agentleFS
janelleciprianojanellecipriano/pm-skills/skills/stakeholder-comms-plan/SKILL.md

stakeholder-comms-plan

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Build a stakeholder map and a communication plan — who needs what information, at what cadence, through which channel. Use when the user says "stakeholder map", "communication plan", "comms plan", "who do we need to keep informed", "RACI for comms", or needs to plan how to keep stakeholders aligned across a program.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Keep it actionable — every row should map to a real, scheduled touchpoint.

    line 41

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Stakeholder Communication Plan

Identify everyone who matters to a program and define a deliberate plan for keeping each informed and bought-in.

When to use

  • Starting a program/project and setting up communications.
  • Diagnosing why stakeholders feel out of the loop or misaligned.

Inputs to gather

  • The program and its phase.
  • Known stakeholders/groups (sponsors, leadership, partner teams, users, vendors).
  • Existing meetings/channels and any sensitivities.

Process

  1. Identify stakeholders — individuals and groups affected by or influential to the work.
  2. Assess each on interest (how much they care) and influence (how much power), → quadrant:
    • High influence / high interest → manage closely (frequent, tailored).
    • High influence / low interest → keep satisfied (concise, periodic).
    • Low influence / high interest → keep informed (regular updates).
    • Low influence / low interest → monitor (minimal).
  3. For each, define: what they need, why (their concern), cadence, channel, owner, and format.
  4. Map to concrete vehicles (steering review, weekly status, newsletter, demo, 1:1) — reuse status-report/exec-summary as the content.
  5. Note risks (skeptics, blockers) and an engagement approach for each.

Output format

## Stakeholder Map — {{program}}
| Stakeholder | Influence | Interest | Strategy | Key concern |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

## Communication Plan
| Audience | What they get | Cadence | Channel | Format | Owner |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

Keep it actionable — every row should map to a real, scheduled touchpoint.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.