sprint-plan
Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generates a new sprint plan or updates an existing one based on the current milestone, completed work, and available capacity. Pulls context from production documents and design backlogs.
35 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- alunadev/ald-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mehboobali98/rmine-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiosedited, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- yuusakuri/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- daviszhen/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Other versions35 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- CoralGame/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 19100% same
- Swih/godot-foundry★ 1100% same
Edited · 7
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 11823% same
- tranhieutt/software_development_department★ 7140% same
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 1722% same
- lilangMax/ClaudeCodeGameStudios★ 823% same
- hongyuanc/codex-game-studios★ 513% same
- dawn840705/claude-code-studios★ 123% same
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Plugin★ 116% same
Wrote their own version · 26
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- faizkhairi/claude-code-blueprint★ 73same name
- cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio★ 40same name
- a-lottes/aSPARK★ 25same name
- CodePhobiia/claude-roblox-game-studio★ 9same name
- alunadev/ald-skills★ 4same name
- gonimar/claude-web-studio★ 4same name
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2same name
- adolfoaranaes12/BMAD-ENHANCED★ 2same name
16 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- architecture-decisionSkill
- asset-auditSkill
- balance-checkSkill
- brainstormSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- estimateSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- hotfixSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- localizeSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- onboardSkill
- patch-notesSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- playtest-reportSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- prototypeSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- setup-engineSkill
- startSkill
- team-audioSkill
- team-combatSkill
- team-levelSkill
- team-narrativeSkill
- team-polishSkill
- team-releaseSkill
- team-uiSkill
- tech-debtSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 32 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
When this skill is invoked:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 32 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
When this skill is invoked:
- Read the current milestone from
production/milestones/. - Read the previous sprint (if any) from
production/sprints/to understand velocity and carryover. - Scan design documents in
design/gdd/for features tagged as ready for implementation. - Check the risk register at
production/risk-register/.
For new:
- Generate a sprint plan following this format:
# Sprint [N] -- [Start Date] to [End Date]
## Sprint Goal
[One sentence describing what this sprint achieves toward the milestone]
## Capacity
- Total days: [X]
- Buffer (20%): [Y days reserved for unplanned work]
- Available: [Z days]
## Tasks
### Must Have (Critical Path)
| ID | Task | Agent/Owner | Est. Days | Dependencies | Acceptance Criteria |
|----|------|-------------|-----------|-------------|-------------------|
### Should Have
| ID | Task | Agent/Owner | Est. Days | Dependencies | Acceptance Criteria |
|----|------|-------------|-----------|-------------|-------------------|
### Nice to Have
| ID | Task | Agent/Owner | Est. Days | Dependencies | Acceptance Criteria |
|----|------|-------------|-----------|-------------|-------------------|
## Carryover from Previous Sprint
| Task | Reason | New Estimate |
|------|--------|-------------|
## Risks
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|------------|--------|------------|
## Dependencies on External Factors
- [List any external dependencies]
## Definition of Done for this Sprint
- [ ] All Must Have tasks completed
- [ ] All tasks pass acceptance criteria
- [ ] No S1 or S2 bugs in delivered features
- [ ] Design documents updated for any deviations
- [ ] Code reviewed and mergedFor status:
- Generate a status report:
# Sprint [N] Status -- [Date]
## Progress: [X/Y tasks complete] ([Z%])
### Completed
| Task | Completed By | Notes |
|------|-------------|-------|
### In Progress
| Task | Owner | % Done | Blockers |
|------|-------|--------|----------|
### Not Started
| Task | Owner | At Risk? | Notes |
|------|-------|----------|-------|
### Blocked
| Task | Blocker | Owner of Blocker | ETA |
|------|---------|-----------------|-----|
## Burndown Assessment
[On track / Behind / Ahead]
[If behind: What is being cut or deferred]
## Emerging Risks
- [Any new risks identified this sprint]Agent Consultation
For comprehensive sprint planning, consider consulting:
produceragent for capacity planning, risk assessment, and cross-department coordinationgame-designeragent for feature prioritization and design readiness assessment
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

