estimation-sizing
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Facilitate estimation and turn sizes into a credible delivery forecast — T-shirt sizes or story points, assumptions, and a range rather than a false-precision date. Use when the user says "estimate this", "size these stories", "how long will this take", "story points", "give me a delivery range", or needs to convert scope into a defensible timeline.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- capacity-planningSkill
- decision-logSkill
- dependency-mappingSkill
- escalationSkill
- exec-summarySkill
- launch-readinessSkill
- okr-trackingSkill
- postmortemSkill
- prd-reviewSkill
- program-health-dashboardSkill
- project-charterSkill
- raid-logSkill
- release-notesSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- roadmap-planningSkill
- sprint-planningSkill
- stakeholder-comms-planSkill
- status-reportSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Always estimate a range (optimistic / likely / pessimistic), never a single number.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Estimation & Sizing
Help a team size work honestly and translate sizes into a range, not a fake-precise date.
When to use
- Sizing a set of stories/initiatives, or producing a delivery forecast from scope.
- Sanity-checking an estimate that feels too confident.
Principles
- Estimate relative size (T-shirt: XS/S/M/L/XL, or points) before absolute time.
- Always estimate a range (optimistic / likely / pessimistic), never a single number.
- Make assumptions explicit — every estimate rides on them.
- Bigger = less certain. Break L/XL items down before committing.
- Account for the non-coding tax: review, testing, integration, meetings, ramp-up.
Process
- Clarify scope per item; flag anything too vague to size (size = "needs breakdown").
- Assign a relative size and a confidence (H/M/L). Split low-confidence big items.
- Capture the assumptions behind each estimate.
- Convert to time using a stated velocity / throughput or size→days mapping — show the conversion.
- Roll up to a range and add buffer for risk/unknowns proportional to uncertainty.
- Present as "likely X, could be Y–Z" with the drivers of the spread.
Output format
| Item | Size | Confidence | Assumptions | Est. range |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
**Rollup:** likely {{X}}, range {{Y–Z}} ({{unit}})
**Key drivers of uncertainty:** {{...}}
**Assumptions:** {{...}}Resist pressure for a single date — offer the range and the conditions under which the optimistic end holds.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

