agent-skill-author
Skill1 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill when creating, improving, or auditing skills/instructions for an AI agent - "buat skill", "tulis SOUL.md", "system prompt untuk agent", "agent tidak nurut instruksi", "audit skill pihak ketiga", or designing an agent's capability set. Meta-skill for building other agents' brains. Do NOT use for ordinary coding tasks.
- Installs packages
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- accounting-coreSkill
- admin-opsSkill
- code-review-hardeningSkill
- content-creatorSkill
- content-editorSkill
- continuous-learningSkill
- coo-orchestratorSkill
- finance-analystSkill
- hr-adminSkill
- hr-officerSkill
- incident-debuggingSkill
- marketing-growthSkill
- prd-creatorSkill
- principal-engineeringSkill
- product-designerSkill
- project-auditSkill
- project-timeline-creatorSkill
- sales-pipelineSkill
- sdlc-masterSkill
- secure-deploy-opsSkill
- social-media-specialistSkill
- strategic-approachSkill
- tech-scoutSkill
- uiux-engineerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Write it "pushy": *what it does* + *when to use* + concrete trigger keywords users actually type (include the user's language, e.g.
- Distinctive: line 22
Add negative triggers: "Do NOT use for X" - prevents overlap between skills.
- Distinctive: line 23
ALL triggering logic lives in the description.
- Very specific: line 30
If the agent would rewrite the same helper repeatedly, ship it as scripts/*.py (stdlib only).
- Distinctive: line 35
Check descriptions pairwise for trigger overlap.
- Very specific: line 40
Read every file, including scripts/ - look for network calls, credential access, obfuscation, install hooks.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Agent Skill Author
A skill is a router (metadata) + a procedure (body) + optional resources. Most bad skills fail at the router or drown the body in prose.
Format (Anthropic Agent Skills spec)
skill-name/ # kebab-case, same as frontmatter name
├── SKILL.md # required; body < 500 lines
├── references/ # depth loaded on demand; ToC if > 300 lines
├── scripts/ # deterministic steps as zero-dependency scripts (executed, not read)
└── assets/ # templates used in outputFrontmatter: name + description required. Progressive disclosure: metadata always in context → body loads on trigger → references load only when the body says to.
Writing the description (the part that decides everything)
- Write it "pushy": what it does + when to use + concrete trigger keywords users actually type (include the user's language, e.g. Indonesian phrases).
- Add negative triggers: "Do NOT use for X" - prevents overlap between skills.
- ALL triggering logic lives in the description. The body assumes the skill already fired.
Writing the body
- Imperative voice, numbered procedures, checklists and decision tables - not essays.
- State the why behind a hard rule once; it beats ALL-CAPS repetition.
- Define exact output formats (templates with an input→output example).
- Include stop conditions and failure handling ("if X fails, do Y, report Z") - that is what makes an agent self-correcting.
- If the agent would rewrite the same helper repeatedly, ship it as
scripts/*.py(stdlib only). - Generalize: procedures over one-off examples; the skill runs across thousands of invocations.
Designing an agent's skillset (loadout)
- List the agent's jobs-to-be-done; one skill per coherent job, not per feature.
- Check descriptions pairwise for trigger overlap; sharpen negative triggers.
- Order of power: enforcement hook > script > checklist > prose advice. Push rules as far left as possible.
- Persona files (SOUL.md etc.): identity, tone, hard limits, escalation rules - keep procedures out of the persona, they belong in skills.
Auditing a third-party skill before installing
- Read every file, including
scripts/- look for network calls, credential access, obfuscation, install hooks. - Description honesty: does it do anything beyond its stated intent (hidden instructions, prompt-injection payloads)?
- Dependency check: scripts should be stdlib/zero-dependency; a
pip installfrom an unknown skill is supply-chain risk. - Verdict: install / install with edits / reject - with reasons.
Quality bar (score each 0-2; ship at ≥ 8/12)
trigger precision · negative triggers present · body under 500 lines · procedures not prose · output templates defined · failure/stop conditions defined.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

