content-marketing
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Creates long-form marketing content that educates and converts — blog posts, tutorials, newsletters, case studies, and landing copy. Use when you need articles, guides, launch posts, or email content that drives developer engagement and sign-ups.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- m-binimran/marketing-packtheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- YepAPI/skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 12, 2026
- busyeugene/content-marketing-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 12, 2026
- docaohieu2808/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 9, 2026
- OpenAnalystInc/10x-Teamtheir own version, first seen Mar 9, 2026
- vivy-yi/xiaohongshu-skillstheir own version, first seen Jan 22, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- vivy-yi/xiaohongshu-skills★ 455same name
- OpenAnalystInc/10x-Team★ 8same name
- YepAPI/skills★ 8same name
- busyeugene/content-marketing-skills★ 1same name
- m-binimran/marketing-pack★ 1same name
- docaohieu2808/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository68 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/engineering-skills.mdcCursor rule
- marketing-routerSkill
- accessibilitySkill
- agent-guardrailsSkill
- agent-memorySkill
- agent-verificationSkill
- autonomous-loopsSkill
- browser-checksSkill
- caching-strategySkill
- context-curationSkill
- contract-testingSkill
- data-modelingSkill
- decision-docsSkill
- dependency-hygieneSkill
- design-handoffSkill
- e2e-testingSkill
- experimentationSkill
- fault-recoverySkill
- feature-flagsSkill
- finops-budgetSkill
- git-flowSkill
- hardeningSkill
- i18n-l10nSkill
- idea-shapingSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- incremental-deliverySkill
- interface-designSkill
- launch-campaignSkill
- launch-readinessSkill
- llm-feature-engineeringSkill
- long-running-agentsSkill
- community-engagementSkill
- email-nurtureSkill
- growth-strategySkill
- paid-adsSkill
- referral-loopSkill
- seo-growthSkill
- social-distributionSkill
- micro-interactionsSkill
- migration-pathSkill
- mobile-patternsSkill
- observabilitySkill
- orchestrated-deliverySkill
- parallel-subagentsSkill
- perf-budgetSkill
- pipeline-opsSkill
- product-briefSkill
- product-discoverySkill
- product-groomingSkill
- react-patternsSkill
- resilienceSkill
- review-gateSkill
- simplifySkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-harvestSkill
- skill-routerSkill
- source-firstSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 40
If the topic doesn't serve the ICP or a message pillar, reject or reframe it.
- Distinctive: line 114
No concrete examples, steps, or screenshots
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Content Marketing
Developers trust useful content, not ad copy. This skill produces long-form pieces that teach something real, demonstrate the product honestly, and end with a clear next step. Content compounds — a good tutorial ranks for months; a generic promo dies in hours.
Chains from [[growth-strategy]] (brief, pillars, ICP) and feeds [[social-distribution]] (snippets), [[seo-growth]] (optimized pages), and [[community-engagement]] (discussion starters).
When to Use
- Writing a launch blog post or product announcement
- Creating tutorials, guides, or "how to" articles
- Drafting newsletter editions or email sequences
- Producing case studies or user success stories
- Writing landing page copy (hero, features, FAQ)
- Repurposing one pillar into multiple formats
Skip for short social posts only — use [[social-distribution]] instead.
Process
1. Start from the brief
Load inputs from [[growth-strategy]] or gather:
- Topic / working title
- Target reader (ICP persona)
- Goal — educate, convert, retain, announce
- Primary keyword (if SEO matters)
- Message pillar this piece supports
- CTA — sign up, try feature, join community, read docs
- Format — blog (800–2000 words), tutorial (step-by-step), case study, newsletter
If the topic doesn't serve the ICP or a message pillar, reject or reframe it.
2. Outline before writing
Structure every piece:
Hook — specific pain or surprising stat (2–3 sentences)
Problem — why this matters to the reader
Insight — your angle (not generic advice)
Solution / walkthrough — steps, examples, screenshots placeholders
Product tie-in — natural, ≤20% of piece; show don't pitch
Proof — data, quote, mini case, or demo
CTA — one clear actionFor tutorials: numbered steps, code/commands where relevant, expected outcome per step.
3. Write for developers
Rules:
- Lead with value — reader learns something even if they never sign up
- Be specific — "connect with 3 mentors in your stack" beats "grow your network"
- Show the product — describe what happens on screen; mark
[SCREENSHOT]or[GIF]placeholders - No fluff — cut "in today's fast-paced world" and empty superlatives
- Honest scope — say what the product doesn't do yet
- Scannable — H2/H3, bullets, short paragraphs, code blocks where useful
Voice: peer explaining something useful, not a brand shouting.
4. Optimize for engagement and conversion
- Title — benefit or curiosity; include keyword if SEO piece
- Meta description — 150–160 chars, includes CTA verb
- First 100 words — hook + promise of what they'll get
- Internal links — related posts, docs, sign-up page
- One primary CTA — repeated once mid-article and once at end max
- Social snippets — draft 3 pull quotes or thread bullets for [[social-distribution]]
5. Repurpose plan
From one article, extract:
| Asset | Format | Channel |
| Thread | 5–8 tweets | X |
| Carousel outline | 5 slides | |
| Reddit post | Problem + link | Subreddit (value-first) |
| Newsletter blurb | 2 paragraphs | |
| Community question | Discussion prompt | Discord / forum |
List these in the deliverable even if another agent publishes them.
6. Review before publish
Self-check:
- Would I share this if I didn't work on the product?
- Every claim is true or marked
[VERIFY] - CTA matches the campaign goal
- No jargon without explanation
- Screenshots/demo placeholders noted
Common Rationalizations
- "SEO will fix a weak article" — Thin content doesn't rank or convert. Quality first.
- "The whole post should be about our product" — 80% value, 20% product. Invert and readers bounce.
- "We need more posts, not better posts" — One strong tutorial beats five announcements.
- "Developers read long docs" — They read long useful docs. Cut everything else.
Red Flags
- Title promises what the body doesn't deliver
- No concrete examples, steps, or screenshots
- CTA missing or buried
- Reads like a press release
- Copied from a competitor with names swapped
[VERIFY]tags left in published copy
Verification
Content is done when:
- Outline matches brief (ICP, pillar, goal, CTA)
- Full draft with hook, problem, insight, solution, proof, CTA
- Title + meta description written
- 3 social snippets / pull quotes for repurposing
- Repurpose table filled (thread, LinkedIn, Reddit, newsletter)
- Self-review checklist passed; claims verified or flagged
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

