e2e-testing
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Writes and runs end-to-end tests that prove critical user flows work in a real browser. Use when unit tests pass but user journeys need verification, before release of UI flows, or when regressions happen only in full-stack integration.
92 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- op3616windows/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lien0219/openxflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Lukk17/agent-standardstheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemontheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Cure-Consulting-Group/ProductEngineeringSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use everything-claude-code, investor-materials and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
InfopibeSkilleverything-claude-code
Also in 10 projects that use this
InfopibeSkillinvestor-materials
Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.
Also in 28 projects that use this
mryeastcodeSkilleverything-claude-code-conventions
Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.
Also in 8 projects that use this
tpavanipradeepSkillbun-runtime
Bun as runtime, package manager, bundler, and test runner. When to choose Bun vs Node, migration notes, and Vercel support.
Also in 18 projects that use this
niloykumarbarmanSkillagent-sort
Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.
Also in 8 projects that use this
niloykumarbarmanSkillproduct-capability
Translate PRD intent, roadmap asks, or product discussions into an implementation-ready capability plan that exposes constraints, invariants, interfaces, and unresolved decisions before multi-service work starts. Use when the user needs an ECC-native PRD-to-SRS lane instead of vague planning prose.
Also in 9 projects that use this
- +1 more from Infopibe
Other versions92 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 92
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246ksame name
- langflow-ai/langflow★ 156ksame name
- All-Hands-AI/OpenHands★ 93ksame name
- OpenHands/OpenHands★ 93ksame name
- pulsejet/memories★ 3.9ksame name
- xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh★ 1.9ksame name
- paradigmxyz/centaur★ 1.4ksame name
- etewiah/property_web_builder★ 644same name
- nodetool-ai/nodetool★ 615same name
- Opentrons/opentrons★ 532same name
82 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository68 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/engineering-skills.mdcCursor rule
- marketing-routerSkill
- accessibilitySkill
- agent-guardrailsSkill
- agent-memorySkill
- agent-verificationSkill
- autonomous-loopsSkill
- browser-checksSkill
- caching-strategySkill
- context-curationSkill
- contract-testingSkill
- data-modelingSkill
- decision-docsSkill
- dependency-hygieneSkill
- design-handoffSkill
- experimentationSkill
- fault-recoverySkill
- feature-flagsSkill
- finops-budgetSkill
- git-flowSkill
- hardeningSkill
- i18n-l10nSkill
- idea-shapingSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- incremental-deliverySkill
- interface-designSkill
- launch-campaignSkill
- launch-readinessSkill
- llm-feature-engineeringSkill
- long-running-agentsSkill
- community-engagementSkill
- content-marketingSkill
- email-nurtureSkill
- growth-strategySkill
- paid-adsSkill
- referral-loopSkill
- seo-growthSkill
- social-distributionSkill
- micro-interactionsSkill
- migration-pathSkill
- mobile-patternsSkill
- observabilitySkill
- orchestrated-deliverySkill
- parallel-subagentsSkill
- perf-budgetSkill
- pipeline-opsSkill
- product-briefSkill
- product-discoverySkill
- product-groomingSkill
- react-patternsSkill
- resilienceSkill
- review-gateSkill
- simplifySkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-harvestSkill
- skill-routerSkill
- source-firstSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 40 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Use the e2e testing checklist alongside this process.
- Distinctive: line 22
Before release of a new UI flow
- Distinctive: line 23
After refactor touching routing, auth, or API integration
- Distinctive: line 40
Start with 3–5 P0 flows max — flaky huge suites get ignored.
- Distinctive: line 66
Run against staging or local with test DB — never prod
- Distinctive: line 86
Run P0 smoke on PR (allow 5–10 min budget)
- Distinctive: line 95
Update tests when intentional UI change — same PR as code
- Distinctive: line 110
No test for the primary revenue or signup path
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 40 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
E2E Testing
Unit tests prove functions work; E2E tests prove users can complete journeys. A checkout flow, login, or "first connection" path that only works in isolation is not shippable — exercise it in a real browser against a running app.
Pairs with [[test-first]] for unit/integration layers, [[browser-checks]] for manual/exploratory verification, [[spec-first]] for scenarios to automate, [[pipeline-ops]] to run E2E in CI, and [[launch-readiness]] before promoting to production.
Use the e2e testing checklist alongside this process.
When to Use
- Critical user journey must not break (auth, signup, payment, core feature path)
- Bug only reproduces full-stack or in browser
- Before release of a new UI flow
- After refactor touching routing, auth, or API integration
- Replacing manual regression with automated smoke suite
Skip for pure backend/API changes with no user journey impact — use [[test-first]] only.
Process
1. Pick flows — not every screen
Prioritize by risk and frequency:
| Tier | Examples | E2E depth |
| P0 smoke | Login, signup, core happy path | Every PR / nightly |
| P1 | Settings, secondary flows | Nightly |
| P2 | Edge cases, admin | Weekly or pre-release |
Start with 3–5 P0 flows max — flaky huge suites get ignored.
2. Write scenarios from spec
Each test = one user goal from [[spec-first]] acceptance criteria:
Given [starting state]
When [user actions]
Then [observable outcome]One behavior per test. Name tests after the user outcome, not the selector.
3. Choose stack and conventions
Pick one and stick to it:
- Playwright — recommended for modern web (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
- Cypress — good DX for React apps
Conventions:
data-testidfor stable selectors — avoid CSS classes and nth-child- Page object or fixture pattern when flows share steps
- Seed test data via API or factory — don't depend on prod data
- Run against staging or local with test DB — never prod
4. Implement — arrange, act, assert
1. Arrange — seed user/data, navigate to start URL
2. Act — user clicks, fills, submits (one journey)
3. Assert — URL, visible text, API side effect, DB state
4. Cleanup — delete test user/data if neededRules:
- No arbitrary sleeps — wait for network idle, selector, or API response
- Isolate tests — each can run alone and in parallel
- Deterministic data — unique emails (
test+${runId}@example.com) - Capture artifacts on failure — screenshot, trace, video in CI
5. Wire into CI ([[pipeline-ops]])
- Run P0 smoke on PR (allow 5–10 min budget)
- Full suite nightly
- Fail PR on P0 break; quarantine flaky tests within 24h — don't mute forever
- Store traces as CI artifacts
6. Maintain — flaky is failure
- Retry max 1–2 in CI only after fixing root cause
- Track flaky rate; >2% means investigate selectors or timing
- Update tests when intentional UI change — same PR as code
Common Rationalizations
- "Unit tests cover it" — Integration gaps hide in wiring, routing, and cookies.
- "E2E is too slow for CI" — Run smoke only on PR; full suite nightly.
- "We'll add E2E later" — Later never comes; P0 flows first.
- "Sleep 3 seconds works" — Flakes follow; use proper waits.
Red Flags
- Tests depend on execution order
- Hard-coded prod URLs or credentials
- Selectors tied to CSS modules that change weekly
- Suite disabled in CI "temporarily" for months
- No test for the primary revenue or signup path
Verification
- P0 flows identified (3–5 max) with spec traceability
- Tests use stable selectors and deterministic data
- Each test runs isolated; no sleep-based waits
- P0 smoke runs in CI on PR
- Failure artifacts (screenshot/trace) configured
- Flaky tests quarantined or fixed — not ignored
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

