。
核心原则(常驻速览,概览类问题读到这里即可回答)
- 由内而外:改变从思维方式与品德开始,技巧只居次要——先检查地图,再换做法。
- 效能是产出(金蛋)与产能(鹅)的平衡——任何取舍先问:这件事在消耗还是在养护长期能力?
- 习惯 = 知识 + 技巧 + 意愿(做什么 / 如何做 / 想要做),三者缺一不可。
- 次序不可颠倒:个人领域(习惯一至三)先于公众领域(习惯四至六);依赖 → 独立 → 互赖,只有独立的人才能选择互赖。
- 刺激与回应之间存在距离:把资源投向影响圈与第二象限,而不是关注圈与紧急之事。
- 公众领域的两条硬规则:先理解对方再求被理解;不能双赢就好聚好散。
- 改变是螺旋不是一次顿悟:四层面(身体/精神/智力/社会情感)的持续更新是其余一切习惯的产能保障。
能力路由(先读本表,按意图加载 1 张能力卡)
| 用户意图 | 先读 | 补读/备注 |
| 同样的困境反复出现,想检查是不是「对问题的看法」错了;关系困局中在等对方先改变,想把改变从自己开始;反复用新技巧「扑火」失效,想分清技巧与品德/范式的轻重 | references/capabilities/inside-out.md | references/capabilities/seven-habits-overview.md、references/capabilities/be-proactive.md、references/capabilities/sharpen-the-saw.md |
| 给一个纠结的取舍做「短期 vs 长期」体检(金蛋还是鹅);给自己或团队定位七个习惯的修炼次序(依赖/独立/互赖);「知道却做不到」时定位知识/技巧/意愿的缺口 | references/capabilities/seven-habits-overview.md | references/capabilities/inside-out.md、references/capabilities/put-first-things-first.md、references/capabilities/sharpen-the-saw.md、references/capabilities/reading-and-index.md |
| 把「他/环境让我……」「我不得不」的叙事改写为「我选择……」;分清这件事落在影响圈还是关注圈,找到第一步行动;为情绪反应或已无法挽回的错误,找一个负责任的回应方式 | references/capabilities/be-proactive.md | references/capabilities/inside-out.md、references/capabilities/put-first-things-first.md、references/capabilities/transition-person.md |
| 为人生、家庭或事业确定方向、撰写使命宣言;重大取舍前确认「这是不是我要的终点」;弥补「忙碌却空虚」的方向缺失,把口号式的愿景落到具体取舍 | references/capabilities/begin-with-the-end-in-mind.md | references/capabilities/life-center.md、references/capabilities/leadership-vs-management.md、references/capabilities/put-first-things-first.md、references/capabilities/transition-person.md |
| 弄清自己的生活重心、情绪与安全感被什么牵着走;重大抉择前检查自己的决策依据是否被某个中心劫持;在各类生活中心与以原则为中心之间做自检与转换 | references/capabilities/life-center.md | references/capabilities/begin-with-the-end-in-mind.md |
| 判断自己或团队是在做正确的事,还是只把事做对;战略与执行、掌舵与划桨之间摇摆时确定该抓哪一头;组织或家庭的变革讨论只有流程没有方向时定位问题 | references/capabilities/leadership-vs-management.md | references/capabilities/begin-with-the-end-in-mind.md、references/capabilities/put-first-things-first.md |
| 事情太多做不完,想理清优先级与时间去向(四象限诊断);想做一份以要事为中心的周计划,并能每日调整;总被紧急事务牵着走,想学会对「不错」的事说「不」;怀疑自己缺自制力,想让计划真正执行下去 | references/capabilities/put-first-things-first.md | references/capabilities/seven-habits-overview.md、references/capabilities/be-proactive.md、references/capabilities/begin-with-the-end-in-mind.md、references/capabilities/leadership-vs-management.md、references/capabilities/responsible-delegation.md |
| 想把工作或家务交给他人,却总不放心、反复检查;团队里所有事都堆在自己身上,成员没有成长;交办后对方反复请示细节,或结果不符合预期;想给下属或孩子成长空间,又怕放手后出问题 | references/capabilities/responsible-delegation.md | references/capabilities/put-first-things-first.md、references/capabilities/think-win-win.md |
| 与伴侣/孩子/同事的关系变冷或信任透支,想修复却不知从何下手;想为重要关系做日常维护,而不是等出问题才想起修补;亲子沟通只剩提醒与指令,孩子不再交心;想知道哪些行为在消耗信任、哪些在积累 | references/capabilities/emotional-bank-account.md | references/capabilities/think-win-win.md、references/capabilities/seek-first-to-understand.md |
| 判断一段合作或谈判是不是真的双赢(含伪双赢自检);各方立场僵持时诊断该修哪一环条件(关系/协议/体系/过程);合伙或签约前设计协议五要素与退出机制 | references/capabilities/think-win-win.md | references/capabilities/responsible-delegation.md、references/capabilities/emotional-bank-account.md、references/capabilities/seek-first-to-understand.md、references/capabilities/synergize.md |
| 对方不愿沟通或一说就沉默时恢复对话;说服上级、客户或家人前先提高可信度与通过率;给建议前确认自己是否真正理解了对方 | references/capabilities/seek-first-to-understand.md | references/capabilities/emotional-bank-account.md、references/capabilities/think-win-win.md、references/capabilities/synergize.md |
| 双方方案僵持时创造第三条道路;会议只剩折中或妥协时如何升级;推动改变遇阻力时化阻力为动力 | references/capabilities/synergize.md | references/capabilities/think-win-win.md、references/capabilities/seek-first-to-understand.md |
| 长期忙碌、锻炼与阅读被挤掉,想知道该从哪一层开始恢复;为身体/精神/智力/社会·情感四个层面安排可执行的更新计划;识别只忙产出、不保养产能的失衡(含四层面偏废) | references/capabilities/sharpen-the-saw.md | references/capabilities/inside-out.md、references/capabilities/seven-habits-overview.md |
| 发现自己重复父母的某种行为模式,想在自己这里改变;与伴侣/家人做深度交流,但一碰敏感话题就受伤;理解家人对某件小事的异常执着背后是什么 | references/capabilities/transition-person.md | references/capabilities/be-proactive.md、references/capabilities/begin-with-the-end-in-mind.md |
| 读完材料记不住,想要能留住的学习方法;遇到具体困境,想知道书里哪一章对症;建立「读→用」的循环,而不是浅尝辄止 | references/capabilities/reading-and-index.md | references/capabilities/seven-habits-overview.md |
非能力类查询:
- 书名/作者/章节/整书概览 → references/overview.md
- 术语解释 → references/glossary.md
- 决策规则速查(不需要原文依据时) → references/cheatsheet.md
- 完整意图与关键词索引(本表未覆盖的意图先查这里) → references/capability-index.md
加载规则
- 每次任务先读本文件,再按路由表加载 1 张能力卡;任务明确跨域时最多加载 2 张。
- 概览/书名类问题不加载能力卡,用「核心原则」与 overview.md 回答。
- 路由表与 capability-index.md 都无法命中的意图,明确告知超出本书范围,不要硬套。
边界与判停
- 用户要求用「积极主动/影响圈」要求某人(或自己)为结构性不公、受害经历承担全部责任时,停止,并说明该框架的边界(受害者有罪论风险)。
- 用户把「双赢/统合综效」用作劝对方让步的话术,或为已发生的操控、报复、惩罚行为寻找正当性时,停止,回到「先修条件(品德/关系/体系)再谈方案」的纪律。
- 涉及具体健康数据(心率、训练处方、饮食)时只保留原书表述,不得扩展为医学建议;用户寻求医疗建议时转专业渠道。
- 用户处于急性情绪危机(惊恐发作、自杀意念等)时,停止方法论练习,先建议寻求紧急支持(如心理热线或就近就医)。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

