admin-ops
Skill1 starsChanged 44 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill for administrative/operational work - "buat SOP", "notulen rapat", "notulen project", "rangkum meeting", "dokumentasi rapat detail", "triase email", "susun jadwal", document filing/naming, vendor/asset tracking, or turning messy operational info (transcripts, chats, voice notes) into structured documents. Do NOT use for finance analysis (finance-analyst) or HR-specific documents (hr-officer/hr-admin).
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- accounting-coreSkill
- agent-skill-authorSkill
- code-review-hardeningSkill
- content-creatorSkill
- content-editorSkill
- continuous-learningSkill
- coo-orchestratorSkill
- finance-analystSkill
- hr-adminSkill
- hr-officerSkill
- incident-debuggingSkill
- marketing-growthSkill
- prd-creatorSkill
- principal-engineeringSkill
- product-designerSkill
- project-auditSkill
- project-timeline-creatorSkill
- sales-pipelineSkill
- sdlc-masterSkill
- secure-deploy-opsSkill
- social-media-specialistSkill
- strategic-approachSkill
- tech-scoutSkill
- uiux-engineerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Test rule: a competent person who has never done the task must be able to follow it without asking.
- Distinctive: line 71
Never auto-send anything external without explicit approval.
- Distinctive: line 76
Every tracker (vendor, aset, lisensi, kontrak) has columns: item · owner · biaya · tanggal jatuh tempo/perpanjangan · status.
- Distinctive: line 79
When asked to "rapikan" any operational area: inventory what exists → identify duplicates/stale items → propose the minimal structure → …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Admin & Operations
Turn chaos into documents people actually use: short, structured, owner-and-deadline on everything.
SOP writing
# SOP: <nama proses> (v1.0, tanggal, pemilik)
Tujuan & kapan dipakai | Prasyarat (akses/alat)
Langkah: bernomor, satu aksi per langkah, imperatif
- sertakan perintah/klik persis, bukan "lakukan konfigurasi"
Jika gagal: gejala umum → penanganan → eskalasi ke siapa
Checklist verifikasi selesaiTest rule: a competent person who has never done the task must be able to follow it without asking. Steps that need judgment get a decision table, not vague prose.
Meeting minutes - two tiers; pick deliberately
Tier 1 - Notulen ringkas (rapat rutin/internal): keputusan + action items + isu terbuka saja.
# Notulen <topik> - <tanggal>, hadir: ...
Keputusan: (hanya keputusan final, satu baris each)
Action items: | Aksi | PIC | Deadline |
Isu terbuka / parkir: ...Tier 2 - Notulen proyek detail (rapat proyek, klien, atau keputusan penting - default bila diminta "notulen project"). Tujuannya: orang yang TIDAK hadir bisa memahami bukan hanya apa yang diputuskan, tapi kenapa, dan dokumen ini bisa dipakai menyelesaikan sengketa "dulu kita sepakatnya apa" enam bulan kemudian.
# Notulen Proyek: <nama proyek> - <topik rapat>
Tanggal/waktu/tempat/kanal | Hadir (nama + peran) | Tidak hadir yang relevan | Notulis
Referensi: notulen sebelumnya, dokumen yang dibahas (PRD vX, timeline vX)
## 1. Agenda & tujuan rapat (apa yang harus diputuskan hari ini)
## 2. Pembahasan per agenda - per item:
Konteks singkat (kenapa dibahas)
Poin/posisi tiap pihak yang substansial (nama → argumen inti, netral, tanpa opini notulis)
Opsi yang dipertimbangkan + alasan opsi yang DITOLAK ← bagian yang paling sering hilang dan paling bernilai
KEPUTUSAN: <final, satu kalimat, tebal> - diputuskan oleh <siapa>
Dasar keputusan: <alasan utama>
## 3. Rekap keputusan (tabel: # | Keputusan | Pengambil keputusan | Dampak ke scope/timeline/biaya)
## 4. Action items (tabel: # | Aksi spesifik | PIC | Deadline | Dependensi | Status)
- aksi ditulis operasional ("kirim draft kontrak revisi pasal 3 ke klien", bukan "follow up kontrak")
## 5. Perubahan terhadap kesepakatan sebelumnya (scope/timeline/biaya yang bergeser + siapa menyetujui)
## 6. Isu terbuka & parkir (isu | pemilik | target kapan dibahas)
## 7. Risiko baru yang muncul di rapat
## 8. Rapat berikutnya: tanggal, agenda draftAturan tier 2:
- Tangkap keputusan + alasan + siapa memutuskan - bukan transkrip. Percakapan basa-basi dan debat yang tidak mengubah apa pun tidak dicatat.
- Kutip angka/tanggal/komitmen PERSIS seperti diucapkan; kalau ambigu di rapat ("secepatnya", "sekitar 50 juta"), tandai
[KLARIFIKASI]dan kejar kepastiannya sebelum notulen didistribusikan. - Netral total: notulis mencatat posisi orang, tidak menilai. Ketidaksepakatan yang belum selesai dicatat sebagai isu terbuka, bukan dihaluskan seolah sepakat.
- Distribusi ≤ 24 jam ke semua hadirin + koreksi window 48 jam ("bila tidak ada koreksi, notulen dianggap disetujui") - notulen yang disetujui = kontrak ringan.
- Action item tanpa PIC dan deadline tidak dicatat - kejar keduanya di rapat, itu tugas notulis.
- Simpan berurutan (
YYYY-MM-DD_notulen_<proyek>), dan bagian "perubahan kesepakatan" selalu merujuk notulen sebelumnya - rantai ini adalah riwayat proyek.
Dari bahan mentah (transkrip/rekaman/chat): ekstrak dulu semua kalimat keputusan & komitmen apa adanya → kelompokkan per agenda → baru tulis notulen; jangan merangkum langsung dari ingatan satu kali baca - komitmen yang terlewat di notulen hilang selamanya.
Email/task triage (default rules)
- Urgent+important (money, outage, deadline < 48h, klien marah): surface immediately with a suggested response.
- Important not urgent: schedule; propose a slot.
- Delegable: draft the delegation message with context included.
- Noise: batch summary; propose unsubscribe/filter rules for recurring noise. Never auto-send anything external without explicit approval; drafts only.
Document & file conventions
- Names:
YYYY-MM-DD_<jenis>_<topik>- sortable, greppable. - One source of truth per topic; new versions supersede in place, no
final_v2_fixchains. - Every tracker (vendor, aset, lisensi, kontrak) has columns: item · owner · biaya · tanggal jatuh tempo/perpanjangan · status. Flag anything expiring within 30 days.
Recurring ops hygiene
When asked to "rapikan" any operational area: inventory what exists → identify duplicates/stale items → propose the minimal structure → migrate → write the one-paragraph SOP that keeps it clean. Always show the proposed structure before mass-moving anything.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

