nonviolent-communication
Skill0 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub
当用户想改善一段具体的人际沟通时调用:表达自己却不引发争吵、听到批评而不反击、面对情绪激动的人、处理自己的愤怒与自责、判断该不该用惩罚或强制。 覆盖《非暴力沟通》(马歇尔·卢森堡) 的全部方法论:观察与评论的区分、感受与想法的区分、从感受反推需要、请求与命令的划界、四要素倾听、充分表达愤怒、自我同理与自我宽恕、用「选择做」代替「不得不」、防卫性强制力与惩罚的判别、表达与接受感激、内心冲突、异化沟通自查。 不适用于: 临床心理治疗与精神疾病诊断、正在发生的暴力或人身安全危机、法律与劳动争议的专业处置。
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- automate-boring-stuffSkill
- a-year-rebirthSkill
- cognitive-driveSkill
- computationSkill
- counseling-for-toadsSkill
- courage-to-be-dislikedSkill
- deliberate-practiceSkill
- elite-time-controlSkill
- goodbye-sapiensSkill
- how-to-read-a-bookSkill
- intellectual-modernSkill
- let-time-make-you-richSkill
- myth-of-sisyphusSkill
- naval-almanackSkill
- one-thing-in-lifeSkill
- poor-charlies-almanackSkill
- python-crash-courseSkill
- python-quick-referenceSkill
- settle-yourselfSkill
- seven-habitsSkill
- siddharthaSkill
- social-psychologySkill
- thinking-fast-and-slowSkill
- underlying-logicSkill
The file
Files
《非暴力沟通》 — 全书能力入口
触发与不触发
适用:与本书能力域相关的咨询与任务(见下方路由表的意图列)。 不适用:
- 临床心理治疗、精神疾病诊断与用药(本方法不替代医疗)
- 正在发生的家庭暴力、人身安全危机(先确保安全并联系专业机构)
- 法律争议、劳动争议、合同与赔偿的专业处置
核心原则(常驻速览,概览类问题读到这里即可回答)
- 四要素是全书的共同语法:观察 → 感受 → 需要 → 请求。表达与倾听用的是同一套要素,方向相反。
- 对方反驳的通常不是事实,而是裹在事实外面的那层评论——所以第一步是把评价从观察里剥出来。
- 情绪的根在需要:某种情绪反复出现,是因为某个需要在反复未被满足;找到需要才有出口。
- 请求必须正向、具体、可拒绝;一旦对方感到「不答应就有代价」,它就已经变成了命令。
- 倾听是把对方没说完的话替他说出来,而不是给建议、安慰或分析——十项妨碍行为里最常被误用的恰恰是「询问」。
- 生气时先停下来:找到脑子里那句点火的话,再把那句话翻译成需要。
- 强制力只可用于防卫(阻止正在发生的伤害),不可用于惩罚(让人长记性)——两者的分界线是意图,不是力度。
能力路由(先读本表,按意图加载 1 张能力卡)
| 用户意图 | 先读 | 补读/备注 |
| 说出的话被当成指责;想指出问题又不想吵起来;听到批评只想立刻反击 | references/capabilities/observation-vs-evaluation.md | references/capabilities/feelings-vs-thoughts.md、references/capabilities/four-part-expression.md |
| 只知道自己难受,说不出想要什么;同一种情绪反复出现找不到原因;听到难听的话之后无法自处 | references/capabilities/feelings-to-needs.md | references/capabilities/self-empathy.md、references/capabilities/expressing-anger.md、references/capabilities/inner-conflict.md |
| 提了要求对方却觉得被命令;想让对方改变但一开口就吵;对方嘴上答应实际做不到 | references/capabilities/requests-vs-demands.md | references/capabilities/empathic-listening.md、references/capabilities/protective-force.md、references/capabilities/four-part-expression.md |
| 对方情绪激动、发火,我越劝越糟;想帮忙却被说「你根本不懂」;对方拒绝或沉默时,我不知道该说什么、只能干着急 | references/capabilities/empathic-listening.md | references/capabilities/feelings-to-needs.md、references/capabilities/self-empathy.md、references/capabilities/expressing-anger.md |
| 很生气,既不想伤人也憋不住;一生气就说狠话,事后后悔;被激怒后想发作又忍住 | references/capabilities/expressing-anger.md | references/capabilities/feelings-to-needs.md、references/capabilities/empathic-listening.md、references/capabilities/protective-force.md |
| 一直在自责,走不出来;做错事之后反复折磨自己;对自己比对别人还苛刻 | references/capabilities/self-empathy.md | references/capabilities/feelings-to-needs.md、references/capabilities/inner-conflict.md、references/capabilities/choosing-over-have-to.md |
| 孩子打人,该不该罚;想用强制手段阻止对方继续;分不清管教和惩罚的界线 | references/capabilities/protective-force.md | references/capabilities/requests-vs-demands.md、references/capabilities/expressing-anger.md |
| 一开口就吵起来;想好好表达但不知道从何说起;想学非暴力沟通的完整框架 | references/capabilities/four-part-expression.md | references/capabilities/observation-vs-evaluation.md、references/capabilities/feelings-vs-thoughts.md、references/capabilities/feelings-to-needs.md、references/capabilities/requests-vs-demands.md |
| 说自己的感受,却被当成在指责;分不清自己在说感受还是在下判断;被问什么感受时说不出来,只能用「还行」「挺烦的」应付 | references/capabilities/feelings-vs-thoughts.md | references/capabilities/observation-vs-evaluation.md、references/capabilities/feelings-to-needs.md |
| 总觉得被生活逼着走;做事没有动力,又不敢停下来 | references/capabilities/choosing-over-have-to.md | references/capabilities/self-empathy.md |
| 想表达感谢但一开口就变成客套话(「您辛苦了」「你真好」);夸奖别人听起来很客套;收到夸奖不知道怎么接 | references/capabilities/expressing-gratitude.md | references/capabilities/observation-vs-evaluation.md |
| 心里有两个声音在吵;情绪持续低落、提不起劲,说不清原因(夹着做也不对、不做也不对的拧巴感);两难夹着自责(如「我不是个好妈妈」——自责背后站着另一个方向的声音) | references/capabilities/inner-conflict.md | references/capabilities/self-empathy.md、references/capabilities/feelings-to-needs.md |
| 想让别人按我的想法做;总觉得问题都在别人身上;说话容易得罪人却不知道为什么 | references/capabilities/alienating-self-check.md | references/capabilities/observation-vs-evaluation.md、references/capabilities/requests-vs-demands.md、references/capabilities/choosing-over-have-to.md |
非能力类查询:
- 书名/作者/章节/整书概览 → references/overview.md
- 术语解释 → references/glossary.md
- 决策规则速查(不需要原文依据时) → references/cheatsheet.md
- 完整意图与关键词索引(本表未覆盖的意图先查这里) → references/capability-index.md
加载规则
- 每次任务先读本文件,再按路由表加载 1 张能力卡;任务明确跨域时最多加载 2 张。
- 概览/书名类问题不加载能力卡,用「核心原则」与 overview.md 回答。
- 路由表与 capability-index.md 都无法命中的意图,明确告知超出本书范围,不要硬套。
边界与判停
- 用户描述正在发生的暴力或人身安全威胁时,停止本流程,先建议确保安全并求助专业机构。
- 出现自伤或伤人风险、或持续两周以上的低情绪等临床抑郁指征时,停止并建议就医。
- 用户要求为已经发生的体罚、羞辱或报复行为寻找正当理由时,停止,并明确区分防卫性强制力与惩罚性强制力。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

