agentleFS
vindreshsinghvindreshsingh/engineering-skills/AGENTS.md

engineering-skills

AGENTS.md0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Guidance for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, and others) working in a project that uses these engineering skills. This repository is a set of skills — step-by-step engineering processes in skills/<name>/SKILL.md. The operating principle is simple: when a task matches a skill, load that skill and follow it fully, rather than improvising a weaker version of a process that already exists. - Guardrails always on — load skills/agent-guardrails/SKILL.md at session start. Never run destructive data operations, read secrets…

  • Reads credentials

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If a task matches a skill, use it.

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Follow the skill's steps and verification completely — partial application loses most of the value.

    line 18
  3. Very specific:

    Verify a web change → browser-checks

    line 34
  4. Very specific:

    Not sure which applies → skill-router (the routing meta-skill)

    line 48

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md

Guidance for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, and others) working in a project that uses these engineering skills.

The model

This repository is a set of skills — step-by-step engineering processes in skills/<name>/SKILL.md. The operating principle is simple: when a task matches a skill, load that skill and follow it fully, rather than improvising a weaker version of a process that already exists.

Core rules:

  • Guardrails always on — load skills/agent-guardrails/SKILL.md at session start. Never run destructive data operations, read secrets from .env/config, or break security controls without explicit user approval. See references/agent-guardrails-checklist.md.
  • If a task matches a skill, use it.
  • Follow the skill's steps and verification completely — partial application loses most of the value.
  • Load the skill relevant to the current step; don't pull in all of them at once.
  • Skills chain: finishing one phase points you to the next.

Routing intent to a skill

Map what the user is asking for to a skill:

  • New feature / functionality → spec-first → work-planning → incremental-delivery + test-first
  • Vague idea to refine → idea-shaping
  • PRD or technical RFC → product-brief
  • Bug / failure / unexpected behavior → fault-recovery
  • Code review → review-gate
  • Refactor / cleanup → simplify
  • API / module / schema boundary → interface-design
  • UI work → ui-craft; motion / click feedback / view transitions → micro-interactions; accessibility → accessibility; design to code → design-handoff; React/Next perf → react-patterns
  • Verify a web change → browser-checks
  • Security / untrusted input / auth → hardening
  • Something slow → perf-budget; caching → caching-strategy
  • Failure handling (timeouts, retries, idempotency) → resilience
  • Database schema / queries → data-modeling
  • Building an AI/LLM feature → llm-feature-engineering
  • Adding / upgrading dependencies → dependency-hygiene; upgrading a specific package (research breaking changes) → version-upgrade
  • Writing or improving a skill in this repo → skill-creator
  • Logging, metrics, tracing, alerts → observability
  • A production outage / postmortem → incident-response
  • Git work → git-flow; CI/CD → pipeline-ops
  • Changing something others depend on → migration-path
  • Decisions / docs → decision-docs
  • Shipping to production → launch-readiness
  • Not sure which applies → skill-router (the routing meta-skill)
  • Backlog grooming / refinement before sprint → product-grooming
  • E2E / browser user journey tests → e2e-testing
  • Internationalization / locales / RTL → i18n-l10n
  • Mobile app (RN, Flutter, native) → mobile-patterns
  • UX flows before UI build → ux-design
  • README, API docs, runbooks → technical-writing
  • Product launch / go-to-market → marketing/SKILL.md (router) → skills/marketing/growth-strategy
  • SEO / page ranking / organic traffic → skills/marketing/seo-growth
  • Community engagement / user retention → skills/marketing/community-engagement
  • Marketing plan / social content / blogs → see marketing/README.md and agents/marketing/

Lifecycle

Most non-trivial work moves through phases — don't jump straight to code:

Define → Plan → Build → Verify → Review → Ship → Operate → Grow

Agents and references

  • agents/ — SDLC personas in agents/sdlc/; marketing in agents/marketing/. See docs/agent-org.md, agents/sdlc/README.md, and marketing/README.md.
  • prompts/ — shared instructions for how personas load and follow skills.
  • references/ — checklists (testing, performance, security, accessibility) to use with the matching skill.

For other tools

The skills are plain Markdown and tool-agnostic. This repo ships the entry-point file each major agent reads, all pointing here:

  • Claude Code — .claude-plugin/ + CLAUDE.md
  • Gemini CLI — GEMINI.md
  • Cursor — .cursor/rules/engineering-skills.mdc
  • GitHub Copilot — .github/copilot-instructions.md
  • Codex / OpenCode / Factory / others — this AGENTS.md (read natively)

Per-tool install and usage: docs/platforms.md. General guide: docs/getting-started.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.