agentleFS
janelleciprianojanellecipriano/pm-skills/skills/launch-readiness/SKILL.md

launch-readiness

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Run a go/no-go launch-readiness review for a product or feature release across all functions (product, eng, QA, design, docs, support, marketing, legal, ops). Use when the user says "launch readiness", "go/no-go", "are we ready to ship/launch", "release checklist", or needs a cross-functional sign-off before shipping.

13 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use experiment-designer and stakeholder-update.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Dokkabei97Skill

    experiment-designer

    Designs A/B tests and product experiments with hypothesis structuring, sample size calculation, duration estimation, and result interpretation. Unified framework for both product and marketing experiments.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    stakeholder-update

    Generate a stakeholder update tailored to audience and cadence. Use when writing a weekly or monthly status for leadership, announcing a launch, escalating a risk or blocker, or translating the same progress into exec-brief, engineering-detail, or customer-facing versions.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Launch Readiness

Drive a cross-functional readiness review that ends in a clear Go / No-Go / Go-with-conditions recommendation.

When to use

  • Approaching a release and you need to confirm every function is ready.
  • Preparing a go/no-go meeting or sign-off doc.

Inputs to gather

  • What's launching, the target date/window, and the rollout plan (e.g., %-based, regions, GA vs. beta).
  • Status by function; known open issues and their severity.
  • Success metrics and the rollback/kill-switch plan.

Process — review each readiness area

For each area, capture status (🟢/🟡/🔴), owner, evidence/notes, and blocking?:

  1. Product/Scope — acceptance criteria met; scope cuts agreed.
  2. Engineering — code complete, feature-flagged, perf/scale checked, on-call ready.
  3. Quality — test pass, critical bugs triaged to zero, edge cases covered.
  4. Design/UX — final review, accessibility, edge/empty/error states.
  5. Docs & Support — help content, runbooks, support team briefed.
  6. Go-to-market — comms, release notes (release-notes), pricing/packaging if relevant.
  7. Legal/Privacy/Compliance — reviews and approvals where required.
  8. Data/Analytics — instrumentation live; success metrics measurable.
  9. Rollout & rollback — staged plan, monitoring/alerts, tested rollback, named decision owner.

Decision

  • Go — all critical areas green.
  • Go with conditions — minor ambers with named owners + dates; list the conditions.
  • No-Go — any red in a blocking area; state what must close and the re-review date.

Output format

A readiness table (area · status · owner · notes · blocking?) followed by the recommendation, the conditions/blockers, and the rollback plan. State the decision owner and the go/no-go meeting time.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.